Issue 26 in nlp2rdf: respec.js

[nlp...@googlecode.com]

Status: Accepted
Owner: marcus.n...@gmail.com
CC: kur...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Task Priority-Medium

New issue 26 by kur...@gmail.com: respec.js
http://code.google.com/p/nlp2rdf/issues/detail?id=26

I did the following:
* on server moved logo.png, respec.js, Vector.js to
/var/www/nlp2rdf_hg/www/wiki.nlp2rdf.org which is part of this mercurial
repository
* made ln -s links from wiki.nlp2rdf.org/skins/common/logo.png -> nlp2rdf_hg
* I changed skins/Vector.php
https://code.google.com/p/nlp2rdf/source/browse/www/wiki.nlp2rdf.org/Vector.php#48
to just have NIF 1.0 reformatted
* I tried to include a local respec.js, but it wouldn't work. I don't know
why?

Could you send an email to repec.js showing them
http://wiki.nlp2rdf.org/wiki/NIF_1.0 ?
I think, they will really like the idea and maybe adopt it (W3C uses
MediaWiki also).


Here are some questions:
* Do they have the code in git or hg repo, so we could clone?
* Are we allowed to reuse the Code and Layout or is it frowned upon?
* How can we remove any W3C mentions?

[nlp...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Started

Comment #1 on issue 26 by marcus.n...@gmail.com: respec.js
http://code.google.com/p/nlp2rdf/issues/detail?id=26

> * I tried to include a local respec.js, but it wouldn't work. I don't
> know why?

I'm currently stumped, too.

> * Do they have the code in git or hg repo, so we could clone?

Couldn't find anything yet, but when I write the mail to the author(s) I
will ask.

> * Are we allowed to reuse the Code and Layout or is it frowned upon?

The license is
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
Therefore modifications are no problem.

> * How can we remove any W3C mentions?

Assumed we can serve a local respec.js we can freely modify the hardcoded
phrases.

[nlp...@googlecode.com]

Comment #2 on issue 26 by kur...@gmail.com: respec.js
http://code.google.com/p/nlp2rdf/issues/detail?id=26

>> * Are we allowed to reuse the Code and Layout or is it frowned upon?
> The license is
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
> Therefore modifications are no problem.

Even if we republish under CC-BY?

>> * How can we remove any W3C mentions?
> Assumed we can serve a local respec.js we can freely modify the hardcoded
> phrases.

It might be faster, if they point to the code?