Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: How do we override searchsizelimit and searchtimelimit

11 views
Skip to first unread message

David Gersic

unread,
Oct 21, 2009, 3:29:31 PM10/21/09
to
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:06:01 +0000, raj chintalapati wrote:

> Is there anyway to override these system-wide parameters on a
> per-account basis?

TID #10076616 is the reference for what follows.

My own testing says that search limits are bypassed if and only if the
bind user has Inheritted S rights to the NCP Server object. They _must_ be
inherited, not direct. But, the bind user still gets run through the
effective rights calculation. So it's possible to have a user with
limited access to the data, but that still bypasses the search limits.

I've read elsewhere that assigning S [Entry Rights] to the LDAP Group
Object will also bypass the search limits, but I have not confirmed this
myself.


--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Gersic dgersic_@_niu.edu
Novell Knowledge Partner http://forums.novell.com

Please post questions in the newsgroups. No support provided via email.

Jim Willeke

unread,
Oct 22, 2009, 9:13:41 AM10/22/09
to
Typically a savey user can get around these limits anyhow by using the
simple Paged Results control.
-jim


On 10/21/2009 2:06 PM, raj chintalapati wrote:
>
> Hi,


>
> Is there anyway to override these system-wide parameters on a

> per-account basis? Our limits are currently set to 2000 for size limit
> and 300 seconds for time limit. These limits do not apply for admin
> accounts. However, I am looking for ways to override these limits for
> particular user ids (non admin accounts) so that when users bind using
> those specific ids, then they could perform searches without any
> limits.
>
> On Sun directory, these limits could be overridden from system-wide
> limits by adding size and time limit values as attributes to specific
> user entries.
>
> Thanks in advance for any insight.
>
>

0 new messages