Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Big VPN

4 views
Skip to first unread message

I.R. van Dongen

unread,
Mar 2, 2004, 6:18:32 PM3/2/04
to
Richard Atterer wrote:

>On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:00:58PM +0100, I.R. van Dongen wrote:
>
>
>>You might want to check tinc (http://tinc.nl.linux.org)
>>
>>
>
>I strongly recommend *not* to use tinc.
><http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/249142> illustrates that the
>authors didn't have enough expertise to build a secure tool 2 years ago.
>The problems were still present last autumn, see
><http://www.mit.edu:8008/bloom-picayune/crypto/14238>. What a track record!
>
>With VPN software, IPSec is the only real option if you want to be certain
>it is secure.
>
>
Nice, the first article is based on a alpha version (pre-beta) of tinc,
you didn't include the official answer.

This sounds alot like FUD, are you the author of a compeditive product?

Gr,

Ivo

PS. cc: to tinc mailinglist


Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Tinc site: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/


0 new messages