Just to underline: SuperMondays is also keen to support more
workshops, so that's another way to publicise and to get support.
What's your thoughts on "class size"? My personal preference is to
keep numbers low so as to encourage more informality, flexibility, and
more interaction, say around 10 people. (For me, many more than this
and I risk going back into university lecture mode...)
So, I'd prefer (say) two events with 10 people to one event with 20
people. I would also expect ticket price to vary inversely with class
size, so asking more for a smaller group size since (I believe) the
experience will be more useful - eg able to cater more for
individuals' needs, possibility of deeper learning.
In the ideal world, it'd be great to do one-to-one teaching, but this
will generally be too expensive. So, we're always looking to find a
good compromise between costs and outcomes, and work within what the
"market" will support. [1]
I think there's also room for open discussion and negotiation about
costs, ie maybe a cost can be proposed initially for a workshop and
some justification presented, then it's up to customers and providers
to negotiate on a final price.
Bit of a ramble here, but main points are: think about varying class
size, think about how to link pricing to this, and maybe be open to
negotiation over the price so you can fit the market.
Paul
[1] It's interesting to consider how economics affects teaching in
universities: there too, it's a balancing act, and in the current
climate the balancing is getting harder - which has implications for
the quality of learning. That's one reason why I'm keen on exploring
alternatives!