What's next?

39 views
Skip to first unread message

pbwizard

unread,
Mar 24, 2010, 9:24:13 AM3/24/10
to Now Software
Has anyone tried Filemaker's Bento 3? They're touting that it does
serious integration to iCal & Addressbook databases. Sounds too good
to be true. Maybe I'll download their free demo...

DrFrank

unread,
Mar 24, 2010, 3:44:51 PM3/24/10
to Now Software
On Mar 24, 6:24 am, pbwizard <pbwizard2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone tried Filemaker's Bento 3?

I use a combination of:
- Apple Address Book
- Bento (for custom fields)
http://www.filemaker.com/products/bento/
- BusyCal
http://busymac.com/

I have current versions of Chronos Organizer, Contactizer Pro and
Daylite, but I'm happy with the Address Book, Bento and BusyCal combo.

Wilson Ng

unread,
Mar 25, 2010, 1:40:19 AM3/25/10
to Now Software
I'm actually liking Bento 3..... I think I might just settle on this
for my contacts. It helps that it already has tight integration with
Address Book with the chance to see tasks, events, and e-mails in one
screen.

I'm using the same setup with BusyCal, Bento, and Address Book as
well.....

I do like the customization capabilities of Bento 3.

On Mar 25, 5:44 am, DrFrank <drfranke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 6:24 am, pbwizard <pbwizard2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried Filemaker's Bento 3?
>
> I use a combination of:
> - Apple Address Book
> - Bento (for custom fields)http://www.filemaker.com/products/bento/

> - BusyCalhttp://busymac.com/

watchit

unread,
Mar 25, 2010, 5:02:55 PM3/25/10
to Now Software
I tried BusyCal a while back but decided against it because it did not
support Calendar Groups... I use them extensively in iCal
Does it support them now or is there any way to have groups of
calendars within BusyCal?

ronr

unread,
Mar 25, 2010, 1:18:54 PM3/25/10
to Now Software
How about Bento's ability (or lack of) to set up mass e-mailings by
organizing groups of contacts? I used to do this by NOW's categories
-- AB's only sending by groups doesn't meet my needs. Am wondering if
Bento is really suitable for 'serious' business purposes, under its
pretty face.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages