Before there is a piling on towards ebird, I'm wondering if the confusion isn't about how ebird operates. I think some of the confusion has occurred b/c LBBG is no longer considered a rare bird in Suffolk County, and as a result, it does not make the daily summary of rare birds sighted. The reason LBBG isn't a rare bird in Suffolk is that it is now often the most common gull during parts of the year, especially along the South Shore. For example, I counted 49 at Mecox last October, and a whopping 220 at Sagaponack in August 2024. And BTW, I easily found Rich's sightings of LBBG from Orient when I searched for them, so they have become part of the ebird database, they just were not listed on the rare birds page.
The only time records are judged are when they trip the rarity filter or the high count filter. In that case, an unpaid volunteer, who spends hundreds of hours a year reviewing ebird records, requires evidence that the sighting is correct. If the evidence is not convincing, then the record remains in ebird, but is considered unverified. What else would you want ebird to do? Suppose someone starts reporting Lark Bunting or Scaled Antpitta without evidence, what should be done about records like those? I understand why ebird doesn't want those becoming part of the scientific record. As a researcher who uses citizen science (iNat) in my research, I spend too much time culling poorly verified and obviously incorrect records to make up my dataset.
So, I'd be interested to hear how ebird is failing in its mission. And I encourage you all to use ebird bc it is an incredible tool. If you use it to find rare birds, it seems reasonable that you should contribute to the database.
Hugh