Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 19 updates in 3 topics

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Shafiq Khan

unread,
Sep 6, 2025, 1:42:15 PMSep 6
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Dear John and Roger, 

I have taken a vow that I will make truth to prevail because relativity is blatant falsehood. Unfortunately falsehood has  established itself as truth since last one hundred and twenty years but no more now. I will try to make a power point presentations but after some time because presently I am busy in preparing an article. Please do read following passage and make your suggestions. 
Kindly send this information to every office bearer of Nobel prize for physics and Physiology & medicine so that they cannot say afterwards that they did not know about this. Once Nobel prize is deservingly given to the discovery of aether that will be the end of  Big Bang Theory the foundation of atheistic main-stream physics. Acceptance of discovery of aether, proved without any doubt whatsoever, will be beginning of theistic physics.  I don't care whether they give me the Nobel prize or not but they should accept the truth for denying the truth knowingly they have to kill their conscience for which they will be answerable before God. Their conscience will curse the nominators and selectors of Nobel prize for physics for not giving the prize to the discoverer of the aether throughout their life though ultimately the discovery of aether will have to be awarded the Nobel prize. Let the Nobel  prize organisation be truthful and if this will not awaken the conscience of the nominators and selectors then nothing can. I do realise the problem of Nobel prize organisations because all the nominators will have to be from the main-stream physics who do not want to know anything about what dissident physicists say or write. I being the dissident physicist so all the nominators would not like to include me in the list. For this hurdle I have the rational solution which is that those nominators be selected who accept my 'open challenge' and prove me wrong. It is worthwhile to mention here that I have put forward an open challenge to the adopted paradigm of physics i.e. main-stream physics in 2012 which is standing till today. 

Following  is the link to my publications including my open challenge 
(Please also share this link with every university and science college of the world including research institutions of the world like NASA, ESA, CERN, FERMILAB etc.)

After the discovery of the existence of aether, the electric dipoles & fifth constituent of universe, in the year 2011 and putting forward the open challenge in 2012 to the adopted paradigm of physics I thought the prestigious Nobel prize Organisation will realise the importance of my discovery some day. But I waited for thirteen years but nothing happened though the open challenge continues to be standing till date. I did approach my government, wherein pathetic conditions prevail so far as education and science &  technology are concerned, and there also nothing happened. Now I have decided to claim the Nobel prizes for physics and Physiology & medicine  as a matter of right.

I want that all the professionals should recommend me for award of Nobel prizes in physics and Physiology & medicine for following discoveries and scientific research. 
1. Discovery of aether, the electric dipoles as fifth constituent of the universe, without any doubt whatsoever in the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled "Michelson-Morley Experiment; A Misconceived and Misinterpreted Experiment' and substantiated by my several published papers.
2. Consequent upon discovery of aether, the electric dipoles, light/radiation has been shown to be the electromagnetic wave motion propagating in the electric dipoles of aether. Also consequent upon the discovery of aether all the four forces of nature are reduced to one force i. e. electromagnetic force in the scientific research paper titled 'Foundation of Theory of Everything; Non-living Things and Living Things'. 
3. The Special Theory of Relativity, General Theory of Relativity, Minkowski geometry, Space-time Concept, Dark Matter and Dark Energy including the famous formula E=mc^2 are shown to be absolutely baseless in the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled 'Experimental and Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe' This paper also substantiates the existence of aether theoretically and experimentally.
4. A correct and flawless theory of cosmology has been proposed and published in the peer-reviewed journal titled 'Energy Theory of Matter and Cosmology'
5. A different paradigm of biological sciences has been proposed and published in the paper titled 'Theory of Origin and Phenomenon of Life' of which the revised version is under process wherein a metaphysical substance has been introduced, given the name of 'energy', which explains the consciousness, instincts, gowth, self-repair, cell function but above all biological laws  This is the only alternative to explain the above-mentioned phenomena of life in all animal species including humans by reviving vitalism and called Revitalism. The laws of nature having been reduced to one electromagnetic force can in no case explain all phenomena of life.
The above-mentioned papers and other papers are available on journal site of Indian Journal of Science and Technology, General Science Journal, Natural Philosophers Database , ResearchGate, SlideShare, viXra, Elixir Online Publishing journal, Academia.edu etc in my profile.
On the basis of above-mentioned work I feel it is my right to claim the Nobel prizes as the adopted paradigm of physics is under  open challenge which is standing since 2012 and it has been defended against several attempts of trying to disprove me.

With Regards 
Mohammad Shafiq Khan (IFS)
M.Sc (physics) M.Sc (forestry)
Ex. Director, Writer, Scientist, Philosopher and above all a Philanthropist.

Note:- This may also be sent to all those who are concerned with nomination and selection of Nobel prizes for physics and Physiology & medicine. Please find out their emails or pages on Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, twitter, LinkedIn etc. and send them this post.

On Sat, Sep 6, 2025, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 05 01:59PM

(Please remove Tom Miles and Franklintayunghu from any future replies)Akinbo,You just described how inertia works according to mainstream, so I still don't see your point.
If you asked "pushed ...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 05 08:45AM -0700

Hi Akinbo,
 
To your first paragraph, you must be referring to a different Sir
Isaac.  I did a quick double check with ChatGPT.
 
My question:
 
"According to Newton, is inertial motion (motion ...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 05 08:46AM -0700

Hi David,
 
It sounds like everything is being squished by centrifugal force.
 
As for this line: "In the straight-line inertial path, we can plot a
centrifugal force to any point in space, other ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 05 10:00AM -0700

Akinbo,
 
Again from my answer to you before.
 
"This does not demonstrates an absolute reference frame. It only
demonstrates that the CMB as an identifiable energy pattern in space-time ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 05 06:26PM +0100

Tomorrow get to the foundation on which all the wrong stuff has been
built- Relativity principle is wrong.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhlKCS-SNGk ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 05 05:30PM

Hi Carl,            In the explanation below, I made no attempt to address the physical cause of centrifugal force or the inertial path, although I have done that elsewhere.           The ...more
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: Sep 06 10:21AM +0530

All,
In today's news...looks similar to the Fernandes Ether Model. Mainstream
will reach my model sooner than I thought.
Just as NIST defined one Kg via photons which I worked out 15 years ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 06 09:35AM

Hi Carl,
 
Re: “So, I just think we're going to be in disagreement because we seem to have different Newtons.”
 
ChatGPT is okay for guidance, but you must know how to interrogate it or else it ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 06 09:59AM

Franklin, Carl, et.al.,
 
Read the bolded portion of this:
 
“These notions imply that absolute space and time do not depend upon physical events, but are a backdrop or stage setting within which ...more
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: Sep 06 06:31AM -0400

All,
Who is the observer of the bulge? The camel, the eye of the needle, Who Am,
A camera at lightspeed? Who?
[image: Door.png]
 
F V Fernandes
 
*On.Target Molecules Biotech Inc*
...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 06 10:39AM

A video camera should be fine
 
 
________________________________
From: Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 6, 2025 11:31 AM
To: Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com> ...more
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: Sep 06 08:58AM -0400

I was told that - if you cannot see your toes without bending - it is time
up, ticking away. No need for metrology and cameras.
No need for a modern theory nor a new name.
 
F V Fernandes
...more
Shafiq Khan <shaf...@gmail.com>: Sep 05 10:57PM +0530

Hi Anderton
Yes I did participate in some weekly lectures about a decade back. There
were mostly dissident physicists who were trying to convince each other
that relativity is incorrect. ...more
John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: Sep 05 09:25PM +0200

Shafiq
 
- Special relativity is built on the Lorentz transform
- The Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model
- So, special relativity is in conflict with the wave model ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 05 10:35PM +0100

>> The Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model<<<
 
 
AI says - the Lorentz transform is not in conflict with the wave model
if one accepts Einstein’s postulates of special ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 05 10:38PM +0100

Hi Shafiq
 
If you have powerpoint you could write the slides in powerpoint, and I
could present just that.
 
Regards
Roger
 
 
------ Original Message ------
From: shaf...@gmail.com ...more
John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: Sep 06 02:02AM +0200

Roger
To use Einstein to justify Lorentz is to reason in the wrong direction.
John-Erik
 
 
On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 11:35 PM 'r.j.an...@btinternet.com
r.j.an...@btinternet.com' via ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Sep 06 07:54AM +0100

didn't
 
talking instead about Lorentz transforms in Einstein context
------ Original Message ------
From: joer...@gmail.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 6th ...more
John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: Sep 05 06:17PM +0200

Cornelis
No, waves cannot be the foundation of everything, since there must be
something to do the waving, and we call that the ether, and the ether must
exist to be the foundation ofMy theory says ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages