Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 26 updates in 1 topic

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Shafiq Khan

unread,
Oct 31, 2025, 11:21:30 AMOct 31
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Hi All, 
If aether is electric dipoles of electron and positron combination then they should annihilate as soon as those are formed. Don't you consider this simple fact before proposing the concept. 

With Regards 
Mohammad Shafiq Khan 

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Oct 30 02:18PM

>> It’s not data retrieval; it’s pattern recognition. That’s what humans
>> do. That’s how we learn. A baby touches a hot burner; it learns the
>> pattern. Pain equals caution. ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Oct 30 09:44AM -0500

Roger,
 
The list is descriptions with hotlinks leading to some of the research AI
has been applied to.
 
Cornelis Verhey
 
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025, 9:18 AM r.j.an...@btinternet.com
...more
Andy Schultheis <andre...@gmail.com>: Oct 30 10:51AM -0400

You're missing the point. *It is solving problems right now.* AI is subtly
replacing humans in some intellectual and creative roles. Or augmenting,
depending on your interpretation. ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Oct 30 02:52PM

Yeah, Corry. But the first article (as example) has a lot of question
marks; whatever that is supposed to mean.
------ Original Message ------
From: verhey....@gmail.com
To: ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Oct 30 02:55PM

Andy,
 
I am engaging in your preferred language in a bid to reach some consensus. What is important is to provide clarity when required and avoid internal inconsistencies and absurdities. ...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Oct 30 02:58PM

Hi Andreas 
 
I don't know if you are referring to me.
 
I don't know if you are asking AI about different pov (points-of-view).
 
Based on different povs it will give different answers. ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Oct 30 03:32PM

OK, here's the new paper with late nineteenth century physicists discussing the developments in electromagnetism in the year 1887.
I fed in the information, but ChatGPT mostly articulated it for me. ...more
Andy Schultheis <andre...@gmail.com>: Oct 30 11:32AM -0400

Akinbo,
 
I meant to say, "The medium", not "A medium." I caught that after I hit
send, and I was concerned it may cause confusion.
 
Place is a relative term, at tension>0.
 
The greater theory ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Oct 30 10:22AM -0700

Why would that be a reason to rule it out?
 
-Franklin
 
Sent from my iPhone
 
On Oct 29, 2025, at 5:41 PM, AJ <andre...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 All the more reason to rule that out, Franklin. ...more
Andy Schultheis <andre...@gmail.com>: Oct 30 02:17PM -0400

*" Electrons and positrons are well within our observational limits."*
 
...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Oct 30 11:37AM -0700

AJ,
 
Regarding, "I guide it."  That's exactly where the quicksand lies. You
can bend it to your will.  Even subtly, it takes cues from us. As Akinbo
noted, it wants to please us so that we ...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Oct 30 11:44AM -0700

Cornelis,
 
No, it is exactly why we have such clarity.  Why do you suppose that
with the naked eye we can distinctly see (and stare at) billions of
stars and galaxies, but can't stare at our ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Oct 30 06:49PM

Thank you Carl. You got that very right. Andy, I hope you take note.
Since you (Andy) use AI a lot, you may even experiment with deliberately "guiding it" in the opposite direction to your choice ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Oct 30 06:55PM

Andy,
I didn't understand this your response to mine. And I don't know if my asking you to go over my email and respond again directly, would make things better or worse...
I will keep my fingers ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Oct 30 07:38PM

Wouldn't the logical conclusion be if that the aether were made out of positrons and electrons, that sufficient energy would break them apart and then we would definitely see them?
...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Oct 30 08:38PM

David,
I would think that rather than "conflate", but rather "simplify" if the medium which is responsible for the fundamental forces is also the medium for the EM wave. It gets even simpler when the ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Oct 30 03:55PM -0500

Carl,
 
I was speaking in regard to the discussion that involve space being filled
with positrons and electrons as a sea of tiny vortices.
 
When you through your comment about dispersion in I ...more
Andy Schultheis <andre...@gmail.com>: Oct 30 04:57PM -0400

Carl,
 
Of course. I've stated that. They hard code user retention routines into
the AI, and then slapped guardrails on top of it so it doesn't offend
users, culturally, religiously, politically, ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Oct 30 04:36PM -0500

Your concern is a classic and very reasonable one: *How can a light beam
maintain its integrity and propagate in a straight line through a medium
described as a “liquid in a state of fine-grained ...more
Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: Oct 31 10:50AM +1300

Franklin,
I posted my 'Continuous Magnetic Paper' earlier which states:-
*"In the thermometer case the mass of the liquid in the tube results in the
evaporation of some mercury atoms at the top of ...more
Andy Schultheis <andre...@gmail.com>: Oct 30 06:11PM -0400

Franklin,
 
The electron is about 1.7×10x20 times larger than the Planck length.
Roughly a hundred quintillion times larger.
 
Being within range of current technology, we'd most likely know by ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Oct 30 10:22PM

Cornelis,              The article that you fed into your AI machine wasn't intended to address the question that you keep asking about how can a ray of light maintain a straight-line path ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Oct 30 10:28PM

Andreas,              Then it's funny how electron-positron pair annihilation only ever happens for particles that particular size.
             The easiest explanation is that they ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Oct 31 11:33AM

Andy,
 
Re: “I hope that clears it up.”
 
No, it doesn’t. We already had terms that we were trying to arrive at a mutual agreement on what they mean, only for new terms that do not illuminate ...more
John Jolley <johnjol...@gmail.com>: Oct 31 04:41PM +0500

Hey neighbors! I just booked a local tech for duct cleaning (regular price
is $300) but he offered me a group deal for $199 if a few more households
join in. One of my neighbors already signed up, ...more
Andy Schultheis <andre...@gmail.com>: Oct 31 09:08AM -0400

Akinbo,
 
Maybe the confusion lies in your personal meaning of "place", because I
don't exactly know what you're referring to when you say "place" at this
point. I assumed you meant a location, ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages