Dear nmrML developers and interested parties.
I wonder if someone could provide me with a suitable contact email to approch the main NMR vendors (Bruker and Agilent/Varian).
I have so far send the email below to Hartmut Schaefer from Bruker and to agilent customer care .
I think if we would sent our term request to one person more for each vendor, we should be safe to receive feedback.
The question is who would be the suitable contact person from these vendors ?
Best regards,
Daniel Schober
-----
Dear [Vendor] representatives,
I am contacting you as a developer of a new open NMR data standard called nmrML (http://nmrml.org), which is currently being developed under the auspices of the COSMOS EU project (http://www.cosmos-fp7.eu) .
The XML based exchange and storage syntax will consist of an XML schema definition and a controlled vocabulary/ontology, the latter to capture the more variant terms to be used for annotation within nmrML.xml data files.
We like to add to our controlled vocabulary a list or hierarchy of terms describing
- nmr probes with diameters
We would be very greatful if you could provide us with a list or is-a-hierarchy (taxonomy) of terms in the mentioned classes from your product spectrum.
Best regards,
Daniel Schober ( for COSMOS nmrML work package)
--------------
PS: To guide you in what we would be interested in, you could look at the following descriptions, we discussed on our git repository issue tracker:
NMR pulse sequences:
https://github.com/nmrML/nmrML/issues/49
https://github.com/nmrML/nmrML/issues/40
NMR instruments:
https://github.com/nmrML/nmrML/issues/52
NMR Probes:
https://github.com/nmrML/nmrML/issues/54
https://github.com/nmrML/nmrML/issues/53