21 views

Skip to first unread message

Jun 2, 2023, 12:55:59 PMJun 2

to nimble-users

Dear all,

Coming from Jags/Openbugs, there is a trick that one could use to have and if-like statement to specify likelihood, this being convenient when we know that there is no likelihood in a particular situation.

This can be achieved by having the following structure:

for (i in 1:Range1){

for ( j in 1:Range2){

Coming from Jags/Openbugs, there is a trick that one could use to have and if-like statement to specify likelihood, this being convenient when we know that there is no likelihood in a particular situation.

This can be achieved by having the following structure:

for (i in 1:Range1){

for ( j in 1:Range2){

for(k in 1:Index_if[i,j]) {

Y[i,j] ~ gamma(a[i],b[i])

}

}

}

when Index_if[i,j] == 1, the likelihood is specified and when Index_if[i,j] == 0, it isn't.

Is there an alternative in Nimble or do I have to generate vectors/dataframes that only cover cases where the likelihood needs to be specified ?

Thanks

G

when Index_if[i,j] == 1, the likelihood is specified and when Index_if[i,j] == 0, it isn't.

Is there an alternative in Nimble or do I have to generate vectors/dataframes that only cover cases where the likelihood needs to be specified ?

Thanks

G

Jun 2, 2023, 4:10:40 PMJun 2

to guillaum...@gmail.com, nimble-users

I think this will work fine in nimble as well, although you'll get a warning message (which you can safely ignore, so long as all elements of Index_if[] are either 0 or 1).

Nimble actually has facilities for if() statements inside model code, but it appears those do not work with for-loop indexing of the if() statement conditions.

Here's the example I just tried, the same as what you had. Notice that Index_if is provided in the constants list to nimbleModel().

library(nimble)

code <- nimbleCode({

for(i in 1:N) {

for(j in 1:M) {

code <- nimbleCode({

for(i in 1:N) {

for(j in 1:M) {

for(k in 1:Index_if[i,j]) {

y[i,j] <- 0

}

}

}

})

Index_if <- matrix(c(1,1,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0,1), nrow=5)

constants <- list(N=5, M=2, Index_if=Index_if)

Rmodel <- nimbleModel(code, constants)

Rmodel$getNodeNames()

}

}

}

})

Index_if <- matrix(c(1,1,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0,1), nrow=5)

constants <- list(N=5, M=2, Index_if=Index_if)

Rmodel <- nimbleModel(code, constants)

Rmodel$getNodeNames()

## "y[1, 1]" "y[2, 1]" "y[5, 2]"

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nimble-users" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nimble-users...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nimble-users/650762df-4263-4ed7-923d-cd9681bf414bn%40googlegroups.com.

Jun 5, 2023, 8:13:06 AMJun 5

to nimble-users

Hi Daniel,

Awesome, my issue was that i wasn't using the correct syntax to provide the matrix of index!

Now to code 3 dimensional arrays !

Cheers

G

Jun 5, 2023, 9:45:52 AMJun 5

to nimble-users

follow-up:

when assigning a stochastic node

library(nimble)

}

}

}

})

Index_if <- matrix(c(1,1,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0,1), nrow=5)

constants <- list(N=5, M=2, Index_if=Index_if)

Rmodel <- nimbleModel(code, constants)

the following warning message is generated:

Warning message: In genExpandedNodeAndParentNames3(debug = debug) : Multiple definitions for the same node. Did you forget indexing with 'k' on the left-hand side of 'y[i, j] ~ dbeta(shape1 = 1, shape2 = 1, lower_ = 0, upper_ = 1, .mean = 0.5, .sd = 0.28867513459481287)'?

model compiles and running MCMC seems to work too

just reporting this here in case other people run into this message.

when assigning a stochastic node

library(nimble)

code <- nimbleCode({

for(i in 1:N) {

for(j in 1:M) {

for(k in 1:Index_if[i,j]) {

y[i,j] ~ dbeta(1,1)for(i in 1:N) {

for(j in 1:M) {

for(k in 1:Index_if[i,j]) {

}

}

}

})

Index_if <- matrix(c(1,1,0,0,0, 0,0,0,0,1), nrow=5)

constants <- list(N=5, M=2, Index_if=Index_if)

Rmodel <- nimbleModel(code, constants)

Warning message: In genExpandedNodeAndParentNames3(debug = debug) : Multiple definitions for the same node. Did you forget indexing with 'k' on the left-hand side of 'y[i, j] ~ dbeta(shape1 = 1, shape2 = 1, lower_ = 0, upper_ = 1, .mean = 0.5, .sd = 0.28867513459481287)'?

model compiles and running MCMC seems to work too

just reporting this here in case other people run into this message.

Jun 5, 2023, 10:09:10 AMJun 5

to guillaum...@gmail.com, nimble-users

Yes, this warning is to be expected. It arises because you have a node declaration (y[i,j] ~ ...) which appears *inside a loop indexed by k*, but the declaration itself (y[i,j] ~ ...) is *not* indexed by k, which is most situations would lead to multiple declarations of y[i,j].

This message is not preventable even using nimbleOptions(verbose = FALSE), but I suspect you could suppress this using R's native suppressWarnings() function.

In any case, thanks for following up.

Cheers,

Daniel

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nimble-users/201a3805-7762-4dc7-a179-6bc406c26f0dn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu