Apparently all you “physicists” believe that an absolute vacuum, which is evidently impossible to create in extensive and expensive experiments, actually “exists” and permeates between atoms throughout the entire universe.
And which hypothetical vacuum obviously could not transmit forces between observed material entities.
Roger Munday
Books:-
Thomas Kuhn “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”
Page 195 - “we do not see electrons” “we do not see electric currents at all”
Page 198 – “After that concession he has no recourse, his opponents proof is compelling. Only if the two discover instead that they differ about the meaning and application of stipulated rules, that their prior agreement provides no sufficient basis for proof, does the debate continue in the form it inevitably takes during scientific revolutions. That debate is about premises, and its recourse is to persuasion as a prelude to the possibility of proof.”
Henning Genz “Nothingness – The Science of Empty Space”
Page 64 – “Moreover it took the instruments of modern physics to permit the observations that prove there can be no such thing as absolutely empty space”
Page 207 - “The laws of physics will not admit the existence of a completely empty space.”
So all you believers in, e.g. “vacuous/aetherial interatomic spaces”, should set up and use a sealed high pressure container filled with atmospheric gases, and then physically pump out and extract as much of the internal gases as possible.
This experiment has been attempted in the past and, while extremely low pressures have been achieved, a perfect vacuum is prevented by the liquifaction and the eventual gasification of atoms from the cylinders internal metal surfaces.