Re: [noop-changes] [noop] 3 new revisions pushed by aeagle22206 on 2009-12-09 16:21 GMT
Christian Edward Gruber
me. :-)
Anyway, +1 (I'll vote for real later)
BTW, I have gotten further with making maven work, and will push in
the next day or so, but I'm going to back out of making the .yml the
canonical. The script is there, and people can use .yml if they want,
but .xml is the canonical form of maven, the embedder, and therefore
all the tool integration. Despite the thought that YAML may be
supported first-class in the future - it's an amorphous future, and
dependencies won't change that much when we're further into the project.
cheers,
Christian.
On Dec 9, 2009, at 4:22 PM, no...@googlecode.com wrote:
> 3 new revisions:
>
> Revision: 8c50d22090
> Author: Alex Eagle <aeagl...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 8 22:10:20 2009
> Log: Move grammar to its own subproject. Per my last blog post, I'm
> playing...
> http://code.google.com/p/noop/source/detail?r=8c50d22090
>
> Revision: 30b8981b7b
> Author: Alex Eagle <aeagl...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed Dec 9 00:03:18 2009
> Log: Break the interpreter dependency on the grammar, maybe can load
> source...
> http://code.google.com/p/noop/source/detail?r=30b8981b7b
>
Alex Eagle
+1 on going back to xml pom. The convenience of yaml is small and the pain is significant. Interesting notion to try later when its supported.
Note that my change here is on a non default branch: byog "bring your own grammar". Ill send a proposal in a bit.
Also idea9 was released, and the scala plugin is working better, I can finally run tests again. Recommend it.
-Alex
On Dec 9, 2009 8:39 AM, "Christian Edward Gruber" <christiane...@gmail.com> wrote:
Crap! I had a similar change I was noodling with, and you scooped me. :-)
Anyway, +1 (I'll vote for real later)
BTW, I have gotten further with making maven work, and will push in the next day or so, but I'm going to back out of making the .yml the canonical. The script is there, and people can use .yml if they want, but .xml is the canonical form of maven, the embedder, and therefore all the tool integration. Despite the thought that YAML may be supported first-class in the future - it's an amorphous future, and dependencies won't change that much when we're further into the project.
cheers,
Christian.
On Dec 9, 2009, at 4:22 PM, no...@googlecode.com wrote: > 3 new revisions: > > Revision: 8c50d2209...
Christian Edward Gruber
+1 on going back to xml pom. The convenience of yaml is small and the pain is significant. Interesting notion to try later when its supported.
Note that my change here is on a non default branch: byog "bring your own grammar". Ill send a proposal in a bit.
Also idea9 was released, and the scala plugin is working better, I can finally run tests again. Recommend it.