From: A. Jawien <
skept...@my-deja.com>
Subject:
Amnesty International - Prisoners of conscience: New convictions overshadow
releases
Date: Saturday, March 24, 2001 5:20 PM
CUBA
Prisoners
of conscience: New convictions overshadow releases
http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/Index/AMR250212000?OpenDocument&of=COUNTRIES\CUBA
I.
INTRODUCTION
Currently several hundred people, 21 of whom have been
identified by Amnesty
International as prisoners of conscience detained for
peaceful exercise of
the freedom of expression, association or assembly, are
imprisoned for
political offences in Cuba.(1) In addition to these prisoners
of conscience,
Amnesty International continues to be concerned at the severe
harassment to
which dissidents, including journalists, members of political
organizations
and human rights advocates, are subjected. (For the most recent
public
information on specific incidents of harassment, see Amnesty
International's
report ''Cuba: short term detention and harassment of
dissidents'' (AMR
25/04/00), of March 2000. This practice is ongoing, and
Amnesty
International continues to monitor it closely although such
information is
not included in the scope of the present
report.)
Repression of dissent has a long history in Cuba. The Cuban
Government has
traditionally argued that it is justified in depriving
dissidents of
fundamental freedoms of expression, association and assembly in
order to
maintain the unity of the country against hostile forces abroad.(2)
In
response to this argument, Amnesty International has maintained that
all
states, irrespective of any external threat, the political character of
the
government concerned or any other situation-specific factors, are
under
obligation to fulfil the duties laid out in the Universal Declaration
of
Human Rights, including the duty to respect fundamental freedoms.
Therefore,
Amnesty International protests against the human rights violations
covered
by its mandate in all countries where they occur.
In Cuba,
repression of dissent is legitimised by the Constitution and the
Penal Code.
Some offences against state security, such as ''propaganda
enemiga'', ''enemy
propaganda'', as well as offences against authority, such
as ''desacato'',
''disrespect'', have been widely applied to silence
critics. Others, like
''peligrosidad'', ''dangerousness'', are ill-defined
and open to
politically-motivated misuse. At times dissidents have been
convicted of
criminal offences, believed to have been fabricated in order to
discredit
them or their organization or in retaliation for peaceful
expression of their
beliefs.
Detained dissidents are at times held for long periods without
trial, or are
convicted after procedures that do not meet international
standards for fair
trial due to issues involving the independence and
impartiality of the
judiciary and the access of the accused to defence
counsel.
II. PRISONERS OF CONSCIENCE RELEASED CONDITIONALLY OR AFTER
EXPIRY OF THEIR
SENTENCE
Nine prisoners of conscience have been
released since the beginning of 2000.
Amnesty International notes these
releases and renews its call for the Cuban
government to unconditionally
release all remaining prisoners of conscience
and to stop detaining citizens
for the peaceful exercise of fundamental
freedoms.
One of the releases
came after the person concerned had completed his prison
term. Víctor Rolando
Arroyo Carmona, a journalist, was sentenced to six
months' imprisonment in
January 2000 for collecting toys which he planned to
give away to children.
His home was reportedly searched by State Security
officers who confiscated
toys paid for with money raised by Cuban exile
groups in Miami as part of a
Christmas appeal called Proyecto Reyes Magos
del Milenio, the Millennium
Three Wise Men Project. Víctor Rolando Arroyo
was subsequently convicted and
sentenced for ''acaparamiento'', ''hoarding''
(Article 230 of the Cuban Penal
Code).
Amnesty International believes that his conviction was motivated
by his work
for the independent press agency Unión de Periodistas y
Escritores Cubanos
Independientes, Union of Cuban Independent Journalists and
Writers, and his
links with Miami exile groups opposed to the government.
Víctor Rolando
Arroyo had been previously jailed for one year and nine months
in 1996, for
''desacato'', ''disrespect'', reportedly after an incident
involving a
policeman. His arrest in January took place during a period of
clampdown on
dissidents, in the aftermath of the Ibero-American Summit in
Havana.
Víctor Rolando Arroyo was released in July after serving the full
six months
of his sentence.
Several other releases came before
completion of the individuals' prison
sentences, and were termed 'conditional
releases' by the authorities.(3) In
May prisoners of conscience Marta Beatriz
Roque, Felix Bonne Carcasés and
René Gómez Manzano, three members of the
so-called "Group of Four", were
released. The four members of the Grupo de
Trabajo de la Disidencia Interna
para el Análisis de la Situación
Socio-Económica Cubana (The Internal
Dissidents Working Group for the
Analysis of the Cuban Socio-Economic
Situation) who had been held in custody
since July 1997, were sentenced amid
much national and international protest
to between three and a half and five
years' imprisonment on a charge of
''otros actos contra la seguridad del
estado'', ''other acts against state
security'' (Article 125(c) of the Cuban
Penal Code) in relation to a charge
of ''sedición'', ''sedition'' (Article
100 (c) of the Cuban Penal
Code).
The fourth member of the group, Vladimiro Roca Antúnez, remains in
prison.
On the eve of the third anniversary of his detention in July the
three
former prisoners of conscience held a press conference at which they
called
for his immediate release.
Orestes Rodríguez Horruitiner was
placed on conditional release on 7 April
2000. He had been sentenced to four
years' imprisonment in 1997 for
''propaganda enemiga'', ''enemy propaganda''
(Article 103 of the Cuban Penal
Code), reportedly after authorities
confiscated some publications from his
home.
Several other prisoners
of conscience were released after long periods
without ever having been
tried. Such detention without trial contravenes the
international prohibition
on arbitrary deprivation of liberty laid out in
article 9 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights and article 25 of the
American Declaration of the
Rights and Duties of Man, among other
instruments.(4)
Maritza Lugo
Fernández, vice-president of the illegal Partido Democrático 30
de Noviembre
''Frank País'', Frank País 30 November Democratic Party, was
arrested on 23
December 1999. She planned to participate in a religious
procession to
celebrate Christmas but was detained along with six others,
all of whom were
released within a few days.
Maritza Lugo, who was detained on eleven
different occasions in 1999, went
on two hunger strikes to protest her arrest
and continued detention without
official charge. She was eventually charged
with ''desórdenes públicos'',
''public disorder'' (Articles 200-201 of the
Cuban Penal Code), but was not
tried; she was released on 1 June, over five
months after her arrest.
According to some sources, the charge against her
still stands. Amnesty
International has received reports that Maritza Lugo
has been briefly
re-detained and interrogated since this most recent release,
and continues
to monitor her situation closely.
Angel Moya Acosta and
the brothers Guido and Ariel Sigler Amaya, all members
of the illegal
Movimiento Opción Alternativa, Alternative Option Movement,
were detained on
15 December 1999 after they participated in a peaceful
demonstration in Pedro
Betancourt village, Matanzas province, on 10 December
to celebrate the 51st
anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. Although they were
charged with ''resistencia'', ''resistance''
(Article 143 of the Cuban Penal
Code), ''desórdenes públicos'', ''public
disorder'' (Articles 200-201 of the
Cuban Penal Code), and ''instigación a
delinquir'', ''instigation to commit a
crime'', (Article 202 of the Cuban
Penal Code) no trial or sentencing ever
took place. According to statements
made by Angel Moya Acosta since his
release, the peaceful demonstration was
broken up by members of the Brigadas
de Respuesta Rapida under the
instruction of members of the Buró Municipal
del Partido Comunista.
Guido Sigler Amaya was transferred from prison to
house arrest on 10 June,
and was freed on 9 July. Ariel Sigler Amaya was
freed on 5 August and Angel
Moya Acosta, on 7 August. In an interview after
his release, Angel Moya
Acosta reportedly said ''no queremos violencia, no
practicamos la violencia,
no queremos anarquía, pero sí somos partidarios de
la desobediencia civil
como método pacífico para obligar al gobierno a
reconocer nuestros derechos
y libertades fundamentales'' (''we neither want
nor practice violence, we
don't want anarchy; but we do believe in civil
disobedience as a pacific
method to make the government recognize our
fundamental rights and
freedoms.'')(5)
III. POLITICALLY MOTIVATED
ARRESTS CONTINUE; NEW CASES OF PRISONERS OF
CONSCIENCE
In July Nestor
Rodríguez Lobaina, president of the unofficial Cuban Youth
Movement for
Democracy [for tr: Movimiento de Jóvenes Cubanos por la
Democracia], was
convicted in court of ''desacato'',''disrespect'' (Article
144 of the Cuban
Penal Code), ''desórdenes públicos'', ''public disorder''
(Articles 200-201
of the Cuban Penal Code) and ''daños'', ''damages''
(Article 339 of the Cuban
Penal Code). Eddy Alfredo Mena y González, another
member of the movement,
also stood trial with him on the same charges. The
prosecution had called for
sentences of 4 years 3 months for Nestor
Rodríguez and 10 years for Eddy
Alfredo Mena; Nestor Rodríguez was sentenced
to six years and two months,
while Eddy Alfredo Mena was sentenced to five
years and one month. Amnesty
International believes that the two have been
imprisoned due to the
non-violent exercise of the rights to freedom of
expression and association,
and calls for their unconditional release as
prisoners of
conscience.
Due to his opposition to the Cuban government, Nestor
Rodríguez Lobaina has
been arrested and imprisoned on a number of occasions.
In 1996 he was
arrested following peaceful attempts to organize a movement
for university
reform. After a summary trial in which he did not have access
to defence
counsel, he was sentenced to 12 months' restricted liberty, as
well as to
five years' ''banishment'' to his home town, on charges of
''resisting
authority'' and ''disrespect''. In 1997, he was again arrested
and sentenced
to 18 months' imprisonment, on the same charges as before,
after criticizing
the Fourteenth Youth and Student Festival scheduled for
later that year in
Cuba. He was detained again in December 1998, July 1999
and was last
arrested in connection to the current case against him on 2
March 2000.
There were new developments in the case of Dr. Oscar Elías
Biscet González,
president of the Fundación Lawton de Derechos Humanos,
Lawton Foundation for
Human Rights, a humanitarian organization considered
illegal by the Cuban
authorities, was sentenced to three years' imprisonment
on 25 February 2000.
He was initially arrested on 3 November 1999 and charged
with ''ultraje a
los símbolos de la patria'', ''insult to the symbols of the
homeland''
(article 203 of the Cuban Penal Code), which carries a maximum
sentence of
one year's imprisonment. The charge was reportedly brought
against him
because he hung a Cuban flag sideways on his balcony during a
press
conference at his home on 28 October 1999. (See ''Eleven remain in
detention
following government crackdown on dissent during the Ibero-American
Summit
in Havana,'' AMR 25/02/00, of 31 January 2000). The prosecutor's
petition
against him, issued in February 2000, included two further
charges:
''desórdenes públicos'', ''public disorder'', (Articles 200-201 of
the Cuban
Penal Code)and ''instigación a delinquir'', ''instigation to commit
a
crime'' (Article 202 of the Cuban Penal Code). Dr Biscet, who denied
all
these charges, said that he hung the flag in that manner as a means
of
non-violent protest. He was found guilty on all three counts.
IV.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CUBAN GOVERNMENT
Amnesty International urges the
Cuban Government:
. To release immediately and unconditionally all those
detained or
imprisoned solely for peacefully exercising their rights to
freedom of
expression, association and assembly;
. To bring Cuban
legislation into line with international human rights
standards, particularly
those regarding the exercise of the above-mentioned
fundamental freedoms, so
that the human rights of all Cubans are protected;
. To grant full
judicial guarantees for a fair trial, in accordance with
international human
rights standards, including immediate access to a lawyer
of their choice, to
all those who remain in detention and are accused of
politically-motivated
offences;
. To cease immediately all forms of intimidation and harassment
directed
towards dissidents who are seeking solely to exercise their
fundamental
human rights as established in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights.
****
(1) Amnesty International is aware that there may
well be additional such
prisoners of conscience in Cuba, and is in the
process of verifying
information with regard to several ongoing cases not
mentioned in the
present report.
(2) The United States of America's
embargo against Cuba has been repeatedly
condemned by the United Nations
General Assembly. While Amnesty
International's mandate does not permit it to
take a position on this or any
other type of sanction, the organization
recognizes that the embargo has
increased hardship within Cuba and added to
the economic difficulties faced
by the country, while at the same time its
very existence continues to be
used by the authorities as justification for
continued repression of
dissent. The most recent example of this is the
February 1999 adoption of
Law 88, the Law for the Protection of the National
Independence and Economy
of Cuba [for tr: "Ley de Protección de la
Independencia Nacional y la
Economía de Cuba"]. This law allows for penalties
of up to 20 years'
imprisonment for activities viewed as supporting the
embargo. These
activities, as laid out in the law, include providing
information to the US
government; owning, distributing or reproducing
material produced by the US
government or any other foreign entity; and
collaborating, by any means,
with foreign radio, television, press or other
foreign media, with the
purpose of destabilizing the country and destroying
the socialist state.
(3) 'Libertad condicional' is provided for under article
58 of the Cuban
Penal Code. According to the Code, early release can be
obtained after a
third of the sentence when the inmate is under 20; after one
half of the
sentence for older first-time offenders; after two-thirds of the
sentence
for older recidivists; or in extraordinary circumstances.
(4) The
United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) has
established
criteria for determining when detention is arbitrary. These
criteria include
when there is no legal grounds for detention; when the
deprivation of freedom
relates to the exercise of certain freedoms or rights
protected by
international law; or when the right to fair trial has not
been
respected.
(5) Reported via CubaNet posting, 9 August 2000.
http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/Index/AMR250212000?OpenDocument&of=COUNTRIES\CUBA