Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 3 topics
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Shafiq Khan
Sep 4, 2025, 1:20:06 PMSep 4
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Hi Mr. Anderton,
I have shown that Einstein had done 1+1=3 whereas I have shown 1+1=2. It is as simple as that but this premise is on cosmic level that is why it could not be pointed out before. Einstein had derived the Lorentz transformation by doing tricks which has been already exposed mathematically. Einstein's fraud could not be exposed because the scale at terrestrial level is so small. Einstein's Theory could be tested only after 1975 onwards when experiments of Transverse Doppler effect were conducted by P. A. Davies & others and their null result simply nullified the Theory of Relativity. Then in 2002 and 2003 the same experiments were done with microwave radiations by Hartwig Thim with the highest possible experimental accuracy, and his null result confirmed the nullification of Theories of Relativity. There are other rational & experimental issues with Theories of Relativity which are discussed threadbare in my papers. The foundation of incorrect physics was laid by Lorentz and Fitzgerald when they introduced the concept of contraction of space in the direction of motion of the observer by Lorentz factor. Above two series of experiments prove beyond any doubt that Lorentz factor is simply mathematical manipulation and not real. With this Space-time Concept, Minkowsky geometry and Big Bang theory etc. go to the dust bin. This is why I circulate following information.
Kindly send this information to every office bearer of Nobel prize for physics and Physiology & medicine so that they cannot say afterwards that they did not know about this. Once Nobel prize is deservingly given to the discovery of aether that will be the end of Big Bang Theory the foundation of atheistic main-stream physics. Acceptance of discovery of aether, proved without any doubt whatsoever, will be beginning of theistic physics. I don't care whether they give me the Nobel prize or not but they should accept the truth for denying the truth knowingly they have to kill their conscience for which they will be answerable before God. Their conscience will curse the nominators and selectors of Nobel prize for physics for not giving the prize to the discoverer of the aether throughout their life though ultimately the discovery of aether will have to be awarded the Nobel prize. Let the Nobel prize organisation be truthful and if this will not awaken the conscience of the nominators and selectors then nothing can. I do realise the problem of Nobel prize organisations because all the nominators will have to be from the main-stream physics who do not want to know anything about what dissident physicists say or write. I being the dissident physicist so all the nominators would not like to include me in the list. For this hurdle I have the rational solution which is that those nominators be selected who accept my 'open challenge' and prove me wrong. It is worthwhile to mention here that I have put forward an open challenge to the adopted paradigm of physics i.e. main-stream physics in 2012 which is standing till today.
Following is the link to my publications including my open challenge
(Please also share this link with every university and science college of the world including research institutions of the world like NASA, ESA, CERN, FERMILAB etc.)
After the discovery of the existence of aether, the electric dipoles & fifth constituent of universe, in the year 2011 and putting forward the open challenge in 2012 to the adopted paradigm of physics I thought the prestigious Nobel prize Organisation will realise the importance of my discovery some day. But I waited for thirteen years but nothing happened though the open challenge continues to be standing till date. I did approach my government, wherein pathetic conditions prevail so far as education and science & technology are concerned, and there also nothing happened. Now I have decided to claim the Nobel prizes for physics and Physiology & medicine as a matter of right.
I want that all the professionals should recommend me for award of Nobel prizes in physics and Physiology & medicine for following discoveries and scientific research.
1. Discovery of aether, the electric dipoles as fifth constituent of the universe, without any doubt whatsoever in the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled "Michelson-Morley Experiment; A Misconceived and Misinterpreted Experiment' and substantiated by my several published papers.
2. Consequent upon discovery of aether, the electric dipoles, light/radiation has been shown to be the electromagnetic wave motion propagating in the electric dipoles of aether. Also consequent upon the discovery of aether all the four forces of nature are reduced to one force i. e. electromagnetic force in the scientific research paper titled 'Foundation of Theory of Everything; Non-living Things and Living Things'.
3. The Special Theory of Relativity, General Theory of Relativity, Minkowski geometry, Space-time Concept, Dark Matter and Dark Energy including the famous formula E=mc^2 are shown to be absolutely baseless in the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled 'Experimental and Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe' This paper also substantiates the existence of aether theoretically and experimentally.
4. A correct and flawless theory of cosmology has been proposed and published in the peer-reviewed journal titled 'Energy Theory of Matter and Cosmology'
5. A different paradigm of biological sciences has been proposed and published in the paper titled 'Theory of Origin and Phenomenon of Life' of which the revised version is under process wherein a metaphysical substance has been introduced, given the name of 'energy', which explains the consciousness, instincts, gowth, self-repair, cell function but above all biological laws This is the only alternative to explain the above-mentioned phenomena of life in all animal species including humans by reviving vitalism and called Revitalism. The laws of nature having been reduced to one electromagnetic force can in no case explain all phenomena of life.
The above-mentioned papers and other papers are available on journal site of Indian Journal of Science and Technology, General Science Journal, Natural Philosophers Database , ResearchGate, SlideShare, viXra, Elixir Online Publishing journal, Academia.edu etc in my profile.
On the basis of above-mentioned work I feel it is my right to claim the Nobel prizes as the adopted paradigm of physics is under open challenge which is standing since 2012 and it has been defended against several attempts of trying to disprove me.
With Regards
Mohammad Shafiq Khan (IFS)
M.Sc (physics) M.Sc (forestry)
Ex. Director, Writer, Scientist, Philosopher and above all a Philanthropist.
Note:- This may also be sent to all those who are concerned with nomination and selection of Nobel prizes for physics and Physiology & medicine. Please find out their emails or pages on Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, twitter, LinkedIn etc. and send them this post.
With Regards
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Ex. Director, Writer, Scientist, Philosopher and above all a philanthropist.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 03 08:25AM -0700
Hi Akinbo,
Just a few minor clarifications before I basically agree with your
scenarios. First, it's not that I don't think "the background"
interacts with normal matter. It's just that ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 03 05:19PM
Hi Carl,
Because we are in different time zones, your day is probably starting when mine is drawing to a close.
Thanks for appending your signature to the agreement(s). (Handshake). ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 11:05AM -0700
Akinbo,
It goes tangentially because that is the straight line motion it would go in it it weren't constantly being turned.
Is that any mystery? Every one knows that.
There is no bias. ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 11:07AM -0700
> Let's try it again:
> 1. Show me an experimental result that my model cannot explain
Franklin
Sent from my iPhone
...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 06:43PM
No Franklin. The games over. You can't explain a velocity dependent force from a position dependent force.
On Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 07:09:43 PM GMT+1, Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com> ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 06:49PM
Hi Franklin, I agree with you here. Akinbo's introduction of centripetal force into the discussion of what is causing inertial resistance, is a red herring. ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 03 12:43PM -0700
While you are at it consider setting a Foucault pendulum in motion in each
of your accelerating frames scenarios.
...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 03 02:01PM -0700
Franklin,
The waves form in a tensile medium under stress. Any change in local
stress redistributes through the medium as waves.
Cornelis Verhey
...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 04:58PM -0500
Cornelis,
Diving deeper, then how can a medium have tensile strength without particles?
-Franklin
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 3, 2025, at 4:01 PM, Cornelis Verhey ...more
Joe Sorge <joe....@decisivedx.com>: Sep 03 11:54PM
I do not want to get into the middle of this discussion, but you might find the linked video interesting: what happens to an orbiting object when the centripetal force is released:
...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 03 06:23PM -0700
Franklin,
We do not need particles to have a medium that has a property analogous to
tensile strength. A non-linear tensile strength is postulated to be a
fundamental property of the wave ...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 03 07:56PM -0700
Joe,
The video is interesting, but mostly deals with variants of the issue.
Instead, take a rotating rod (or wheel) and place an electromagnet on
the end/rim. Take a steel ball bearing and ...more
AJ <andre...@gmail.com>: Sep 03 11:15PM -0400
A quantized manifestation of an infinitely variable seamless pure analog medium.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 3, 2025, at 9:23 PM, Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com> wrote:
...more
Joe Sorge <joe....@decisivedx.com>: Sep 04 03:37AM
Agreed. The magnet and bearing would be more elegant.
And please understand that I have nothing to add with respect to ether variants and theories. I just thought the video was interesting.
...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 04 10:07AM
Hi Joe, This is known as "Contraption Physics" whereby an elaborate contraption is constructed, introducing hidden effects into a classical scenario with the aim of demonstrating that ...more
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: Sep 04 04:35PM +0530
All,
Here is a link from a kid from India who has a phenomenal memory.
The kid is revered for his genius which is - memory.
Notice how - there is zero - critical thinking in his presentation. ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 04 11:37AM
Hi Carl, et.al.,
When you deeply contemplate the four scenarios, this is where we should really acknowledge Sir Isaac’s genius, working as he did in darkness with the CMBR lights switched off.
...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 04 11:56AM
Hi Carl, et.al.,
MAJOR LESSON SUMMARY
This may or may not be on all fours with your inkling as to what I may be driving, viz. “My inkling as to what you may be driving at is that the inertial ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 04 12:44PM
Franklin,
Yes, I agree that if no forces to cause constant turning in the poselectron sea, then we get the straight-line motion. But you should be able to see from this that poselectron sea DOES ...more
Shafiq Khan <shaf...@gmail.com>: Sep 04 01:57PM +0530
Dear All,
Do you all know that Theories of Relativity are under open challenge since
2012 and standing till today. It is worthwhile to inform you that open
challenge has been put forward on the ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 04 10:14AM +0100
According to Google AI - The claim that the Theories of Relativity have
been under open challenge since 2012 is associated with a specific
individual, Mohammad Shafiq Khan, who published an ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 04 10:36AM +0100
According to AI where your views align with me -- Where Khan and You
Align
*
Rejection of spacetime as fundamental
Khan says spacetime is just a mathematical trick. You argue that ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 04 10:55AM +0100
The different AI points out (and I think the main difference) is -
Philosophical clarity
Your critique emphasizes metaphysical realism and intelligibility.
Khan’s writings are more ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 04 10:55AM +0100
typo correction
------ Original Message ------
From: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 4th 2025, 10:55
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: ...more
Steve Brown <mail...@gmail.com>: Sep 03 11:28AM -0700
*This is a fictional biography.People, having information about a certain
period of Sinatra’s life would be about to edit a biography about the
famous singer.Buy records? You can’t let a ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
Shafiq Khan
Sep 4, 2025, 1:56:15 PMSep 4
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Hi Mr. Anderton,
Good to know that you have got my and your vision compared by unbiased AI.
Our perspectives match so far as theories of relativity and invalidity of Lorentz factor are concerned. This nullified the Big Bang theory so space turns from emergent to absolute and here enters the theism. Further the discovery of aether consolidates our perspective.
Cheers
With Regards
Shafiq
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
Sep 5, 2025, 6:43:33 AMSep 5
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Hi Shafiq
Have you ever done a Saturday talk for John Chappell Natural Philosophy society? We could do one if you like.
see
https://www.youtube.com/@JohnChappell/streams
At the moment I am trying to get news media attention that AI says Einstein's relativity is wrong (proviso is that have to ask AI the right way or it parrots mainstream physics point-of-view) but not getting anywhere.
Regards
Roger
------ Original Message ------
From: shaf...@gmail.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 4th 2025, 18:56
Subject: Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-rel...@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 3 topics
Hi Mr. Anderton,
Good to know that you have got my and your vision compared by unbiased AI.Our perspectives match so far as theories of relativity and invalidity of Lorentz factor are concerned. This nullified the Big Bang theory so space turns from emergent to absolute and here enters the theism. Further the discovery of aether consolidates our perspective.CheersWith RegardsShafiq
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025, 10:49 PM Shafiq Khan <shaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAHYwPz2_Gy9K6GsnFrsjuz3y-vvYWg_GcrmWd2w%2BwVe1B7qJfQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages