On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:45 AM, jason pellerin <
jpel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks and sorry for taking so long to write back. I definitely will take
> any help you have to give. :) Sadly what nose *really* needs is a new
> primary maintainer, since neither I nor Kumar really have the time anymore
> to handle it. But that's sort of a giant step.
No worries Jason! I know we're all pressed for time.
I don't know if I'm ready to be the primary maintainer just yet, but
I've certainly gotten to know the internals. We're building a system
test tool for a system used to position antennas, and have gotten to
re-experience some of nose's strengths, and some of its weaknesses as
well.
> So, any time at all that you have to read and comment on pull requests would
> be very helpful -- it often takes me a week or more just to look at a new
> one, and even good ones tend to linger for a long time before getting
> merged.
Sure thing. Is there some way I can mark ones that I think are ready
for merge? Would you like me to stage them somewhere?
> Or if you want to try to fix that one pesky timing test that sometimes fails
> on travisci, that would be really helpful because we'd be able to trust the
> tests again.
I'll take a stab at it. I pushed up one potential fix. I think I'm
going to have to install PyPy to find the other.
> For nose2, the thing needed most right now is more users, so if you haven't
> tried it out on a real project, try it out!
I'll take a look when I get a chance!
-John