Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 14 updates in 2 topics
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Shafiq Khan
Jan 28, 2026, 8:55:20 AMJan 28
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Dear All,
Since you are having enough time to discuss about everything other than relativity. While discussing physics you should bear in mind that adopted paradigm of physics is under open challenge since 2012 standing till todate. You should also bear in mind that gravity and both nuclear forces have been shown to be fundamentally electromagnetic force. Besides I have discovered aether, the electric dipoles and fifth constituent of the universe. The series of papers are published in peer-reviewed journals and are available on Indian Journal of Science and Technology, General Science Journal, viXra, ResearchGate, SlideShare, Natural Philosophy Database etc. in my profile.
With Regards
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jan 27 11:37AM -0700
Franklin,
You have not resolved any of the inconsistencies demonstrated between your
longitudinal wave claim and electromagnetic waves.
On the other hand all electromagnetic wave behaviors have ...more
Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: Jan 28 02:39PM +1300
Franklin,
"*Electrons are generally thought ( by theoretical physicists) to be
elementary particles as they have no known components or internal structure*
."
And you assert that there is ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Jan 28 02:43AM
Cornelis,
"How" have I not resolved any of the inconsistencies. I resolved all of them point by point.
You make absolutely no counterargument. This is how your logic goes - I choose to ignore what ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Jan 28 02:46AM
Roger,
Seeing is believing, and I see them in the picture below, can't you?
It is indisputable, that the electron exists. No doubt at all, proven in experiments all the time. You can see them with ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Jan 28 03:03AM
See inline response
On Tuesday, January 27, 2026 at 03:11:03 AM PST, r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com> wrote:
Question - does the ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jan 27 09:42PM -0700
https://chatgpt.com/s/t_697314015e1481919dadd30da1965ec5
Cornelis Verhey
...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Jan 28 04:58AM
Akinbo,
As I mentioned before, it is not a solid, but may be a series of aligned poselectron dipoles constantly and actively being ejected from the the current source. This is not the same as as the ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jan 27 10:44PM -0700
Franklin,
I believe you have flippantly responded because in all this time you could
not find any real scientific evidence that supports your longitudinal
electromagnetic wave claim against the ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jan 28 08:49AM
Franklin,
As you confess, you are guessing, which is fine.
Your current guess is incompatible with our earlier agreement, since poselectron dipoles being ejected into the sea does not amount to the ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Jan 28 08:56AM
>>all speculative theoretical physics would fall under metaphysics <<
No it wouldn't - some is physics. What has happened is - physicists have
allowed physics and metaphysics to be mixed up ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jan 28 09:06AM
Cornelis,
The ChatGPT response you shared is essentially the mainstream account. At this point, the AI seems to maintain the mainstream view and it would appear it is not yet aware of your own ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jan 28 09:52AM
Roger A.,
You posted below in response to mine. My reply to your post is in bold blue.
“but you could next say that you prefer either the A frame or B frame then you have a preferred frame ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Jan 28 12:23PM
Akinbo
>>> As I mentioned in my email below, this used to be the case <<
always been the case if going by Newtonian physics and metaphysics
>> The discovery of CMBR has caused a ...more
Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: Jan 28 06:35AM +1300
*A**pparently* all you “physicists” *believe* that an absolute vacuum,
which is evidently impossible to create in extensive and expensive
experiments, actually “exists” and permeates between ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages