The opinion says:
"The State contends that only sixtytwo images have been forwarded to the
State's expert for analysis. However, defendant correctly counters that
thousands of images were viewed from websites accessed bylaw enforcement
agents as part of the discovery in this litigation." You can read the
context of this statement for yourself.
It is not clear whether the State is going to prove that Mr. Cohen viewed
"only" 62 images or thousands of images.
Anyway you look at it, it is a lot of child porn involved in this case.