Yeti originates from mentally unbalanced individuals

[j22...@gmail.com]

The phenomenon that we call yeti or bigfoot today was for the first
time covered in the press in 1954 when the Daily Mail journalists
organized a mission to the Himalayas. Locals said there was some
humanlike tousled being lounging about the mountains; they called the
being "an abominable snowman". The quick-witted British journalists
borrowed the name and translated it into English.

Since that, people who believe in yeti have gathered so much evidence
that it allows them to state that this creature actually exists.
Hominologists, experts who study the yeti phenomenon, say that much
evidence provided by eyewitnesses observing yeti is the number one
argument proving the hominid is real. Evidence reported by different
eyewitnesses often resemble each other. On the other hand, these
experts state that yetis are particularly cautious and do not let
people see them. In addition to the evidence of eyewitnesses, hominid
researchers have gathered a large collection of hair and faeces and
even a foot that are said to be part of yeti. They say that analysis
of the hair DNA revealed the hair belonged to some primate, of which
science has no notion. The hominologist archives include some pictures
of hominids and even a 960-shot film made by American Roger Patterson
in 1967. The film shows a large being covered with hair all over the
body that is walking about American woods. Various experts,
criminologists and zoologists among them, have not yet identified the
creature in the film, but it seems to be resembling none of known
primate kinds. Until recently, the official science has been ignoring
the stories of annoying enthusiasts saying they saw unknown primates.
Biologists are sure that any relic specimen of human being's ancestors
- Australopithecus, Neanderthal man and other Sinanthropus - could
hardly survive till today. To maintain the population of such
creatures their number must be considerable enough. However, yeti is
still a rare phenomenon indeed. It is also unlikely that some unknown
primates may be developing close to human beings. People often compare
yeti with some traditional folklore character, the spirit of woods or
a wood-goblin. But the official science waves the comparison aside: it
insists that a wood-goblin is rather a non-material power that takes
various forms just for a while. That is why hominids cannot be
considered wood-goblins who are rather fairytale characters.
Otherwise, hominologists must prove that either a wood-goblin actually
exists as species or admit that yeti is the result of people's
imagination. Several months ago, respectable Russian biologists made a
hypothesis as concerning the present-day origin of yeti. Audacious
researchers state that the unknown primate is a wild retard or his
retarded descendants. We know from history that retarded people often
sought isolation from the society, consequently soon lost all habits
typical of the society in general and turned into real "snowmen."
Russian classical writer Ivan Turgenev told a story about such a
creature that he came across. Locals in some place in Russia
remembered a crazy woman; she escaped to the woods when got absolutely
insane and got really wild but still remained incredibly strong. The
writer said he met the creature while hunting in the woods in that
area. Therefore, the yeti phenomenon may be no evolution at all but a
mere degradation of ordinary people into apelike creatures. Utro