A Continuum of Atoms

[Roger Munday]

The universe is ultimately, and completely, composed of a continuum of material atoms.

Which continuously interactive atoms expand and contract with locally transmitted inputs and emissions of energy/matter.

If a sealed sphere, such as a plastic balloon, is taken out into space from the pressures of the Earth’s atmosphere at its surface, it will progressively expand in volume in the lower external pressures experienced there.

This is due to the collective expansions of the contained gaseous atoms in the balloon in the decreasing pressures at these increasing altitudes.

No interatomic vacuum exists in the entire universe.

And no experimenter can isolate an absolute vacuum. This is because atoms in the internal surfaces of a metal apparatus at very low pressures liquidate and then evaporate to fill the space.

Roger Munday

[Roger Munday]

So not one of you can prove that your hypothetical vacuum can be isolated in experiment and is a possible "state".

Roger Munday

[Roger Munday]

Kinetic Atomic Theory of Gases

This theory states that the component atoms of any observed volume of matter are in continuous "kinetic" motion within an interatomic vacuum.

This "kinetic" theory is today replicated in all theoretical physics books and papers.

And evidently you all collectively accept this essentially vacuous theory of the ultimate structure of matter.

Even when it is experimentally proven that such nonmaterial, perfectly vacuous spaces cannot be isolated or created.

I suggest you go to a library and take out Henning Genz’s book “Nothingness – The science of empty space” in which he states:-

“The laws of physics will not admit the existence of a completely empty space.”

In other words, atoms are not separated by a hypothetical “vacuum”.

Roger Munday

[Roger Munday]

https://sciborg.us/atomic-structure-theories-and-models/

This paper lists numerous attempts to explain the general and evidently absolute beliefs of theoretical physicists (including all here) in the “existence” of a variety of subatomic and interatomic particles, such as totally unexaminable “protons” and “neutrons” and “electrons”, all of which were created historically by physicists to fill their assumed interatomic vacua/aethers.

Examples:-

Atomic Models

Atomic models are used to represent the atoms of materials in order to understand their physical, chemical, and electrical properties. There are several atomic models, such as Dalton’s atomic theory, Thomson atomic model, Rutherford atomic theory, and Bohr’s atomic theory.

Subatomic Particles

Atoms as a whole are composed of numerous subatomic particles. Protons and neutrons reside in the nucleus at the center of the atom, while electrons orbit the nucleus at various distances. Protons have a positive charge and neutrons are electrically neutral. Electrons, on the other hand, have a negative charge.

So you apparently believe that “Electrons orbit the nucleous” in vacuum.

Roger Munday

[Roger Munday]

Henning Genz

In his book "Nothingness- The Science of Empty Space"

Chapter 5 "Crowded Space"

"Defining the Vacuum"

"Today we know this is impossible. There is no such thing as absolutely empty space"

Roger Munday

[Roger Munday]

So, not one of you can prove that your hypothetical "vacuum" can be isolated in experiment, 

and so is a possible "state".

Roger Munday

[John-Erik Persson]

What no one can prove proves nothing

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CACi_vwcbjKarzVq3N-NWQDYK7WpBjVh98esTRtP67kMYn0gVCw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Roger Munday]

Indeed, there are physicists who believe in the "existence" of vacua/aethers.

[John-Erik Persson]

Lack of proof means that

1. existence not proved
2. nonexistence not proved

and both cases are possible

[Roger Munday]

So not one of you can prove that your hypothetical vacuum can be isolated and is a possible state.

[John-Erik Persson]

Roger

You have not proved anything 

[Roger Munday]

John-Erik

I have not tried to prove anything.

I left that to Henning Genz.

Did you not read his paper?

[John-Erik Persson]

No

[Roger Munday]

"Ignorance is bliss"

[Roger Munday]

Let's try and understand light in terms of an excitation of empty space-even if that makes no immediate sense. We might alternatively understand light in terms of a field, as we introduced that term in chapter 2. But light differs from the fields of temperature distributions, of sound, or of water in fluid motion described there: Whereas those phenomena are due to the composite action or motion of molecules at a more elementary level, light has its own reality at that level. It cannot be understood in terms of an oscillation of some matter that also exists in the dark-no, light is nothing but just that, light. It is an oscillation of an abstract nature, equivalent to a set of numbers that are assigned to each point in space. True, these abstract numbers have implications-most notably, they imply energy. But while a water wave transports energy by the movement of water molecules, the passing of a light wave does not mean that anything material oscillates. The energy of the liquid wave is the energy associated with gravitation and motion of its molecules; the energy of light is energy pure and simple, associated with every illuminated point in space.”
― Henning Genz, Nothingness: The Science Of Empty Space

[Frank Fernandes]

Henning's paragraph is THRASH.

 

F V Fernandes

On. Target Molecules Biotech Inc

Website: O.TM Biotech Inc. / Linkedin 

Research Work Website: Aither 186

Book: The Ether Model

 

 

[Roger Munday]

Henning Genz asserts that:-

the passing of a light wave does not mean that anything material oscillates.

This is where Genz goes wrong.

All the continuous atoms of the atmosphere align N-S magnetically and continuously with the N-S magnetic poles of the Earth.

This is how the fields propagate within the Earth's continuous  magnetic atomic fields.

But all you theoretical physicists are conditioned into believing in a hypothetical interatomic and universal vacuum.

Within which no continuous forces could possibly act.

Roger Munday

[Roger Munday]

For those who believe, in the total absence of proof, that interatomic vacua "exist".

I suggest you read this paper.

https://romunpress.co.nz/romunnose/continuous-magnetic-atoms/

Roger Munday