We have recently upgrade from NW4.11 to NW6. We setup our workstations
through DOS and then load the Microsoft Client for Netware Networks to
attach and login to the network, which then allows us to download any
necessary files (including Client32) and set them up. However, since moving
to NW6, the drive mappings do not appear correctly and we have to do some
manual steps in order to make sure things work the way they used to. We use
a container login script, and we've also copied that to the NET$LOG.DAT file
located in the SYS:PUBLIC folder on the server. We have three drive
mappings: one to the server's VOL1 volume, one to the server's SYS volume
and a search drive to the server's SYS:PUBLIC folder. When I go into Windows
Explorer after logging in, all three drives show up as being mapped to SYS.
If I go to a DOS window, and map the drive manually, the same way the login
script is setup to do, it maps it. The user account has the necessary rights
(read and file scan to necessary folders on the volumes). Here's a copy of
the section of the login script that we're using. I will also put in the
variations I've tried with no success:
* The following lines exit the OS Batch Install User from the login script
IF LOGIN_NAME="INSTUSER" THEN
DOS SET DIRCMD="/P /O:GNE"
DOS SET USER="USER"
MAP INS S1:=<ourservername>\SYS:\PUBLIC
MAP F:=<ourservername>\VOL1:
MAP I:=<ourservername>\SYS:
@I:\PUBLIC\OSSETUP.BAT
EXIT
END
For the each of the drive mappings, we've also tried these variations:
MAP INS S1:=<ourservername>\SYS:PUBLIC
MAP INS S1:=<ourservername>_SYS:\PUBLIC
MAP INS S1:=<ourservername>_SYS:PUBLIC
MAP INS S1:=<ourservername>/SYS:\PUBLIC
MAP INS S1:=<ourservername>/SYS:PUBLIC
And they've all just given us the SYS volume. Not mapping to Public as a
search, or in the line with VOL1, not mapping to VOL1.
Any suggestions/ideas?
Can someone let me know if this client (the one that Microsoft Provides with
Windows 98 2nd Edition) uses the container login script found in NWADMIN, or
the NET$LOG.DAT file so I know where to make changes for this?
Thank you,
Rich