Hello Nashville Linux Users Group,Our hosting provider is scheduled to shut down on April 1st, giving you almost a month to find a new host for the nlug.wikispot.org data. This should not be an issue. If you need assistance with this, please let me know, I will try to help as best I can.I sent Philip Neustrom a reply thanking for allowing us to have our data on his server.Thank you very much,Kevin Eldridge
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to nlug...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nlug-talk+...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nlug-talk+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I just renewed the meetup.com membership for another 6 months.
Also, I'd be happy to get a VPS to put NLUG on, but I'd really like to
have a meeting regarding possibly building a new website.
I have time next week.
I wouldn't be opposed to this option either.
I already proposed a different option. We should talk about this at
the next NLUG meeting.
Talking about github. If the website is static, you can host it as like nlug.github.io for $0
+1 to free solutions.However, as Amber said, if we are going to have expenses (which it appears we already have wrt meetup and there could be more) I would see it as appropriate to spread that cost around somehow. That does get potentially complicated (is there a bank account? would one have to be setup? I gather we have a treasurer position but no idea what the funds situation looks like) but the extra work seems to be worth it to keep everything transparent.
On Sunday, March 1, 2015, andrew mcelroy <soph...@gmail.com> wrote:
I wouldn't be opposed to this option either.
I already proposed a different option. We should talk about this at
the next NLUG meeting.
No, you haven't. NashJS uses the exact Github solution
My only real issue with Andrew's suggestion is hosted infra managed by a single person is probably not the greatest idea (in terms of webapp availability and human availability). If you wanted to push the code to a free heroku dyno (belonging to an nlug org), I think that'd probably be a happy medium.I'm obviously still in favor of gh-pages, but that's only because I think we'd see more contributions from nlug members (Jekyll being a much lower learning curve, in my biased opinion). GitHub Pages or not, though, there's nothing preventing us from creating an nlug org for member projects.-Igneous
--
Also, April 1st is April's fool day, maybe it's just a joke? :)Actually, to speak against gh-pages: when I threw it in, I mentioned "if the website is static". And I guess that wikispot is a some wiki derivative, thus there is some DB backend behind it which holds the content, so technically it's not static. Although we might changed it rarely, but extracting the content of the wiki and flattening it into static pages would cut the possibility of a wiki type update. If we are looking for contributions on a GitHub version, a wiki version requires less expertise and can be safer, simpler. But requires a hosting with DB bakcend.
--
Good point!The question is: can this wiki exposed to the gh-pages published website, or can it be only on the direct GitHub site?
There's a reason behind my original idea-- it better uses the
meetup.com I don't have time to get in to this at the moment.