Groups
Groups
Sign in
Groups
Groups
nix-dev
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
nix-dev
1–30 of 570
Mark all as read
Report group
0 selected
Daniel Santa Cruz
,
erik quanstrom
2
6/6/12
haskellPackages_ghc741_no_profiling.downloadCurl depends on old version of tagsoup
On Wed Jun 6 22:01:04 EDT 2012, dst...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm wondering if there is any
unread,
haskellPackages_ghc741_no_profiling.downloadCurl depends on old version of tagsoup
On Wed Jun 6 22:01:04 EDT 2012, dst...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm wondering if there is any
6/6/12
Noah Evans
,
MariusHi...@googlemail.com
2
5/21/12
Re: code review 6222049: libmach: Fixed build problem. (issue 6222049)
Reviewers: npe, Message: Hello noah....@gmail.com (cc: nix...@googlegroups.com), I'd like you
unread,
Re: code review 6222049: libmach: Fixed build problem. (issue 6222049)
Reviewers: npe, Message: Hello noah....@gmail.com (cc: nix...@googlegroups.com), I'd like you
5/21/12
Marius Hillenbrand
,
Noah Evans
2
5/15/12
Fixing the current nix build problem
Done :) Noah On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Marius Hillenbrand <marius.hi...@kit.edu>
unread,
Fixing the current nix build problem
Done :) Noah On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Marius Hillenbrand <marius.hi...@kit.edu>
5/15/12
noah....@gmail.com
3
5/15/12
code review 6214046: CONTRIBUTORS: Add Marius to contributors (issue 6214046)
*** Submitted as e3554a6a8a16 *** CONTRIBUTORS: Add Marius to contributors R=nixiedev CC=nix-dev http
unread,
code review 6214046: CONTRIBUTORS: Add Marius to contributors (issue 6214046)
*** Submitted as e3554a6a8a16 *** CONTRIBUTORS: Add Marius to contributors R=nixiedev CC=nix-dev http
5/15/12
rmin...@gmail.com
, …
Charles Forsyth
19
4/27/12
Re: code review 6060047: linnix: an inferno/nix hybrid for bootstrapping Nix on ... (issue 6060047)
Ron mentioned one possibility (plan9ports) that wasn't available when I did my earlier cross-
unread,
Re: code review 6060047: linnix: an inferno/nix hybrid for bootstrapping Nix on ... (issue 6060047)
Ron mentioned one possibility (plan9ports) that wasn't available when I did my earlier cross-
4/27/12
ron minnich
,
John Floren
3
4/26/12
serial console
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:30 PM, John Floren <jo...@jfloren.net> wrote: > It'll display a
unread,
serial console
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:30 PM, John Floren <jo...@jfloren.net> wrote: > It'll display a
4/26/12
Fco. J. Ballesteros
, …
Charles Forsyth
6
4/25/12
new lsub nix patch: noknixcalls
A system call is a protected procedure (function) call. An asynchronous function is a process! On 15
unread,
new lsub nix patch: noknixcalls
A system call is a protected procedure (function) call. An asynchronous function is a process! On 15
4/25/12
se...@mail.nanosouffle.net
4/24/12
Re: code review 5574049: proc: fix unlock(&procalloc) race (from 9front) (issue 5574049)
Aborted. On 2012/01/23 19:47:13, nemo_lsub.org wrote: > I'm only looking at the diff in the
unread,
Re: code review 5574049: proc: fix unlock(&procalloc) race (from 9front) (issue 5574049)
Aborted. On 2012/01/23 19:47:13, nemo_lsub.org wrote: > I'm only looking at the diff in the
4/24/12
noah....@gmail.com
,
David du Colombier
2
4/18/12
code review 6060047: linnix: an inferno/nix hybrid for bootstrapping Nix on ... (issue 6060047)
> [[ 875 additional files ]] Wow, I'm pretty sure this CL is way to big for rietveld. -- David
unread,
code review 6060047: linnix: an inferno/nix hybrid for bootstrapping Nix on ... (issue 6060047)
> [[ 875 additional files ]] Wow, I'm pretty sure this CL is way to big for rietveld. -- David
4/18/12
noah....@gmail.com
, …
Charles Forsyth
6
4/17/12
code review 6056044: libdynld: add plan9ified libdynld to main tree. (issue 6056044)
Why is Reply-to: never what you want? Anyway: oh, it obviously pre-dated uintptr, by several years in
unread,
code review 6056044: libdynld: add plan9ified libdynld to main tree. (issue 6056044)
Why is Reply-to: never what you want? Anyway: oh, it obviously pre-dated uintptr, by several years in
4/17/12
John Floren
,
ron minnich
2
4/16/12
Re: so, with luckk
Won't be the first time we've said things in email in the heat of the moment we later regret,
unread,
Re: so, with luckk
Won't be the first time we've said things in email in the heat of the moment we later regret,
4/16/12
Nemo
, …
Jeff Sickel
6
4/16/12
patch/pull
Thanks, I did a fresh pull this morning. The timing of the nix.tgz creation may have overlapped the
unread,
patch/pull
Thanks, I did a fresh pull this morning. The timing of the nix.tgz creation may have overlapped the
4/16/12
Francisco J Ballesteros
4/16/12
new development list for the main nix tree
Hi, because I'm tired of discussions regarding what nix...@googlegroups.com for, and because it
unread,
new development list for the main nix tree
Hi, because I'm tired of discussions regarding what nix...@googlegroups.com for, and because it
4/16/12
Nemo
, …
Anthony Martin
14
4/16/12
process
Sure. I'll make the change. On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Anthony Martin wrote: > One request:
unread,
process
Sure. I'll make the change. On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Anthony Martin wrote: > One request:
4/16/12
Fco. J. Ballesteros
, …
erik quanstrom
32
4/15/12
new lsub nix patch: nocontrib
On Sun Apr 15 22:11:54 EDT 2012, jo...@jfloren.net wrote: > I mean that I won't be sending in
unread,
new lsub nix patch: nocontrib
On Sun Apr 15 22:11:54 EDT 2012, jo...@jfloren.net wrote: > I mean that I won't be sending in
4/15/12
Fco. J. Ballesteros
, …
erik quanstrom
5
4/15/12
new lsub nix patch: nsec
On Sun Apr 15 13:11:36 EDT 2012, charles...@gmail.com wrote: > It isn't just cool,
unread,
new lsub nix patch: nsec
On Sun Apr 15 13:11:36 EDT 2012, charles...@gmail.com wrote: > It isn't just cool,
4/15/12
Fco. J. Ballesteros
,
erik quanstrom
5
4/15/12
new lsub nix patch: strdup
;; patch/Apply strdup applying to /n/src/nix... /dist/patch/strdup merge...backup...copy... cpfile
unread,
new lsub nix patch: strdup
;; patch/Apply strdup applying to /n/src/nix... /dist/patch/strdup merge...backup...copy... cpfile
4/15/12
Fco. J. Ballesteros
4/15/12
new lsub nix patch: patchmanfix2
http://lsub.org/magic/webls?dir=/nixpatch/patchmanfix2 More details regarding how to use patch/pull,
unread,
new lsub nix patch: patchmanfix2
http://lsub.org/magic/webls?dir=/nixpatch/patchmanfix2 More details regarding how to use patch/pull,
4/15/12
Fco. J. Ballesteros
4/15/12
new lsub nix patch: nonixcalls
http://lsub.org/magic/webls?dir=/nixpatch/nonixcalls nixcalls are gone, they were an experiment. time
unread,
new lsub nix patch: nonixcalls
http://lsub.org/magic/webls?dir=/nixpatch/nonixcalls nixcalls are gone, they were an experiment. time
4/15/12
Nemo
2
4/15/12
new lsub nix patch: up
There seems to be no objection or comment to this, so ;; patch/Apply up applying to /n/src/nix... /
unread,
new lsub nix patch: up
There seems to be no objection or comment to this, so ;; patch/Apply up applying to /n/src/nix... /
4/15/12
Nemo
4/14/12
http://code.google.com/p/nix-os/
I was going to add a link to a url to browse patches applied at lsub and noticed that as of now only
unread,
http://code.google.com/p/nix-os/
I was going to add a link to a url to browse patches applied at lsub and noticed that as of now only
4/14/12
se...@mail.nanosouffle.net
, …
Akshat Kumar
36
4/13/12
code review 6005053: fmt: change to work with Go (issue 6005053)
Booting as of now. On 13 April 2012 10:20, John Floren <jo...@jfloren.net> wrote: > I'll
unread,
code review 6005053: fmt: change to work with Go (issue 6005053)
Booting as of now. On 13 April 2012 10:20, John Floren <jo...@jfloren.net> wrote: > I'll
4/13/12
Nemo
4/13/12
patch(1) updated
Hi, I just made a few changes to patch(1) so you could patch/pull even if you applied some patches
unread,
patch(1) updated
Hi, I just made a few changes to patch(1) so you could patch/pull even if you applied some patches
4/13/12
nemo...@gmail.com
4/12/12
Re: code review 5977045: nix: sync with plan 9 (issue 5977045)
*** Submitted as bd329fe2476d *** nix: sync with plan 9 R=nixiedev, quanstro CC=nix-dev http://
unread,
Re: code review 5977045: nix: sync with plan 9 (issue 5977045)
*** Submitted as bd329fe2476d *** nix: sync with plan 9 R=nixiedev, quanstro CC=nix-dev http://
4/12/12
erik quanstrom
, …
Charles Forsyth
9
4/11/12
code gone from cc
On Wed Apr 11 18:08:43 EDT 2012, charles...@gmail.com wrote: > People do that a lot? Unlike (
unread,
code gone from cc
On Wed Apr 11 18:08:43 EDT 2012, charles...@gmail.com wrote: > People do that a lot? Unlike (
4/11/12
erik quanstrom
,
Francisco J Ballesteros
2
4/11/12
multiboot header
this is inherited from 9k, and I guess it might be there for Linux, but I don't know for sure. --
unread,
multiboot header
this is inherited from 9k, and I guess it might be there for Linux, but I don't know for sure. --
4/11/12
Akshat Kumar
, …
erik quanstrom
4
4/11/12
(suggestion) codereview server for nix
On Wed Apr 11 16:28:56 EDT 2012, aku...@mail.nanosouffle.net wrote: > Since http://codereview.
unread,
(suggestion) codereview server for nix
On Wed Apr 11 16:28:56 EDT 2012, aku...@mail.nanosouffle.net wrote: > Since http://codereview.
4/11/12
0in...@gmail.com
, …
Charles Forsyth
17
4/10/12
code review 5977045: nix: sync with plan 9 (issue 5977045)
I agree with that. Which hardware was it? I've lost the original discussion. On 11 April 2012 00:
unread,
code review 5977045: nix: sync with plan 9 (issue 5977045)
I agree with that. Which hardware was it? I've lost the original discussion. On 11 April 2012 00:
4/10/12
0in...@gmail.com
,
erik quanstrom
4
4/3/12
Re: code review 5933055: nix: sync with plan 9 (issue 5933055)
*** Abandoned *** http://codereview.appspot.com/5933055/
unread,
Re: code review 5933055: nix: sync with plan 9 (issue 5933055)
*** Abandoned *** http://codereview.appspot.com/5933055/
4/3/12
enrique...@gmail.com
, …
Gorka Guardiola
3
3/30/12
code review 5949043: realloc: bug, realloc does not update tailptr. (issue 5949043)
Lgtm > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:06 PM, <enrique...@gmail.com> wrote: >>
unread,
code review 5949043: realloc: bug, realloc does not update tailptr. (issue 5949043)
Lgtm > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:06 PM, <enrique...@gmail.com> wrote: >>
3/30/12
