Question on year '1005' from BAG extract

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Shilpa Narayan

unread,
Feb 20, 2020, 12:46:11 PM2/20/20
to nlextract
Hello,

About 24000 items in the BAG extract have building year as '1005'. Is this a typo or is this a code for some year? Can someone clarify please?

Edward Mac Gillavry

unread,
Feb 20, 2020, 1:16:33 PM2/20/20
to nlex...@googlegroups.com
That's simply because the actual building year has not been established (yet). You may find it's the same as the postal code...

Kind regards,

Edward 

Op do 20 feb. 2020 18:46 schreef Shilpa Narayan <shilpa....@gmail.com>:
Hello,

About 24000 items in the BAG extract have building year as '1005'. Is this a typo or is this a code for some year? Can someone clarify please?

--
--
Dit is een bericht van de Google Groups "nlextract" group.
Home pagina: http://www.nlextract.nl
Groep mailen: nlex...@googlegroups.com
Afmelden: nlextract+...@googlegroups.com
Meer opties: http://groups.google.com/group/nlextract?hl=en

---
Je hebt dit bericht ontvangen omdat je bent geabonneerd op de groep 'nlextract' van Google Groepen.
Als je je wilt afmelden bij deze groep en geen e-mails van de groep meer wilt ontvangen, stuur je een e-mail naar nlextract+...@googlegroups.com.
Ga naar https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nlextract/8bcc2338-79ae-4ce5-a1d0-55d745a22259%40googlegroups.com om deze discussie op internet te bekijken.

Hans van der Meij

unread,
Feb 21, 2020, 8:34:42 AM2/21/20
to nlextract
Well, it's not simply that, it's also Amsterdam making their own interpretation of the (legal) obligations of the BAG and using a symbolic year.
But that's the case since the beginning of the BAG in 2010 (or earlier) and appearently the prerogative of a municipality as Amsterdam...

And the 24.000 is probably including a lot of old data (history). If you filter on the actual versions of the buildings (Pand) the count is only 8913 ....

There are also 7 buildings with a building year from 5 to 207. I expect these also to be incorrect...

Rgdz, Hans van der Meij

Op donderdag 20 februari 2020 19:16:33 UTC+1 schreef emacgillavry:
That's simply because the actual building year has not been established (yet). You may find it's the same as the postal code...

Kind regards,

Edward 

Op do 20 feb. 2020 18:46 schreef Shilpa Narayan <shilpa...@gmail.com>:
Hello,

About 24000 items in the BAG extract have building year as '1005'. Is this a typo or is this a code for some year? Can someone clarify please?

--
--
Dit is een bericht van de Google Groups "nlextract" group.
Home pagina: http://www.nlextract.nl
Groep mailen: nlex...@googlegroups.com

Meer opties: http://groups.google.com/group/nlextract?hl=en

---
Je hebt dit bericht ontvangen omdat je bent geabonneerd op de groep 'nlextract' van Google Groepen.
Als je je wilt afmelden bij deze groep en geen e-mails van de groep meer wilt ontvangen, stuur je een e-mail naar nlex...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages