Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
tcp607j
0 views
Skip to first unread message
jim fixit
Nov 19, 2003, 9:54:50 AM11/19/03
to
Does anyone know of a reason why I should not apply tcp607j on bm3.7
nw6? thx.
nw6? thx.
D. SKye Hodges
Nov 19, 2003, 10:10:55 AM11/19/03
to
because 607k is the new public release, and j opens up proxy on the public interface (jrev2 fixed that)
>>> jim fixit<fixing...@yahoo.com> 2003-11-19 07:54:50 >>>
>>> jim fixit<fixing...@yahoo.com> 2003-11-19 07:54:50 >>>
Craig Johnson
Nov 19, 2003, 10:29:24 AM11/19/03
to
In article <_uLub.4681$I04...@prv-forum2.provo.novell.com>, Jim fixit
wrote:
> Does anyone know of a reason why I should not apply tcp607j on bm3.7
> nw6? thx.
>
Because there are two later revisions release than that? (TCP607K.EXE
is the current version). See tip #1 at the URL below.
wrote:
> Does anyone know of a reason why I should not apply tcp607j on bm3.7
> nw6? thx.
>
is the current version). See tip #1 at the URL below.
Craig Johnson
Novell Support Connection SysOp
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***
0 new messages