Not quite. The Supreme Court *punted* on the question of whether APIs
can be copyrighted, but instead narrowly said that reimplementing the
API is fair use. This may or may not be significant. I suspect that
in some future case, where a defendant tries to limit their damages
for copying an entire copyrighted work (by suggesting that they
shouldn't be penalized for copying the APIs), the Court will find that
they are copyrightable and penalize that defendant accordingly.
> The Supreme Court has ruled that API's can't be copyrighted, which I believe is correct. It was a 4-3 decision, so it came pretty close to going the other way, which I concur with those saying it would have set off a huge wave of terrible lawsuits.
>
> Paul Boniol
>
--
Tilghman