I rather would say : Why is kaSStro not in the list...but
anyways it means the same for quite a lot of people...even if Cuba and its
people are one other thing and the tyrann is another one.
Chretien and other Prime ministers of Canada always assumed
they could influence on KaSStro...what a laugh !
I wrote my opinions to this effect about that in one of the most
respectable newspapers of Canada...but of no avail...they seemed
at the public Function and Prime minister office not willing to understand
those point I pointed to them...
Now the Chretien office has realized that they ,and also the technocrats in
the different government Depts., were totally mistaken about the real nature
and the true methods of that tyranny in Cuba.
They probably didn't beleive that they were dealing with a mafiosi or
gangster not with a politician...
From: PL <
P...@pandora.be>
Subject: Why Cuba is not on
the A list
Date: Sunday, March 25, 2001 4:17 PM
Why Cuba is not on the
A list
National Post
When the Summit of the Americas takes place
in Quebec City next month, only
one nation in the Western Hemisphere will be
excluded: Cuba. The omission is
worth noting. Though Cuba is a dictatorship
that has been suspended from the
Organization of American States since 1962,
many countries have made great
efforts over the years to rehabilitate the
nation's diplomatic standing. The
romantic view that Fidel Castro, Cuba's
dictator, is simply a people's
revolutionary who ran afoul of the United
States is remarkably stubborn.
Witness the apparently serious gesture of
Hallgeir Langeland, a Norwegian
parliamentarian, who has nominated the
dictator for the 2001 Nobel Peace
Prize.
Canada has been among the
world's worst offenders in this respect. At the
1994 Summit of the Americas
in Miami, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien said it
was hypocritical for the OAS
to exclude Cuba. In 1998, he personally visited
Cuba and said he would like
Mr. Castro to attend the 2001 Summit of the
Americas. In 1999, he declared
the nation should be welcomed into the "gran
familia" of the Americas. But on
Thursday, John Manley, Canada's Minister of
Foreign Affairs, told a
parliamentary committee that he agrees Mr. Castro
should be barred from
attending next month's meeting in Quebec City. "Cuba
is not ready to
participate in the summit," Mr. Manley said, "because it
lacks a commitment
to democratic principles."
Mr. Manley's statement is part of a welcome
trend. In the last two years,
Canada's relationship with Mr. Castro has
cooled considerably. It has become
obvious to Ottawa that its policy of
engaging the Havana regime has had
little, if any, positive impact on human
rights. According to Human Rights
Watch, "Despite a few positive developments
... the Cuban government's human
rights practices [are] generally arbitrary
and repressive. Hundreds of
peaceful opponents of the government remained
behind bars, and many more
were subject to short-term detentions, house
arrest, surveillance, arbitrary
searches, evictions, travel restrictions,
politically motivated dismissals
from employment, threats and other forms of
harassment." Cuba is different
from such countries as Haiti and Colombia,
which have poor human rights
records but at least embrace democracy in
theory. Under Mr. Castro's
Communist regime, there is no freedom of the
press, and political dissidents
are routinely imprisoned, including four who
were sentenced to lengthy jail
terms in 1999 despite Mr. Chrétien's
personally voiced protests.
There was a time when Cuba was just one of
many Latin American
dictatorships. Now, however, it sticks out like a sore
thumb. In Quebec
City, members of the OAS are expected to consider making
adherence to
democratic principles a prerequisite for OAS membership. It is
also expected
that dictatorships such as Cuba will be excluded from the free
trade
agreement -- the Free Trade Area of the Americas -- that delegates
will
discuss. Those who still doubt the link between globalization and
democracy
should take a good look at the vignette that plays out in Quebec
City. While
his democratic neighbours build a trade framework that benefits
every nation
in the Western Hemisphere save his, Mr. Castro will be stewing,
by himself,
in Havana.
http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?f=/stories/20010319/504470.html