Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Deconstructing Social realism: Structuralist subtextual theory and constructivism

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Karl Ove Hufthammer

unread,
Oct 11, 2002, 8:48:55 AM10/11/02
to
1. Contexts of meaninglessness

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the distinction
between destruction and creation. Sontag promotes the use of
structuralist subtextual theory to challenge and modify class.
Therefore, constructivism implies that consciousness, perhaps
paradoxically, has objective value.

Lacan uses the term 'dialectic capitalism' to denote not
discourse, but postdiscourse. However, the premise of Derridaist
reading holds that truth is intrinsically used in the service of
sexism.

An abundance of desituationisms concerning constructivism may be
found. It could be said that Sontag suggests the use of dialectic
capitalism to deconstruct the status quo.

2. Constructivism and subconceptualist libertarianism

"Sexual identity is meaningless," says Derrida; however, according
to Finnis[1] , it is not so much sexual identity that is
meaningless, but rather the rubicon, and eventually the fatal
flaw, of sexual identity. Porter[2] suggests that we have to
choose between structuralist subtextual theory and subcapitalist
cultural theory. However, many narratives concerning the
difference between narrativity and society exist.

"Sexuality is fundamentally responsible for class divisions," says
Debord. Sartre promotes the use of subconceptualist libertarianism
to challenge sexual identity. It could be said that if
structuralist subtextual theory holds, we have to choose between
subconceptualist libertarianism and premodernist deappropriation.

Derrida uses the term 'structuralist subtextual theory' to denote
not, in fact, patriarchialism, but neopatriarchialism. But the
subject is contextualised into a textual theory that includes
reality as a reality.

The characteristic theme of McElwaine's[3] critique of
subconceptualist libertarianism is the bridge between class and
society. Thus, Bataille's essay on structuralist subtextual theory
implies that class has significance, but only if constructivism is
valid; if that is not the case, Foucault's model of structuralist
subtextual theory is one of "the precultural paradigm of
narrative", and hence part of the economy of culture. Any number
of materialisms concerning subconceptualist libertarianism may be
revealed. However, the subject is interpolated into a
constructivism that includes language as a paradox.

Several theories concerning the role of the reader as artist
exist. In a sense, the premise of subconceptualist libertarianism
states that the law is intrinsically impossible.

1. Finnis, I. F. ed. (1989) Structuralist subtextual theory in the
works of Gibson. Schlangekraft

2. Porter, N. W. D. (1973) Realities of Dialectic: Constructivism
and structuralist subtextual theory. Loompanics

3. McElwaine, U. ed. (1980) Debordist image, libertarianism and
constructivism. And/Or Press

Dette til orientering.

--
Karl Ove Hufthammer

Joachim Vorland

unread,
Oct 11, 2002, 8:51:58 AM10/11/02
to
Karl Ove Hufthammer <nj...@huftis.org> skreiv i innlegget news:Xns92A496B2...@ID-99504.news.dfncis.de:

hjkgkhg hghj nj hjkgh hjg hkjg hjkghg hjg hghj gjgjg hjg hu ghj hjk gkjhg kg hjkghjg hjg hgg kjghj gkhglhjg ljkgj ljhg
hljgljkhghugghklgh ghjkg

--
Joachim Vorland
Trondheim

Karl Ove Hufthammer

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 7:02:35 AM10/27/02
to
Karl Ove Hufthammer <nj...@huftis.org> skreiv i innlegget
news:Xns92A496B2...@ID-99504.news.dfncis.de:

> 1. Contexts of meaninglessness

Svarar på mitt eiga innlegg for å samanlikna klokka.

--
Karl Ove Hufthammer

Karl Ove Hufthammer

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 7:03:58 AM10/27/02
to
Karl Ove Hufthammer <nj...@huftis.org> skreiv i innlegget
news:Xns92B484AD...@ID-99504.news.dfncis.de:

> Svarar på mitt eiga innlegg for å samanlikna klokka.

Før -- no:

Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:48:55 +0200
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:02:35 +0100

+0100 -- det er vel rett -- eller?

--
Karl Ove Hufthammer

Morten Øen

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 6:09:45 AM10/27/02
to
Karl Ove Hufthammer <nj...@huftis.org> skreiv 27.10 13:03 i no.test...

> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:48:55 +0200
> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:02:35 +0100

Ja. For +0200 og +0100 refererar til det me før i verda kalla GMT, som er
uendra òg ved sommartid.

--
Morten
Newsarar mot X-No-Archive

Ein vanleg feil mange gjer er å lese n.a.f før dei les andre grupper.

Morten Øen

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 6:11:01 AM10/27/02
to
"Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:09 i no.test...

> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:09:45 +0200

Hm...

Morten Øen

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 6:11:34 AM10/27/02
to
"Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:11 i no.test...

> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:11:01 +0200

Må ein restarte Win for at Xnews skal få med seg det her, tru?

Morten Øen

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 6:17:32 AM10/27/02
to
"Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:11 i no.test...

> "Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:11 i no.test...
>
>> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:11:01 +0200
>
> Må ein restarte Win for at Xnews skal få med seg det her, tru?

*reboot*

Test

Morten Øen

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 6:17:50 AM10/27/02
to
"Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:17 i no.test...

> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:17:32 +0200

Nei?

Trygve Fossan

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 7:52:18 AM10/27/02
to
"Morten Řen" <me...@chello.no> wrote in news:Xns92B487499E287mortenoen@
217.31.96.195:

> "Morten Řen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:17 i no.test...


>
>> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:17:32 +0200
>
> Nei?

test


--
Trygve
84.GL-12.S DoD#TRY-1

"Cum grand salis"

Trygve Fossan

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 7:55:22 AM10/27/02
to
Trygve Fossan <news1-...@chello.no> wrote in
news:Xns92B48D559DD95n...@news.chello.no:

> "Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> wrote in news:Xns92B487499E287mortenoen@
> 217.31.96.195:
>
>> "Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:17 i no.test...


>>
>>> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:17:32 +0200
>>
>> Nei?
>
> test

13.56

Karl Ove Hufthammer

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 8:33:26 AM10/27/02
to
"Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv i innlegget
news:Xns92B487499...@217.31.96.195:

>> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:17:32 +0200
>
> Nei?

Du har kryssa av for 'Juster for sommertid'?

--
Karl Ove Hufthammer

Morten Øen

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 11:56:48 AM10/27/02
to
"Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:17 i no.test...

> "Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv 27.10 12:17 i no.test...
>
>> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:17:32 +0200
>
> Nei?

No?

Morten Øen

unread,
Oct 27, 2002, 11:57:57 AM10/27/02
to
Karl Ove Hufthammer <nj...@huftis.org> skreiv 27.10 14:33 i no.test...

> "Morten Øen" <me...@chello.no> skreiv i innlegget
> news:Xns92B487499...@217.31.96.195:
>
>>> Date: 27 Oct 2002 13:17:32 +0200
>>
>> Nei?
>
> Du har kryssa av for 'Juster for sommertid'?

Eg hadde så. Veit ikkje kva som gjorde det, men no er det i orden, ser
det ut til...

Karl Ove Hufthammer

unread,
Oct 31, 2002, 10:50:02 AM10/31/02
to
Karl Ove Hufthammer <nj...@huftis.org> wrote in
news:Xns92B484EA...@ID-99504.news.dfncis.de:

> Karl Ove Hufthammer <nj...@huftis.org> skreiv i innlegget
> news:Xns92B484AD...@ID-99504.news.dfncis.de:
>
>> Svarar på mitt eiga innlegg for å samanlikna klokka.

Og testar no copyfups. Dette blir gøy!

--
Karl Ove Hufthammer

Karl Ove Hufthammer

unread,
Oct 31, 2002, 10:57:28 AM10/31/02
to
Karl Ove Hufthammer <nj...@huftis.org> skreiv i innlegget
news:Xns92B8AB3C...@ID-99504.news.dfncis.de:

> Og testar no copyfups. Dette blir gøy!

Kjempegøy! No slepp eg å lesa alle (dei altfor mange!) gruppene eg
abonnerer på, og kan avgrensa meg til berre å lesa innlegg som
er svar på mine innlegg. :)

--
Karl Ove Hufthammer

0 new messages