Any thoughts? It's filling up the log file quickly.
And the address reported is that one of a WS or the server?
- Anders Gustafsson, Engineer, CNE6, ASE
NSC Volunteer Sysop
Pedago, The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)
Novell does not monitor these forums officially.
Enhancement requests for all Novell products may be made at
http://support.novell.com/enhancement
Using VA 5.51 build 315 on Windows 2000 build 2600
And the address reported is that one of a WS or the server?
It's an address that I'm not familiar with at all on my network. It's
not an address of any of my Novell servers and the IPX network doesn't
exist here. However, I found another WS and shut it down which solved
the problem. I still am not sure what the address in auditcon is
referring to. It clearly is not an address of any machine on the
network.
Can you tell us the address? Problem with AuditCon is that it can only
decode and display IPX addresses, the address you see is most likely an
IP address.
For an utility we wrote, that can display those addresses correctly, see:
http://www.caledonia.net/setaud.html
0A230BB2:4C802E004300
Network addresses are stored as an array of bytes, ie;
* Network address type - 1 byte
* Network address length - 1 byte
* Network address - variable length
Types are 1=IPX, 2=IP (several other are used as well, ie AFP etc). You
use the type when decoding the address. Problem is that Auditcon only
knows IPX and thus never checks the address type, so in your example it
tries to decode an IP address as an IPX one, ie network:node. The node
part is undefined for an IP address so in your example:
0A230BB2:4C802E004300
0A230BB2 = IP Address
4C802E004300 = Garbage
If you use SetAud, then it decodes those addresses correctly.
- Anders Gustafsson (Sysop)
The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)
Novell has a new enhancement request system,
or what is now known as the requirement portal.
If customers would like to give input in the upcoming
releases of Novell products then they should go to
http://www.novell.com/rms