i suppose the film retains a small value also because it shows just how far the
american government is willing to go, and that comparatively speaking, they
haven't changed a bit. which some others in the group have already suggested.
from an artisitic point of view the film left a lot to be desired. visually
unremarkable, the characters were unconvincing, billy accepted that he shot his
girlfriend way to easily, mae jumping out of the window was a bid
melodramatic...
i suppose also that the film has some historical significance, given that it
captured 1930's culture(dress, hairstyles, cars, et cetera, et cetera), but
overall the film struck me as uninteresting and somewhat of a laborious watch.
i think that because the plot is based on lies, i had a hard time believing in
the characters, i was unsympathetic to billy's plight, probably because the
conflict--marijuana addiction, which in turn drove everybody insane--is just not
tenable.
but it feels kind of strange critiquing a film that was intentionally created
for propaganda purposes, because it's too easy to find flaws. everytime i think
of something about the film, i find myself saying, 'well what did you expect.' for the time that is spent watching this film, the dividends are low, and thus, i have no choice but to point the thumbs down on 'Reefer Madness'.
reese
--
Brian Slaughter
***SuperStar***
"Do not arouse the wrath of the great and powerful Oz!"