Turmoil in physics

[John-Erik Persson]

To ll

MAKE PHYSICS GREAT AGAIN

• Physics is in a very bad state and full of inconsistencies.
• In 1887 Lorentz said that transverse ether wind can reduce light speed - in conflict with the wave model.
• In 1905 Einstein repeated the mistake in special relativity.
• Instead of time dilation, light propagation depends on the ether wind, since light moves forth and back in relation to the ether wind in one dimension of two, the effect of ether wind in atomic clocks is half the effect in 2-way light. This effect causes the illusion of time dilation. Time dilation is not physics.
• In 1915 Einstein said gravity is geometry. But geometry is not physics. He fooled us all. Instead, matter absorbs ether particles and causes a radial ether wind, causing gravity.
• Einstein was wrong in 1905 and 1915 about SRT and GRT.
• Electrons captured in atoms generate X-rays. This process is reversible and also explains the photoelectric effect with the wave model and we do not need light particles, as Bohr said. We perhaps need ether particles.
• Hydrogen radiation demonstrates quantization in binding energy, but this does not prove quantization outside atoms. We do not need general quantization in energy.
• Lorentz, Einstein and Bohr made important errors.
• It is about time to CORRECT THEM.

John-Erik

[John-Erik Persson]

David and all

I repeat this mail, since I think that theoretical physics is in a very, very bad state.

• Lorentz transform is in conflict with the wave model
• Niels Bohr's duality in light is wrong
• Einstein abolished the important ether
• Einstein abolished the important emerging gravity by ether particles

Three important scientists made four important errors

WE MUST MAKE PHYSICS GREAT AGAIN

John-Erik

See the link

Turmoil in physics (modified).docx---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Apr 4, 2026 at 12:07 AM
Subject: Turmoil in physics
To: Abridged Recipients <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com>

[David de Hilster]

John

There is now a better model out there and it is not an aether.

You, like many suffer from not reading others and are stuck.

I can’t help you there. We most move on without those clinging to a model that is too full of fatal flaws and move to a newer better one.

Good luck! Everyone is free to peruse their directions.

David

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 12, 2026, at 4:02 PM, John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com> wrote:



[John-Erik Persson]

David

Thanks for the answer.

You have a limited view of what ether is. In my opinion there is only ether or empty space, but we do not know much about the ether. I think: perhaps extremely small particles moving in all directions. Therefore, light is waves and not particles. No duality, since particles are needed for the ether model and not for light. Bohr was wrong.

We should correct for important errors by Lorentz, Bohr and Einstein.

I have also (like you did) said that people write too much and read too little.

John-Erik

[David de Hilster]

John

I wish you the best. Good luck with your aether!!

David de Hilster
da...@dehilster.com
Cell: 310-991-5744