But, for practical reasons we have to acknowledge that the node list
needs to remain, mostly, about node.js and relate to the issues and
concerns of it's users.
Some quick and dirty math shows that of ~200 messages in the last 4
days, 53% of those messages relate to a discussion about an alternative
SSJS concurrency model that is not, and will not, be part of node.js.
One thread has served to dominate nearly half the mailing list traffic
with the majority of messages sent by only 4 "users" (in quotes because
they don't actually use node.js).
This is a good discussion, it should continue, a community should be
built around these ideas and a possible implementation, but out of
respect for the people on this list that really are using node and now
having a higher signal to noise ratio than they can possibly handle
please move that discussion to another forum.
I've created a Google Group for you
http://groups.google.com/group/javascript-coro , I'm happy to hand the
admin duties to someone else. Use it, or don't and use something else.
I have no ability to ban a discussion or set rules and codes of conduct,
nor would I want to establish a rule that excludes a particular set of
people or ideas. I'm just asking that out of respect for the people who
are doing real work with node.js and need to stay apprized of issues,
answer questions and ask them, please move this discussion and build a
community elsewhere.
-Mikeal
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en.
>
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en.
2011/1/21 Marco Rogers <marco....@gmail.com>:
+12 in favor of putting coroutines into node, +10 in favor of never
talking about coroutines ever again, and +3 in favor of using Rhino.
dictatorship++
--i