OKAY, I HAD IT WITH ALL OF YOU! "SCIENTOLOGISTS" WHO ARE NOT ETHICAL ARE LOSERS AND NO OTs. I OFFICIALLY DECLARE ANYBODY ON AND BEYOND THE PLANET TO BE A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON, EXCEPT L. RON HUBBARD AND THE ORIGINAL MARK OR MARTY RATHBUN.
Barbara loves Marty
I am not talking about Mr. Texas and his actions but that they used
the name of Mark or Marty Rathbun. Mr. Texas is not Marty Rathbun. Ask
David Miscavige or Mike Rinder and lots of others.
Also Heber Jentzsch knows that Mr. Texas is not the original Marty
because he worked with the original Marty.
I do not want to be in any of your shoes in the orgs when the
motivator hits for those outrageous unscientological activities.
If you want to declare Mr. Texas, then declare him under his real
name, which might be
Joe Hall or Greg Lynch or Plummer Gonnet or whatever....
It would be the same thing as if you would take my name and declare me
SP for what Barbara Graham did or Mary McConnell did....
Go to hell, all of you, I declare herewith the entire planet to be
suppressive and if you all go down in all eternity, you deserve it.
Don't count on Ron pulling you out again. He did it, you gigantic
idiots destroyed it.
Barbara Schwarz
eddieVroom
Reading that title, it seems you neglected to add yourself to the list
of people not so declared.
--
.sig
Barbara loves Marty
Shut up!
Barbara loves Marty
Do not more expect friendliness from me. These times are over.
I am the one who does the declaring. There is no need to declare
myself not declared because that is self-explanatory.
Barbara Schwarz
just john
> I am not talking about Mr. Texas and his actions but that they used
> the name of Mark or Marty Rathbun. Mr. Texas is not Marty Rathbun. Ask
> David Miscavige or Mike Rinder and lots of others.
> Also Heber Jentzsch knows that Mr. Texas is not the original Marty
> because he worked with the original Marty.
>
Okay, I'll spray them, pronto.
Seriously, tho, why are you posting this to alt.slack?
Doing that just shows that you want attention, not that you really have
a valid complaint.
Well, you can actually get attention WITHOUT being all confrontational.
Honest.
I have never heard you talk about stuff you LIKE. Why not?
--
* Radio Free Entropy: http://just-john.com/cn/rfe.shtml
SusietheFloozie
<barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not talking about Mr. Texas and his actions but that they used
> the name of Mark or Marty Rathbun. Mr. Texas is not Marty Rathbun. Ask
> David Miscavige or Mike Rinder and lots of others.
> Also Heber Jentzsch knows that Mr. Texas is not the original Marty
> because he worked with the original Marty.
ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
And by the way, you're totally delusional.
Barbara loves Marty
> Barbara
BECAUSE I AM DAMN ANGRY AND THE ENTIRE WORLD SHOULD KNOW.
You may add anything to this thread, I don't care. As more you reply
as more it shows up in the search engine. I explained this before,
didn't I?
Go to bed, it's late!
Barbara Schwarz
Toilet Pepper
> ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> And by the way, you're totally delusional.
Delusional is putting it mildly.
Toilet Pepper
<barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 10, 1:14 am, just john <teuy13...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Barbara
>
> BECAUSE I AM DAMN ANGRY AND THE ENTIRE WORLD SHOULD KNOW.
>
The entire world consists of more than 30 people. If I may add the
world is round.
SusietheFloozie
Oh, right, alert the fucking wire services. What an arrogant bitch to
bother everyone in the middle of the night just because she's pitching
a snit! Only Babs is more Leona Helmsley than Joan Crawford.
What a hardass leathery harpy.
Peter Schilte
It is autumn, leaves are falling, days getting shorter: It is the high
season for people with a mental condition.
Be prepared for a lot more from Mrs. de Rotschild. ;-)
Peter
"The alleviation of the condition of insanity has also been
accomplished now!"
- L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin, November
1970, "Psychosis"
T'Peppr , Datu of Norwegia
>
> What a hardass leathery harpy.
I really like harpies. For me they are majestic creatures. It is a
shame for these creatures to be compared to a thing like Barby.
SusietheFloozie
Really. The Gorgons should sue, too.
T'Peppr , Datu of Norwegia
The Gorgons have snakes on their head and we all know they play a
major role on the lizard domination conspiracy. This conspiracy is
headed by a person named Marthie Rathbrun (not to be confused with
other people with the same name). This organization holds massive
control on public sewage and waterworks and had been injecting our
water supplies since the day they built it.
I know these things!! Don't argue with me!!
Rev. Susie the Floozie
<josefarc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
A political sewage scandal. That figures.
T'Peppr , Datu of Norwegia
Thank you for not arguing with me, believer. It was my pleasure to
share this information to everyone here.
Eldon
Yes, I long ago told her the all caps, long paragraph stuff was
childish and impolite. She was doing quite well in that regard for
some, but it looks as if she had a relapse. She's always pretty much
delusional if not hallucinatory, but that's no excuse to throw
tantrums and be disruptive. Many mentally ill people are reasonably
polite and considerate.
Rev. Richard Skull
Are you implying that Edna Flan is NOT ETHICAL?
RastaBillyBob
Have you ever met our 'friend' Archie McDeacon O'Malley, king of
random hatred? You'd like him. Or perhaps, it's more accurate to say,
that you ARE like him. The 'everyone sucks except you' attitude should
pull the two of you together like BarbnMarty Dolls.
Rev. Susie the Floozie
*Tired sigh*
Rev. Back It On Up 13
>
> - Show quoted text -
You'd better fucking not be.
Gregory Hall
news:c26f7d8a-a61e-4ea5...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> *Tired sigh*
Shut your mouth, serpent! Satan's spawn, begone!
--
Gregory Hall
Rev. Susie the Floozie
> "Rev. Susie the Floozie" <revsusiethefloo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > *Tired sigh*
>
> Shut your mouth, serpent! Satan's spawn, begone!
I didn't have to open my mouth to sigh, asshole. Go get some viagra
and leave us alone.
Gregory Hall
Obese people like you often sigh. It's because you have a hard time getting
your breath.
--
Gregory Hall
Rev. Susie the Floozie
> >> "Rev. Susie the Floozie" <revsusiethefloo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > *Tired sigh*
> Obese people like you often sigh. It's because you have a hard time getting
> your breath.
Ha? This is what you call obese? My fat tits have obviously got you
dazzled.
Just don't get one of those bodice-ripping unrequited-love fixations
on me. You're unspeakably boring. Stick to your own sad demographic--
Babs and her peeling RV home with the flat tires are just your speed.
just john
> On Oct 10, 1:14 am, just john <teuy13...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>> Barbara
>
> BECAUSE I AM DAMN ANGRY AND THE ENTIRE WORLD SHOULD KNOW.
>
So, to you "the entire world" consists of a few Scientology-related
newsgroups plus alt.slack??
I mean, okay, we may be the secret rulers of this pathetic planet, but
we're not inclined just to relay your stuff to the masses. So you'll
have to do it yourself.
Try cross-posting to some POPULAR newsgroups, if you want the entire
world to know.
Barbara loves Marty
Go to hell, defamer Eldon. You are the last person on Earth who may
talk about sanity. You don't even know what it is.
And you are also a coward who runs instead of facing court charges.
You are such an unimpressive little louse.
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara loves Marty
No, I don't like him and I don't like YOU.
Barbara Schwarz
T'Peppr , Datu of Norwegia
<barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, I don't like him and I don't like YOU.
>
What about me?
Barbara loves Marty
> Barbara loves Marty wrote:
> > On Oct 10, 1:14 am, just john <teuy13...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >> Barbara
>
> > BECAUSE I AM DAMN ANGRY AND THE ENTIRE WORLD SHOULD KNOW.
>
> So, to you "the entire world" consists of a few Scientology-related
> newsgroups plus alt.slack??
Not really, these groups just happened to be in the memory of my
browser. :)
> I mean, okay, we may be the secret rulers of this pathetic planet, but
> we're not inclined just to relay your stuff to the masses. So you'll
> have to do it yourself.
I have deep respect of myself as I know who I am.
>
> Try cross-posting to some POPULAR newsgroups, if you want the entire
> world to know.
You might have a point. Should get rid if the cookies in my browser
who have alt.slack in.
Barbara Schwarz
Rev. Susie the Floozie
HE WAS TRYING TO DO YOU A FAVOR AND PLEAD YOUR CASE BUT YOU CAN'T EVEN
SEE THAT BECAUSE YOU ARE SUCH A DELUSIONAL LUNATIC IT'S NOT FUNNY AND
YOU LIVE IN SQUALOR AND SLING YOUR DARTS AT US WHILE YOUR SINKFUL OF
DIRTY DISHES REEKS IN THE COCKROACH-INFESTED KITCHEN OF YOUR
DILAPIDATED RV AND THE EDGES OF ALL OF YOUR CHEAP PRESSED-CHIPBOARD
"FURNISHINGS" ARE SPOTTED WITH THE BURNED GOUGES OF FORGOTTEN
CIGARETTES AND STAINED WITH SPILLED COFFEE, AND A BITTER, GREASY PALL
LIES OVER EVERYTHING.
I'M JUST SAYIN'.
NO, HELL, I'M JUST SHOUTIN'!!!!!
Barbara Schwarz
You gave me no reason to like you either!
Barbara Schwarz
T'Peppr , Datu of Norwegia
Zapanaz
<barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I
WOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP
sorry, that was just my crazy-lady alarm going off again. I'll turn
it down a little.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
He punches fog, but he punches it with all his might!
:: Currently listening to Riders on the Storm, 1971, by The Doors, from "L.A. Woman"
Zapanaz
<barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>No, I don't like him and I don't like YOU.
did you notice that the only people who paid you any attention were
from the Church of the SubGenius?
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"Out of the mouths of morons comes the truth."
OF COURSE I have a major development deficit
or I wouldn't be studying the problem.
The same can be said of Jesus of Nazereth... who do
you think he was for chrissakes!.. everybody else
in the world knows that was his problem... what the
fcuk took you so long to figure it out?
Maybe the next thing you'll figure out is
who the Jews are... and then you'll be right up
to speed with the rest of the Christian world...
numbfcuk....!
- George Hammond, visionary
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
Eldon
> On 10 okt, 09:06, SusietheFloozie <susieflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 10, 1:29 am, Barbara loves Marty
>
> > <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am not talking about Mr. Texas and his actions but that they used
> > > the name of Mark or Marty Rathbun. Mr. Texas is not Marty Rathbun. Ask
> > > David Miscavige or Mike Rinder and lots of others.
> > > Also Heber Jentzsch knows that Mr. Texas is not the original Marty
> > > because he worked with the original Marty.
>
> > ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> > ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> > ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> > ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> > ENOUGH WITH THE LONG-ASS HEADERS!!!
> > And by the way, you're totally delusional.
>
> It is autumn, leaves are falling, days getting shorter: It is the high
> season for people with a mental condition.
> Be prepared for a lot more from Mrs. de Rotschild. ;-)
Well, there's also allergy season in the late springtime. That sets
some of them off.
XODDI
"Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?foo=@mindspring.com> wrote in
message news:k6l1d5hvsbvjmhh3b...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Barbara loves Marty
> <barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I
>
> WOOP WOOP WOOP WOOP
>
>
> sorry, that was just my crazy-lady alarm going off again. I'll turn
> it down a little.
>
PENIS
XODDI
Viagra only works if you have a PENIS.
Maybe Babblera Schwarz should try some, give Greggy a fudge punch.
Zapanaz
Oooh you sound just like Max von Sydow when you do that.
Now I have a boner.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
Twatwaffle goddamned Dick Nixon viola ARMADILLO fucknuts!
- Hellpope Huey
:: Currently listening to Under Pressure, 1982, by David Bowie/Queen, from "Hot Space"
Gregory Hall
===================================================
[REPLY]
Fat, disgusting and fake is how to describe those obscene protrusions of
yours, woman.
Don't worry, I am not one of these infantile me who get all hot and bothered
about oversized silicone implants. I happen to like the looks of breasts
that fit into an A or B cup. And I like to see some ribs showing below the
breast not multiple rolls of fat like you undoubtedly have which makes you
look like the Michelin Man.
--
Gregory Hall
Zapanaz
<barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>OKAY, I HAD IT WITH ALL OF YOU!
OR
You didn't have it with ME! You mean you had it with everybody on 5
newsgroups and didn't invite me?
I'm kinda hurt.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
>I'm bored and have nothing good to read.
>
>Any suggestions?
The Bible and an Alka-Seltzer suppository.
:: Currently listening to Ecclusiastics, 1961, by Charles Mingus, from "Oh Yeah"
Out_Of_The_Dark
<barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not talking about Mr. Texas and his actions but that they used
> the name of Mark or Marty Rathbun. Mr. Texas is not Marty Rathbun. Ask
> David Miscavige or Mike Rinder and lots of others.
> Also Heber Jentzsch knows that Mr. Texas is not the original Marty
> because he worked with the original Marty.
>
> motivator hits for those outrageous unscientological activities.
>
> If you want to declare Mr. Texas, then declare him under his real
> name, which might be
> Joe Hall or Greg Lynch or Plummer Gonnet or whatever....
>
> It would be the same thing as if you would take my name and declare me
> SP for what Barbara Graham did or Mary McConnell did....
>
> Go to hell, all of you, I declare herewith the entire planet to be
> suppressive and if you all go down in all eternity, you deserve it.
>
> Don't count on Ron pulling you out again. He did it, you gigantic
> idiots destroyed it.
>
> Barbara Schwarz
Barbara, that was uncalled for. I am one of the few people who shows
some modicum of respect for your right to free speech, whoi does not
go out of my way to argue with you or antagonize you. To put me in the
same category as Barbara Graham is like ....well..... equating
Hartley Patterson with Skipper!
ps: what's with the "herewith"? Makes me think it's not you posting.
Andrew Robertson
"Out_Of_The_Dark" <formerl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:101e4a4d-6587-4424...@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
<snip>
> ps: what's with the "herewith"? Makes me think it's not you posting.
Goodness me, Mary. Barbara's been heavily involved with legal documents
written in English since the early 1980's both as a senior official in the
Church of Scientology and later in a private capacity.
Though 'herewith' may not be an adverb commonly used in everyday speech or
writing, it has a precise meaning in a legal sense and is a word she would
be very familiar with and thus use when she felt it was the appropriate
word.
Leave the conspiracy theories to Roger. He's this newsgroup's leading
authority on Barbara being abducted by aliens and replaced by a changeling
from the Fifth Invader Fleet.
Regards
Andrew
Radix Lecti Artemia Salina
> BECAUSE I AM DAMN ANGRY AND THE ENTIRE WORLD SHOULD KNOW.
Why?
--
Ultra-Potent Hyper-Honcho.
Tigger
On Oct 10, 6:14 pm, "Andrew Robertson" <a...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> "Out_Of_The_Dark" <formerlyfoo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Well I kind of agree that the B.S. who came back is not exactly the
same B.S. who left on August 15. Then she was ripping me up one side
and down the other. Now nary a
word to or about me that I've seen. Not that I'm complaining....Lord
NO! But it does seem a little odd to say the least.
Tigger
Giles
wrote:
I thought she was mad as hell and wasn't going to take it anymore?
Barbara Schwarz
> On Oct 10, 1:29 am, Barbara loves Marty
>
>
>
>
>
> <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am not talking about Mr. Texas and his actions but that they used
> > the name of Mark or Marty Rathbun. Mr. Texas is not Marty Rathbun. Ask
> > David Miscavige or Mike Rinder and lots of others.
> > Also Heber Jentzsch knows that Mr. Texas is not the original Marty
> > because he worked with the original Marty.
>
> > I do not want to be in any of your shoes in the orgs when the
> > motivator hits for those outrageous unscientological activities.
>
> > If you want to declare Mr. Texas, then declare him under his real
> > name, which might be
> > Joe Hall or Greg Lynch or Plummer Gonnet or whatever....
>
> > It would be the same thing as if you would take my name and declare me
> > SP for what Barbara Graham did or Mary McConnell did....
>
> > Go to hell, all of you, I declare herewith the entire planet to be
> > suppressive and if you all go down in all eternity, you deserve it.
>
> > Don't count on Ron pulling you out again. He did it, you gigantic
> > idiots destroyed it.
>
> > Barbara Schwarz
>
> Barbara, that was uncalled for.
Many posters complain about that, Mary. Welcome to the club.
>I am one of the few people who shows
> some modicum of respect for your right to free speech, whoi does not
> go out of my way to argue with you or antagonize you.
>To put me in the
> same category as Barbara Graham is like ....well..... equating
> Hartley Patterson with Skipper!
I did not say that you are in the same category as Barb Graham. I
didn't even knew that you don't like
her. Although Hartley Patterson and Skipper have very different
opinions, they are very much alike, in fact,
I suspect them twins seperated by birth. ;)
>
> ps: what's with the "herewith"? Makes me think it's not you posting.-
Herewith is one of my favorite words. I use it at least 20 times a
day. Don't you like it?
It is me who is posting. I just decided to ignore Shirely's postings.
She seems all the time high on
medication.
You should not try to misunderstand my postings. The real Marty has
not done anything but RFW has
put his name on the extremist pages. Being on the RFW is almost or as
good as being declared.
It is the inofficial declare. If the real Marty is almost declared for
what he never did, why should you be
spared after you wrongfully posted that I do not look like L. Ron
Hubbard or the other unfriendly stuff that
you scribble about my Dad?
Anyway, Mary, I post HEREWITH that you can relax as I am not in the
business of issuing declares or are
the person who writes RFW pages.
Barbara Schwarz
--
Insanity is defined as the overt or covert but always complex and
continuous determination to harm or destroy."
L. Ron Hubbard
Pisces
wrote:
If all this crap is so bad, why not walk away?
I walked away from that "jesus" fan club ages ago because it was full
of crap. Despite the fact I felt Jesus was a nice guy, his friends
were just too big of assholes.
So seriously gal, walk away from it all. I don't run into the local
Baptist church screaming the preacher is a hypocrite.
Barbara Schwarz
>
> news:101e4a4d-6587-4424...@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
>
> <snip>
>
> > ps: what's with the "herewith"? Makes me think it's not you posting.
>
> Goodness me, Mary. Barbara's been heavily involved with legal documents
> written in English since the early 1980's both as a senior official in the
> Church of Scientology and later in a private capacity.
>
> Though 'herewith' may not be an adverb commonly used in everyday speech or
> writing, it has a precise meaning in a legal sense and is a word she would
> be very familiar with and thus use when she felt it was the appropriate
> word.
That's true, Andrew, and the said Mary hasn't heard yet my other
favorite words as to wit, albeit,
and my favorite: to witness whereof, which means that said Mary
doesn't even understand my
unique casual style in which I will soon publish children's books in
the style of Pipi Langstrumpf,
you know, the little red head who could lift a horse and her rich Dad
was king of an island in the
South Pacific. Legal speak, that is what kids are crazy about. Forget
about: Animagi, Oppugno,
and even Crusio! What kids (incl. any litte or big Mary) really want
to read about is: Herewith, at-fault third parties,
foreseeable consequences, carry out actions on their behalf and
facilitate the settlements.
Any parent, uncle, grandparent will love these books of mine as they
will put the little curtain climbers
to sleep within a minute.
>
> Leave the conspiracy theories to Roger. He's this newsgroup's leading
> authority on Barbara being abducted by aliens and replaced by a changeling
> from the Fifth Invader Fleet.
>
Roger Gonnet sure posts constantly some kind of obituaries for me. By
now, and according to his postings alone this year, I died constantly
but he never posted on what. And this is what interests an alleged
dead person most of all: on what she died. I find it very
disappointing that Roger can't even fabricate on what I allegedly
died.
Anyway, it wasn't Mary who made me angry yesterday.
I should not have checked ARS after midnight. My head was already
asleep and my fingers typed faster than the researcher in me.
So it came that Greg Hall trapped me for a brief while in his
Christian net of forgeries and I beat up on verbally
on those in the orgs who have not yet issued a said name in a said
declare although, the extremist pages
on said name are basically a declare too so I am not too far off base.
Barbara Schwarz
> Regards
>
> Andrew
JR
Barbara Schwarz
wrote:How dare you to lie again about me, Claire. I posted with no word ever
that Greg should go after women here.
You know very well that I never told him what to post. You, Shirley,
and Kat attacked him, he attacked back.
It had nothing to do with me.
All three of you started to defame and attack me first. I would have
been friendly to each of you if you
would not have thrown the first stones.
I did not defend any of you because all three of you defamed and
harassed me and Shirley (apparently on
medication) tried to rally people to deny my Internet access. Why on
Earth should I throw me before people
like that?
Sometimes one knows right away what to expect from a poster and
sometimes it takes a while till one learns
more about a poster. I was friendlier to Greg when he started to post
because I didn't knew what he was
capable of. After I learned more of his attitude, I clearly distanced
myself from his postings.
When Greg came over to ARS (I did not ask him to come here but he has
the right to post
where he wants just as you do), I did not knew that he posted doctored
pictures, sexually harassed and
posted forgeries. But what are you so fired up about, Claire? After
all, it was you who posted forgery
and sexually harassing stuff too. So, the both of you are on the same
level here.I am not, as I never have
done anything like that.
If he sexually harasses and forges, you protest against it but when
you do it, is okay or what?
It is hypocritical. But it is also hypocritical of Greg to rub it in
your face when he does the same.
You are adults and you have to defend yourselves. But there is no way
ever that I posted or encouraged
Greg Hall to post anything that would not be true or that would be
sexist or that would be sexually
harassing against anybody. I also did not read all postings that he or
Kat, Shirley or you made.
Most of the time I am ignoring these, I don't read them as it is time
consuming and contains defamation and
abuse. I don't want to spent all day on Usenet. So, I read mainly the
postings about Marty Rathbun,
other subjects that interest me (not to many of these are posted) or
the postings in which somebody
addresses me personally or which otherwise come on my plate.
Whatever Greg Hall posted about you women was never my business, and I
never posted or emailed or
encourage Greg Hall to post sexist remarks about any woman in the
entire world, and that includes
liars and defamers as you, Shirely and Kat.
It is time that you blame yourself. I blame myself when things go
wrong.
I just wrote to Peach that it was my fault as I didn't check the
details of that "SP declare".
I usually do check details before I act. My blood was raging but this
is no excuse. I messed up
in this regard and thought for a little while that this declare was
real after the RFW pages were up
and they are indeed authentic.
I feel foolish that I did, but if I am able to admit that I made a
mistake and should have done the
appropriate research, why can't you admit to what you did false
instead of blaming me again and again and
again?
Barbara Schwarz
> L. Ron Hubbard- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
XODDI
You said Greg is an anal cum slut and a pillow biter.
Giles
> You lie.
>
> You said Greg is an anal cum slut and a pillow biter.
I thought you had some "E" for Claire. (and chocolate)
Eldon
Anything to avoid a long paragraph in ALL CAPS as a subject header.
It's too bad Barbara can't behave like a lady and has to shout while
setting her hair on fire.
Voltaire's Child
"Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSc...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:999664cf-0c3d-43ac...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 10, 8:17 pm, Barbara Schwarz <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 10, 4:46 pm, Out_Of_The_Dark <formerlyfoo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>How dare you to lie again about me, Claire. I posted with no word >ever
>that Greg should go after women here.
>You know very well that I never told him what to post. You, Shirley,
>and Kat attacked him, he attacked back.
I didn't say you told him what to post. I said you encouraged him. Which you
did.
I did not "attack him". I did jump in when he started attacking other
people.
Suck it.
Claire
Gregory Hall
news:fbb345c0-3c0d-4c8d...@p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>
> If all this crap is so bad, why not walk away?
> I walked away from that "jesus" fan club ages ago because it was full
> of crap. Despite the fact I felt Jesus was a nice guy, his friends
> were just too big of assholes.
You dare judge Jesus?
That's called the sin of pride. God hates proud and haughty people. The sin
of pride is a grave sin because it rejects God.
--
Gregory Hall
Pisces
> "Pisces" <kvanh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Um. God isn't real. Its some imaginary sky man you seem to think is
important.
He has had lots of chances to prove he is real yet he doesn't.
Worshiping a fake man in the sky is about as logical as worshiping a
character from Star Trek.
(Hell, William Shatner might dig that when I think of it)
Jesus was a mortal guy just like L Ron Hubbard.
Jesus and L Ron both have shitty fan clubs who kill people.
Zapanaz
I always love watching people speak on behalf of God about how God
hates proud and haughty people.
You speak on God's behalf a lot, don't you, Mr. Humility?
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
"again, the violet bows to the lily.
again, the rose is tearing off her gown!"--rumi
:: Currently listening to Anarchy in the U.K., 1977, by Sex Pistols, from "Never Mind the Bollocks Here's the Sex Pistols"
just john
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:19:03 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
> <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>
>> "Pisces" <kvan...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fbb345c0-3c0d-4c8d...@p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>> If all this crap is so bad, why not walk away?
>>> I walked away from that "jesus" fan club ages ago because it was full
>>> of crap. Despite the fact I felt Jesus was a nice guy, his friends
>>> were just too big of assholes.
>>
>> You dare judge Jesus?
>>
>> That's called the sin of pride. God hates proud and haughty people. The sin
>> of pride is a grave sin because it rejects God.
>
> I always love watching people speak on behalf of God about how God
> hates proud and haughty people.
>
> You speak on God's behalf a lot, don't you, Mr. Humility?
>
You, on the other hand, are far too MODEST AND REASONABLE to properly
represent God's intentions!
God's an arrogant bugger, and needs arrogant buggers (and even arrogant
buggerers) to spread his Word the way it should be spread!
--
* Radio Free Entropy: http://just-john.com/cn/rfe.shtml
Gregory Hall
news:999664cf-0c3d-43ac...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
> that Greg should go after women here.
But, you did seem to approve of it as long as I did not say anything frank
about you.
> You know very well that I never told him what to post. You, Shirley,
> and Kat attacked him, he attacked back.
> It had nothing to do with me.
What about those famous sig lines of yours. They encouraged me to be on your
side in attacking them - not that they don't deserve it.
> All three of you started to defame and attack me first.
> I would have been friendly to each of you if you would not
> have thrown the first stones.
But, you must think everybody can read your mind. You must think that
everybody will never screw up and say or do something you happen to
disapprove of? All it takes with you is one little screw up and you turn and
attack. That is very intolerant of you, Barbara. Like in my case, I posted
an obvious Photoshop job meant to poke fun at some people who also
Photoshopped your photo to make you appear ugly. I did it, not to offend
you, but to expose their hypocrisy. One, simple, little, well-meaning post
and you turned on me like a snarling bitch protecting her litter. If you did
this to me who often expressed devotion to you, I can easily imagine you did
it to Claire and Shirley, too. And, to all the others you feud with as well.
Ya think?
> I did not defend any of you because all three of you defamed and
> harassed me and Shirley (apparently on medication) tried to rally
> people to deny my Internet access. Why on Earth should I throw
> me before people like that?
She obviously over reacted when she tried to take away your Internet access.
That was the act of a Fascist censor and a small mind. I agree with you when
you say one person has just as much right to speak their mind as another.
Trying to silence anybody by taking away their means to express themselves
is actually a criminal offense in my opinion.
> Sometimes one knows right away what to expect from a poster and
> sometimes it takes a while till one learns
> more about a poster. I was friendlier to Greg when he started to post
> because I didn't knew what he was
> capable of. After I learned more of his attitude, I clearly distanced
> myself from his postings.
Thanks for being friendly at first. It shows you don't have a completely
closed mind at least. But, have you ever heard the old saying, "opposites
attract?"
> When Greg came over to ARS (I did not ask him to come here
> but he has the right to post where he wants just as you do), I
> did not knew that he posted doctored pictures, sexually harassed
> and posted forgeries.
Your rules are not everybody's rules, Barbara. Doctored pictures are all
over the place on the web. It is not considered aberrant behavior at all,
not in the least. It is a simple fact of Internet life. Get a clue, woman!
And, you say on the one hand that I have the right to post what I want but,
on the other hand, you say I have no right to post doctored pictures. You
can't have it both ways, ya know.
As for sexual harassment, only a total prude would consider a bikini-clad
woman sexual harassment. As for forgeries again get a clue. Forgeries are
all over the place on the Internet and Usenet. And is it really a forgery
when the author admits it's a forgery? If I passed off a two dollar bill
buying some nectarines and the two dollar bill had a picture of Bill Clinton
on it and the clerk looked at it and said, "This is an obvious forgery," and
I said, Oops, that is just a joke note bashing Clinton. Then it's a joke and
not a forgery. Only if I insisted in trying to pass it off as real is it a
real forgery. Get it?
> But what are you so fired up about, Claire? After
> all, it was you who posted forgery and sexually harassing
> stuff too. So, the both of you are on the same level here.
> I am not, as I never have done anything like that.
Many people would consider your claims about being married to Marty Rathbun
a forgery of sorts. After all, no proof has ever been shown. No documents to
validify it are available. If a declare posted to ARS can be considered a
forgery, can not also a statement or statements about being married to a man
when no proof is available be a forgery?
> If he sexually harasses and forges, you protest against it but when
> you do it, is okay or what? It is hypocritical. But it is also
> hypocritical
> of Greg to rub it in your face when he does the same.
Sexual harassment, when it exists only in your mind only, is hardly sexual
harassment. Any court of law would look at that Photoshopped photo you were
so horrified about and say it was hardly sexual harassment.
It is not being hypocritical when I tease Claire about her vibrator forgery.
She signed L. Ron Hubbard's name to it. Look closely at my 'forgery.' Do you
see anybody's name other than Marty Rathbun's? Now, if I would have signed
David Miscavige's name to the bottom then it would have been on par with
Claire's forgery.
> You are adults and you have to defend yourselves. But there is no way
> ever that I posted or encouraged Greg Hall to post anything that would
> not be true or that would be sexist or that would be sexually
> harassing against anybody. I also did not read all postings that he or
> Kat, Shirley or you made.
>
> Most of the time I am ignoring these, I don't read them as it is time
> consuming and contains defamation and abuse. I don't want to spent
> all day on Usenet. So, I read mainly the postings about Marty Rathbun,
> other subjects that interest me (not to many of these are posted) or
> the postings in which somebody addresses me personally or which
> otherwise come on my plate.
I think that is a stretch of the truth, Barbara. I don't think you've let a
single post by Claire and Shirley go by for months without responding to
them.
> Whatever Greg Hall posted about you women was never my business,
> and I never posted or emailed or encourage Greg Hall to post sexist
> remarks about any woman in the entire world, and that includes
> liars and defamers as you, Shirely and Kat.
Whatever Gregory posted about you women was never your business? <roflol>
Answer me, then, why you label me as a sexist? If it never was your business
then why defame me as sexist? Perhaps it's based upon your stance as a
feminist? The point is I can label you and you can label me but what value
to either of the labels have considering the source of them?
> It is time that you blame yourself. I blame myself when things go
> wrong.
> I just wrote to Peach that it was my fault as I didn't check the
> details of that "SP declare".
So, you were the victim of a clever ruse. Big deal. Don't blame yourself for
such a trivial shortcoming. It just goes to show that words can be powerful
and minds can be fooled and Usenet is a force to be reckoned with when used
as theater of the mind.
IMO, to use discussion groups uncreatively is to show a certain staid
attitude not worthy of Usenet's potential. Sometimes I wonder if OTs are
anything more than blowhards. How can an OT claim to have advance mind
powers when they lack even basic creativity or the urge to be creative. If
the only thing an OT values is truth, the whole truth and nothing but the
truth then I say they are BTs (boring thetans). Playfulness is also the
hallmark of an evolved being.
> I usually do check details before I act. My blood was raging but this
> is no excuse. I messed up in this regard and thought for a little while
> that this declare was real after the RFW pages were up and they are
> indeed authentic.
See! I knew it. Even long distance, you and I make one hell of a team. What
other alpha male can get your blood raging like this? Made you feel alive,
didn't it, girl? Better than pondering some boring truth, huh, Barbara. Got
the adrenaline flowing. Made you want to fight. Did your face get flushed?
Didn't you feel a little more alive than usual? Wake up OT and rid
yourselves of the restrictions Scientology taught you just to keep you in
line.
> I feel foolish that I did, but if I am able to admit that I made a
> mistake and should have done the appropriate research, why can't
> you admit to what you did false instead of blaming me again and
> again and again?
Forget about that part of the tech. You have been programmed. Scientology
doesn't really want independent agents. Scientology fears an independent
agent. Half of what they teach you expands your mind but the other half
controls it to do as they tell you. Rid yourself of this control and you
just might amount to something worthy of being called L. Ron Hubbard's
progeny.
Peace and Love,
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:19:03 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
> <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>
>>"Pisces" <kvan...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:fbb345c0-3c0d-4c8d...@p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> If all this crap is so bad, why not walk away?
>>> I walked away from that "jesus" fan club ages ago because it was full
>>> of crap. Despite the fact I felt Jesus was a nice guy, his friends
>>> were just too big of assholes.
>>
>>
>>You dare judge Jesus?
>>
>>That's called the sin of pride. God hates proud and haughty people. The
>>sin
>>of pride is a grave sin because it rejects God.
>
> I always love watching people speak on behalf of God about how God
> hates proud and haughty people.
>
> You speak on God's behalf a lot, don't you, Mr. Humility?
I repeat God's words and Jesus' teachings from the Bible. That is one of the
duties of a real Christian.
--
Gregory Hall
Douche Bagelow
<barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do not more expect friendliness from me. These times are over.
>
>
>
>
> Barbara Schwarz
Zapanaz
<greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>"Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?foo=@mindspring.com> wrote in
>message news:dam6d5he4ed71r66l...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:19:03 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
>> <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>>
>>>"Pisces" <kvan...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:fbb345c0-3c0d-4c8d...@p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> If all this crap is so bad, why not walk away?
>>>> I walked away from that "jesus" fan club ages ago because it was full
>>>> of crap. Despite the fact I felt Jesus was a nice guy, his friends
>>>> were just too big of assholes.
>>>
>>>
>>>You dare judge Jesus?
>>>
>>>That's called the sin of pride. God hates proud and haughty people. The
>>>sin
>>>of pride is a grave sin because it rejects God.
>>
>> I always love watching people speak on behalf of God about how God
>> hates proud and haughty people.
>>
>> You speak on God's behalf a lot, don't you, Mr. Humility?
>
>I repeat God's words and Jesus' teachings from the Bible. That is one of the
>duties of a real Christian.
But of course, you choose which words to repeat, and in which context,
and to whom. Which just so happens to fit in with your own personal
opinions and agenda within the conversation.
But you're too arrogant and full of yourself to even see that, which
is glaringly obvious to anybody else.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
How long was I in the army? Five foot eleven.
- Spike Milligan
:: Currently listening to Troublant Bolero, 1952, by Django Reinhardt, from "Brussels 1947 & Paris 1951 - 1953"
Gregory Hall
Duh, it's called free will and in part of all of our creation.
--
Gregory Hall
Zapanaz
<greg...@home.fake> wrote:
What? What did that even have to do with what I was saying?
I was pointing out that you were, in effect, speaking on God's behalf,
which was wonderfully ironic in that you were berating somebody else
for what you (on behalf of God) saw as arrogance.
So your defence is "duh, it's called free will"? Yes, I suppose it
is, but it remains hugely and foully arrogant.
***
I always wonder why people post that kind of completely irrelevant
reply. Is it that you don't get that your reply didn't address the
issue you were replying to?
Or is it that, you think usenet is kind of like ping-pong, and as long
as you can send some kind of reply back over the net, you think you're
still in the game?
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
' [Calculus] must be some sort of a Black Magic operation, started out by the Luce cult -- some immoral people who are operating up in New York City, Rockefeller Plaza -- been thoroughly condemned by the whole society. '
- L. Ron Hubbard
:: Currently listening to Afro-Blue, 1965, by John Coltrane, from "Live in Seattle"
Gregory Hall
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:45:13 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
> <greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>
>>"Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?foo=@mindspring.com> wrote in
>>message news:b8r6d5tuudnbu3s8o...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> But of course, you choose which words to repeat, and in which context,
>>> and to whom. Which just so happens to fit in with your own personal
>>> opinions and agenda within the conversation.
>>>
>>> But you're too arrogant and full of yourself to even see that, which
>>> is glaringly obvious to anybody else.
>>
>>
>>Duh, it's called free will and in part of all of our creation.
>
> What? What did that even have to do with what I was saying?
It's got everything to do with your claim that because I repeat God's word
in context of where I stand that I am arrogant beyond belief.
One of the other tenets of Chrisitanity is the concept of free will. It is
part and parcel of how mankind operates. We can choose to sin even when we
know full well it is a sin. That is arrogance. So, tell me why my suggesting
that free will allows me to choose such words and context as I will?
> I was pointing out that you were, in effect, speaking on God's behalf,
> which was wonderfully ironic in that you were berating somebody else
> for what you (on behalf of God) saw as arrogance.
So, you are thinking that it is arrogant for God's ultimate creation
(mankind) is arrogant because the creation speaks for the creator? Examine
your logic. God teaches us he is perfect. God also teaches us we were
created in His image. Is it not arrogant of YOU to assume that it is an
insult to God when his ultimate creation elects to do God's bidding even if
the creation lacks the total perfection of the creator? The answer to that
is a resounding, yes!
>
> So your defence is "duh, it's called free will"? Yes, I suppose it
> is, but it remains hugely and foully arrogant.
My defense is, unfortunately, as effective as the limited understanding of
reality of my debate opponent.
--
Gregory Hall
Pisces
> "Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?f...@mindspring.com> wrote in
> messagenews:diu6d5taqlugq43cs...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:45:13 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
>
> >>"Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?f...@mindspring.com> wrote in
> >>messagenews:b8r6d5tuudnbu3s8o...@4ax.com...
Then, it is, by your own reasoning, my free will to recognize that
your "God" is a made up character in a rather interesting book of
fiction called the "Bible". A book which took nearly half its content
from another fictional work called the "Torah".
Barbara loves Marty
> "Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com> wrote in message
>
> news:999664cf-0c3d-43ac...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 10, 8:17 pm, Barbara Schwarz <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
> > How dare you to lie again about me, Claire. I posted with no word ever
> > that Greg should go after women here.
>
> But,
Your postings are full of lies and insults, Greg. And you do not learn
from former "mistakes". You also sexually harassed me in a posting
asking me if Claire would have mailed me her vibrator. You
conveniently "forget" your wrotten like hell postings, don't you?
Such postings do not deserve my attention and a long response.
I never approved of you provoking, insulting, attacking, defaming,
forging or sexually harassing anyone. I never was your nanny. That is
all your fantasy. I was friendly to you as I am friendly to Jonathon
or RR or Andrew Robertson or Peach or John Dorsay or anybody else who
does not provoking, insulting, attacking, defaming, forging or
sexually harassing or cyberstalking me. I might not share their
opinions but we act civilized towards each other.
If any of them would suddenly post photoshop pictures of me, would
forge me or other documents or would sexually harass me, they would
hear the same as you do.
People are responsible for their own posting. I am responsible for
mine. You are responsible for yours. If people have a problem with
your postings, I am not the address, you are. Nothing that you do was
approved by me. My signature lines never contained: I approve of Greg
Hall's postings. You are an adult and you should not blame me for your
own wrongful behavior just because some jealous women try to get back
at me.
I have not replied to Shirely for months as she does cyberstalk me and
I am also ignoring Kat for a long time.
Go back where you came from Greg. And leave me alone. You don't know
me even remotely, anything that you accuse me of is part of your
personality and boring life, not mine, and I don't want to have
anything to do with a liar and person as evil and disgusting as you
are. Shirely might be indeed your soulmate. Have a happy life
together.
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara loves Marty
wrote:
> "Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com> wrote in message
Gues that is the fine lady-like behavior that your friend Kat just
described, Claire.
>
> Claire
Anybody is responsible for his or her own conduct. What was and is
between Greg, Shirely, Kat, and you was never of interest of me not
approved by me nor encouraged by me. Most of the postings I did not
even read. You are all adults and responsible for what you do. I am
not the nanny of any of you.
Since months I am telling Greg to decently. It is not my fault if he
does not.
If you want to make me responsible for Greg's postings, then I could
do the same with you. Like, your vibrator stuff did encourage him...
I could post that your vibrator stuff that you posted first did
encouraged him to harass me with it.
How do you like that? This is exactly what you do with me.
It all blames down that you can just blame me for what *I* posted. And
I do not post stuff like Greg nor you nor Shirely nor Kat.
Barbara Schwarz
Zapanaz
<greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>So, tell me why my suggesting
>that free will allows me to choose such words and context as I will?
>
??
That doesn't even make sense. Tell you what?
>Is it not arrogant of YOU to assume that it is an
>insult to God when his ultimate creation elects to do God's bidding even if
>the creation lacks the total perfection of the creator? The answer to that
>is a resounding, yes!
uh-huh. You realize that covers basically any behavior, right?
So what you're doing is wrong, but it's right, because it's God's
will, because everything is.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
I got a new shadow. I had to get rid of the other one it wasn't doing what I was doing.
- Steven Wright
:: Currently listening to Better Git It in Your Soul, 1959, by Charles Mingus, from "Mingus Ah Um"
Unclaimed Mysteries
Actually, we *are* responsible for your postings, because we control
your mind. Thank you for your continued thoughtless obedience.
Signed,
The Church of the FlanMasons.
-cls
--
It Came From C. L. Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries.
http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net
What Does A Yellow Light Mean?
http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net/blog
Rev. Richard Skull
> "Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?f...@mindspring.com> wrote in
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:39 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
>
> >>"Zapanaz" <http://joecosby.com/code/mail.pl?f...@mindspring.com> wrote in
> >>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:19:03 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
>
> >>>>"Pisces" <kvanh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:fbb345c0-3c0d-4c8d...@p15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>>>> If all this crap is so bad, why not walk away?
> >>>>> I walked away from that "jesus" fan club ages ago because it was full
> >>>>> of crap. Despite the fact I felt Jesus was a nice guy, his friends
> >>>>> were just too big of assholes.
>
> >>>>You dare judge Jesus?
>
> >>>>That's called the sin of pride. God hates proud and haughty people. The
> >>>>sin
> >>>>of pride is a grave sin because it rejects God.
>
> >>> I always love watching people speak on behalf of God about how God
> >>> hates proud and haughty people.
>
> >>> You speak on God's behalf a lot, don't you, Mr. Humility?
>
> >>I repeat God's words and Jesus' teachings from the Bible. That is one of
> >>the
> >>duties of a real Christian.
>
> > But of course, you choose which words to repeat, and in which context,
> > and to whom. Which just so happens to fit in with your own personal
> > opinions and agenda within the conversation.
>
> > But you're too arrogant and full of yourself to even see that, which
> > is glaringly obvious to anybody else.
>
> Duh, it's called free will and in part of all of our creation.
>
> --
>
> - Show quoted text -
Is that "Free Will" what got you one the Sex Offender's List?
Gregory Hall
news:8fbe4f2a-0c5c-4c17...@g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
:: Is that "Free Will" what got you one the Sex Offender's List?
::
A better question is what made you so stupid that you can spell 'on?' <lol>
--
Gregory Hall
Zapanaz
<greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>:: Is that "Free Will" what got you one the Sex Offender's List?
>
>::
>
>A better question is what made you so stupid that you
>can
>spell 'on?' <lol>
<lol>
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
-
xxxXRRRMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMxxx,.
xXXRRRRRXXXVVXVVXXXXXXXRRRRRMMMRx,
xXRRXRVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVXXXXXRXXRRRMMMMMRx.
xXRXXXVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVXXXXVXXXXXXRRRRRMMMMMxx.
xXRRXXVVVVVttVtVVVVVVVVVtVXVVVVXXXXXRRRRRRRMMMMMXx
xXXRXXVVVVVtVttttttVtttttttttVXXXVXXXRXXRRRRRRRMMMMMMXx
XRXRXVXXVVVVttVtttVttVttttttVVVVXXXXXXXXXRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMVx
XRXXRXVXXVVVVtVtttttVtttttittVVVXXVXVXXXRXRRRRRMRRMMMMMMMMMX,
XRRRMRXRXXXVVVXVVtttittttttttttVVVVXXVXXXXXXRRRRRMRMMMMMMMMMMM,
XXXRRRRRXXXXXXVVtttttttttttttttttVtVXVXXXXXXXRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMMMM,
XXXXRXRXRXXVXXVtVtVVttttttttttttVtttVXXXXXXXRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMR
VVXXXVRVVXVVXVVVtttititiitttttttttttVVXXXXXXRRRRRMRMMMMMMMMMMMMMMV
VttVVVXRXVVXtVVVtttii|iiiiiiittttttttitXXXRRRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
tiRVVXRVXVVVVVit|ii||iii|||||iiiiiitiitXXXXXXXXRRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMMMM
+iVtXVttiiii|ii|+i+|||||i||||||||itiiitVXXVXXXRRRRRRRRMMMMMMRMMMX
`+itV|++|tttt|i|+||=+i|i|iiii|iiiiiiiitiVtti+++++|itttRRRRRMVXVit
+iXV+iVt+,tVit|+=i|||||iiiiitiiiiiiii|+||itttti+=++|+iVXVRV:,|t
+iXtiXRXXi+Vt|i||+|++itititttttttti|iiiiitVt:.:+++|+++iXRMMXXMR
:iRtiXtiV||iVVt||||++ttittttttttttttttXXVXXRXRXXXtittt|iXRMMXRM
:|t|iVtXV+=+Xtti+|++itiiititittttVttXXXXXXXRRRXVtVVtttttRRMMMM|
+iiiitttt||i+++||+++|iiiiiiiiitVVVXXRXXXRRRRMXVVVVttVVVXRMMMV
:itti|iVttt|+|++|++|||iiiiiiiittVVXRRRMMMMMMRVtitittiVXRRMMMV
`i|iitVtXt+=||++++|++++|||+++iiiVVXVRXRRRV+=|tttttttiRRRMMM|
i+++|+==++++++++++++++|||||||||itVVVViitt|+,,+,,=,+|itVX'
|+++++.,||+|++++=+++++++|+|||||iitt||i||ii||||||itXt|
t||+++,.=i+|+||+++++++++++++|i|ittiiii|iiitttttXVXRX|
:||+++++.+++++++++|++|++++++|||iii||+:,:.-+:+|iViVXV
iii||+++=.,+=,=,==++++++++++|||itttt|itiittXRXXXitV'
;tttii||++,.,,,.,,,,,=++++++++++|iittti|iiiiVXXXXXXV
tVtttiii||++++=,,. . ,,,=+++++++|itiiiiiii||||itttVt
tVVttiiiii||||++++==,. ..,.,+++=++iiiiiitttttVVXXRRXXV
..ttVVttitttii||i|||||+|+=,. .,,,,==+iittVVVXRRMXRRRV
....'''ittitttttitVttttiiiiii|ii|++++=+=..... ,.,,||+itiVVXXVXV
,|iitiiitttttttiiiii||ii||||||||+++++,.i|itVt+,,=,==.........
,|itiiiVtVtiii||iiiiii|||||||++||||tt|VXXRX| .... .. ' ' '.
,,i|ii||i||+|i|i|iiiiiiii||||ittRVVXRXRMX+, . ... . ,
. .,+|++|||||ii|i|iiiitttVVttXVVXVXRRRRXt+. ..... . . ,. .
. . ,,++|||||||i|iiitVVVXXXXVXXVXXRRRV+=,..... .... .. ..
.,,++|||i|iittXXXXRMViRXXXXRVt+=, .. ...... . ..
,XX+.=+++iitVVXXXRXVtXXVRRV++=,..... .,, . .
.... +XX+|i,,||tXRRRXVXti|+++,,. .,,. . . .. . . ....
. . . .. .(C):JE:.....++,,..,...,.... .. .. ...
:: Currently listening to Karn Evil 9 (Instrumental Mix), 1973, by Emerson, Lake & Palmer, from "Brain Salad Surgery"
RastaBillyBob
> "Rev. Richard Skull" <msh...@verizon.net> wrote in messagenews:8fbe4f2a-0c5c-4c17...@g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
Waiting to see if you'll see it, Greggy... Waiting...waiting...
You misspelled <LOL> It's an anagram, so it's all caps!
That, plus you omitted the apostrophe t in can't.
Boy, are you stupid! <LOLZ!>
Gregory Hall
news:a35d70b8-609a-44af...@j4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> Waiting to see if you'll see it, Greggy... Waiting...waiting...
>
>
> You misspelled <LOL> It's an anagram, so it's all caps!
> That, plus you omitted the apostrophe t in can't.
> Boy, are you stupid! <LOLZ!>
Boy are you slacker Rubes ever easy to snare. One little rusty and bare hook
catches a passel of you morons. <roflmao>
--
Gregory Hall
Serious Toilet Pepper
>
> Boy are you slacker Rubes ever easy to snare. One little rusty and bare hook
> catches a passel of you morons. <roflmao>
>
> --
>
Tell me, Mr. Hall, what does your God look like?
Andrew Robertson
"Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralov...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:356351a5-998c-4cca...@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> I was friendly to you as I am friendly to Jonathon
> or RR or Andrew Robertson or Peach or John Dorsay or anybody else who
> does not provoking, insulting, attacking, defaming, forging or
> sexually harassing or cyberstalking me. I might not share their
> opinions but we act civilized towards each other.
I agree with you, Barbara and I'd paraphrase your sentiments as "If you
don't tread on another's toes then they won't tread on yours."
All the best
Andrew
Zapanaz
<greg...@home.fake> wrote:
>Boy are you slacker Rubes ever easy to snare. One little rusty and bare hook
>catches a passel of you morons. <roflmao>
yeah that's what they always say when they're losing. OH, but I did
that on PURPOSE!
Peewee Herman does it best.
--
Zapanaz
International Satanic Conspiracy
Customer Support Specialist
http://joecosby.com/
If somebody is worth shooting once, they're worth shooting twice
:: Currently listening to Hyper-Gamma-Spaces, 1978, by Alan Parsons Project, from "Pyramid"
Gregory Hall
news:e0b7cfe3-055b-4bc3...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
Since the Bible (God's word) states man was created in God's image I can say
with surety that God has two arms, two legs, a head with two eyes, a nose, a
mouth, two ears, etc. He has skin and hair, flesh and bones. He is male and
has male genitals. He created Eve, a woman, as a helpmate and male
counterpart. Men have XY chromosome. Females have two XX chromosomes. The
Bible says God took a 'rib' from Adam to create Eve. I think 'rib' should
have been translated as "an X chromosome" God obviously used male DNA but
only the X chromosome doubled up to create the woman. This is why God
appoints the man to be the head as the woman is but half a man in the way
God created her.
God, laughs, He cries, He thinks, He creates and He destroys. He knows
everything. He is outside of time. As for specifics like skin color, eye
color, hair color, height, weight, etc nobody knows. But, we shall all know
what He looks like when we die and stand before Him under his knowing gaze
on Judgment Day. Those who call him Father and believe He so loved the world
that He gave His only begotten son that we might have eternal life will be
blessed and granted the promised eternal life. Those who rejected God will
be put forth from God's grace and relegated to hell so they can worship
their chosen master, Satan, until Satan, hell and its entire contents is
utterly destroyed when God decides it must be no more.
--
Gregory Hall
Gregory Hall
news:hb0g2f$ncg$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Have you ever seen Barbara's feet and toes? They are huge. Pretty hard for
her NOT to step on somebody else's toes with those giant feet. <lol>
--
Gregory Hall
Barbara loves Marty
> "Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:356351a5-998c-4cca...@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I was friendly to you as I am friendly to Jonathon
> > or RR or Andrew Robertson or Peach or John Dorsay or anybody else who
> > does not provoking, insulting, attacking, defaming, forging or
> > sexually harassing or cyberstalking me. I might not share their
> > opinions but we act civilized towards each other.
>
> I agree with you, Barbara and I'd paraphrase your sentiments as "If you
> don't tread on another's toes then they won't tread on yours."
>
> All the best
>
> Andrew
Thanks, Andrew. You are a reader and poster of this board since a long
time. I remember that you were already here when I started to post and
despite that we have differences of opinion, in all these years, we
always managed to stay civilized. Nobody lashed out against anybody,
nobody forged, nobody photoshopped, nobody sexually harassed, nobody
tried to overpower the other person with insults.
Greg could learn something from you.
--
Insanity is defined as "the overt or covert but always complex and
continuous determination to harm or destroy."
L. Ron Hubbard
Voltaire's
> "Andrew Robertson" <a...@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message
>
> news:hb0g2f$ncg$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >news:356351a5-998c-4cca...@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> I was friendly to you as I am friendly to Jonathon
> >> or RR or Andrew Robertson or Peach or John Dorsay or anybody else who
> >> does not provoking, insulting, attacking, defaming, forging or
> >> sexually harassing or cyberstalking me. I might not share their
> >> opinions but we act civilized towards each other.
>
> > I agree with you, Barbara and I'd paraphrase your sentiments as "If you
> > don't tread on another's toes then they won't tread on yours."
>
> > All the best
>
> > Andrew
>
> Have you ever seen Barbara's feet and toes? They are huge. Pretty hard for
> her NOT to step on somebody else's toes with those giant feet. <lol>
>
> --
Oh stop. You know better. That's just petty. You thought B was the
acme of feminine perfection til you guys started fighting. Now, you're
complaining about her foot size.
Claire
Voltaire's
<barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 11, 8:10 pm, "Voltaire'sChild" <Voltaires_Ch...@ymail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:999664cf-0c3d-43ac...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 10, 8:17 pm, Barbara Schwarz <BarbaraSchwarz2...@excite.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 10, 4:46 pm, Out_Of_The_Dark <formerlyfoo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >that Greg should go after women here.
> > >You know very well that I never told him what to post. You, Shirley,
> > >and Kat attacked him, he attacked back.
>
> > I didn't say you told him what to post. I said you encouraged him. Which you
> > did.
>
> > I did not "attack him". I did jump in when he started attacking other
> > people.
>
> > Suck it.
>
> Gues that is the fine lady-like behavior that your friend Kat just
> described,Claire.
I know lots of people who say "suck it". Anyway, it pretty much pales
in comparison with the constant targetting of people that you do.
>
>
>
> >Claire
>
> Anybody is responsible for his or her own conduct. What was and is
> between Greg, Shirely, Kat, and you was never of interest of me not
> approved by me nor encouraged by me. Most of the postings I did not
> even read. You are all adults and responsible for what you do. I am
> not the nanny of any of you.
No, you're not, yet you seem to have elected yourself such.
>
> Since months I am telling Greg to decently. It is not my fault if he
> does not.
>
> If you want to make me responsible for Greg's postings, then I could
> do the same with you. Like, your vibrator stuff did encourage him...
> I could post that your vibrator stuff that you posted first did
> encouraged him to harass me with it.
I didn't make you responsible for Greg's postings. I said that you're
hypocritical about them.
>
> How do you like that? This is exactly what you do with me.
>
> It all blames down that you can just blame me for what *I* posted. And
> I do not post stuff like Greg nor you nor Shirely nor Kat.
>
A hypocrite's a hypocrite.
C