Hi Dan,
According to George's blog, he has moved onto other projects.
So Nitro is in need of a new maintainer if it is to stay alive.
I have been doing some work on Og, but even so, it will take more man-
hours than I have to spare to get a new release out any time soon. And
sadly, interest has dwindled so much I'm not even sure if it is worth
it.
T.
_______________________________________________
Nitro-general mailing list
Nitro-...@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
So, George, about that 0.50 release..? :)
Thanks,
Dan
_______________________________________________
Nitro-general mailing list
Nitro-...@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/nitro-general
Cheers-
-Ezra
I saw a demo of Merb <http://merbivore.com/> at the Mountain West
RubyConf last month and was quite impressed. It's focused on
lightweight and flexible and well worth a look.
Ric Turley
Zarac Software
sorry to put a damper on the list, but how can i unsubscribe, the
mailman links don't seem to work for me.
cheers
cornelius
I'm a big fan of both Nitro and Ramaze; Ramaze does seem very much like
Nitro, with perhaps a greater range of pluggable options.
The #ramaze irc channel is very active, and a great place to get help.
Merb, too, is well worth looking at. It may come down to subtleties of
opinion as to which best suits your development style. Both have active
development and strong communities
Ramaze, however, has cooler T-shirts:
http://www.cafepress.com/rubystuff/4904578
:)
--
James Britt
"Discover the recipes you are using and abandon them."
- Brian Eno and Peter Schmidt, Oblique Strategies
T.
It's hard to fight that inertia, and Nitro has been in a murky state
for _well_ more than a year, now.
Want to work on IOWA? ;)
Kirk Haines
Hmm...
Are folks abandoning Og, too? I notice the Ramaze page about
ORM's shows an example using Og, but that they "suggest Sequel."
http://ramaze.net/features:orms
Regards,
Bill
I have moved on to Sequel, and some devs on DataMapper had indicated
they have an Og 'style' in mind for somethings.
However I haven't delved into the DM source.
Cheers
Mark
Yeah, we have to suggest an alternative since Og, combined with the
old facets has quite a few problems and bugs.
I would love to use Og (especially for its awesome evolution
capabilities), but there just hasn't been a stable release since a
long time, so i settled for sequel.
^ manveru
On Apr 23, 7:51 pm, "Michael Fellinger" <m.fellin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Bill Kelly <bi...@cts.com> wrote:
>
> > From: "Trans" <transf...@gmail.com>
>
> > > It seems everyone is pretty well satisfied to turn to alternatives. I
> > > guess shouldn't bother to continue work on Nitro or Og, then?
>
> > Hmm...
>
> > Are folks abandoning Og, too? I notice the Ramaze page about
> > ORM's shows an example using Og, but that they "suggest Sequel."
>
> > http://ramaze.net/features:orms
>
> Yeah, we have to suggest an alternative since Og, combined with the
> old facets has quite a few problems and bugs.
> I would love to use Og (especially for its awesome evolution
> capabilities), but there just hasn't been a stable release since a
> long time, so i settled for sequel.
>
> ^ manveru
I wouldn't take much to get Og up to date. I have been working on it
bit by bit. But I just can't do it alone. I need someone more familiar
with Og to help. Unfortunately no one has really stepped forward. It's
really a shame, IMHO. It's a good system, it just needs some TLC.
T.
I still depend heavily on Og even though I too has switched over to
Ramaze. I've was kind of hoping that Ogden would become my Og
"replacement", but that project seems even more inactive than Nitro
itself (I'm not tracking the rcs, so I actually don't know whether this
is true or not). How far of is Ogden from releasing a gem?
Anyway, I think it would be a shame if Og/Ogden disappeared. I've tried
Sequel and some other ORM:s, but they all seem very "unnatural" to use
compared to Og. I would be very happy if someone picked up the project
and made a new release.
Just my 0.02SEK
/lasso
Bill Kelly skrev:
I too see myself making use of Og over other options if it remains
available. I haven't yet found another option as functional yet simple
that works on all platforms I need.
On Apr 24, 12:28 pm, "George Moschovitis"
<george.moschovi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I DO depend on Og for my current projects so I AM interested in
> helping. I just don't like introducing too many incompatibilities.
> Still, I can help you. What exactly do you need?
Ok. I need to fix the uses of Paramix (that was rewritten in the
latest version of Facets) plus any other minor adjustments to bring it
up to speed with Facets 2.4.x. But then I need some help in tracking
down the cause of the remaining test failures -- I'm having a hard
time isolating them.
The only incompatibility I'm interested in at this point is making
enchantment explicit. But at this point, that can wait for a version
or two.
I'm using the Ogden repo, of course, to isolate from your old working
code. It's currently SVN, but I was thinking of getting it converted
to Git (which is much more like Darcs). Would you appreciate that?
I no longer have problems with this. you can go ahead and do it.
btw, I will push some more changes to my repo when I return to Greece
(I am in Cyprus at the moment)
-g.
--
http://gmosx.me.gr
http://joy.gr
http://cull.gr
http://nitroproject.org
http://phidz.com
http://joyerz.com