Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 15 updates in 5 topics

[Shafiq Khan]

This is the mail which I wrote to

nobel...@nobelprizemedicine.org.

But Gmail has refused to mail it and put it in Queue. My friends are requested to send it to the address given above and show it is from shaf...@gmail.com.

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

After showing the existence of aether the door for existence of metaphysical substances also does open. Accordingly a substance called 'energy' has been conceived as the source of life in the living beings with which the phenomena of life  like consciousness, instincts, gowth, self-repair, cell function and above all the biological laws could be explained. This has been done in a philosophical and scientific paper published in a  peer-reviewed journal titled "Theory of Origin and Phenomenon of Life". Though the paper is under revision but conceptually the contents of the paper remains the same. This will revolutionize the biological sciences as the source of life in humans and animals is the same. Now animals could also be utilised for experimentation formally. The contents of the paper will finally help us understand the biological laws and would revolutionize the subject of medicine. 

This paper I self nominate for award of Nobel prize for physiology and medicine though this is not the procedure but such a procedure needs to be adopted & modified for the better functioning of the system . I am attaching a copy of the paper for ready reference. Lastly I have a humble request that the copy of this mail along with the paper may be send to everyone concerned with the award of Nobel prize. 

With Great Regards 

Mohammad Shafiq Khan (IFS)Q

On Fri, May 16, 2025, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

npa-rel...@googlegroups.com

Google Groups

Today's topic summary
View all topics

• New Fundamental Axiom in Physics - 1 Update
• Questions on today's talk - 10 Updates
• "Kinetic Theory" - 2 Updates
• SRT - 1 Update
• Lorenz transform and special relativity - 1 Update

New Fundamental Axiom in Physics

Pentcho Valev <pentch...@gmail.com>: May 16 12:30AM -0700 https://x.com/pentcho_valev/status/1923265482280370418     ME​   GIF: Observer changes his speed and sees distances between light pulses vary so that speed of light relative to him remains ...more

Back to top

Questions on today's talk

John-Erik Persson <ask...@yahoo.se>: May 15 07:39PM Roger A I hope that you will comment on this one.THE LORENZ TRANSFORM IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE WAVE MODEL FOR LIGHT. John-Erik   Den tisdag 22 oktober 2024 kl. 00:51:17 CEST, John-Erik Persson ...more

ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: May 15 10:49PM +0100 Hi John-Erik   Sorry but as usual you confuse me.   You start with mainstream opinion - &quot;According to the official opinion about light behavior, ..&quot; and tell us that it was ether ...more

John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: May 16 01:31AM +0200 Roger A   - Mainstream says no ether - I say there is an ether - Gravity cannot be explained without an ether. - What do you say?   With kind regards from __________ John-Erik   ...more

ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: May 16 12:51AM +0100 John-Erik   that sounds better Roger A ------ Original Message ------ From: joer...@gmail.com To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 15th 2025, 00:32 Subject: Re: Re: ...more

Jerry Harvey <jerry...@gmail.com>: May 15 06:51PM -0500 Hi John-Erik.   While I also disagree with the Lorentz transformations, I don't see how they're inherently in conflict with the concept of light waves. Also, how to know for sure that the ether ...more

John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: May 16 02:27AM +0200 Roger   - Transverse ether wind can cause light to take a longer way *without* taking a longer time - This was a wrong argument for time dilation as I sad   John-Erik ...more

John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: May 16 02:36AM +0200 Jerry     - Matter absorbs eher particles - The number of particles leaving a body are reduced - The number of particles approaching a birthday is not changed - We get a net flow in ...more

Jerry Harvey <jerry...@gmail.com>: May 15 08:52PM -0500 Hi John-Erik.   That doesn't explain the illusion of how one object is attracted to another though. How is one object's position relative to another taken into account?   On Thu, May 15, 2025 at ...more

John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: May 16 07:03AM +0200 Jerry   - Gravity emerges inside matter   So, gravity has got the property to attract other matter John-Erik     ...more

Jerry Harvey <jerry...@gmail.com>: May 16 12:29AM -0500 So the ether particles cause this? If so, how?   On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 12:03 AM John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com> wrote:   ...more

Back to top

"Kinetic Theory"

Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: May 16 08:16AM +1200 Frank,   Your “observations” of “subatomic particles” are *generated* streaks on a photographic plate, which could well be structurally collective *atomic* particles.   You all ...more

Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: May 15 08:55PM -0400 Roger, You are not from a science background and in no position to discuss metrology. Same with Franklin. Franklin was present at Storrs. Only when we see the papers and the presentations do we ...more

Back to top

SRT

John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: May 15 05:37PM +0200 I am sorry this one was old. Here is the latest version John-Erik     On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 7:21 PM John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com> wrote:   ...more

Back to top

Lorenz transform and special relativity

John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: May 15 05:31PM +0200 To all   The Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model.   See attachment: *Why special Relativity is wrong.*   *John-Erik* ...more

Back to top

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.