Formular 61

[Ortiz Ullery]

Wefind the Smartsheet numbering system not very good as if a value is inputted accidentally and removed it wrecks the auto number and find you have to change from auto number to text/number and repair the auto number and reconfigure it.

So I have been asked to create an auto number formular but with a catch. They one want the auto number to be added to a row. Once a failed check box is selected and this could located anywhere in the sheet ie row 10 then row 20 or row 50 etc.

I suspect this wouldn't be possible as Smartsheet cannot workout the last failed tick box and what auto number was assigned to that row for example QRN-001 in row 32 and the next fail could be in row 56 and would need to be QRN-002.

The only issue is QRN Number, QRN, QRNNUM, AutoCount are all column formulas but the RowID cannot as it doesn't match the syntax on I have worked this out if I can it should work perfectly otherwise it be a manual drag down to populate the cells

Would they be marked as pass/fail sequentially, or could you mark pass/fail on row 53 and then later on mark pass/fail on row 21? Are you able to provide more details as to the actual workflow of the data?

@Paul Newcome This is the problem, once a failed item is checked it needs a sequential number now this can appear in any row we could have 100 pass or just 50 pass then we could have another 200 pass and then a failure and need to carrying on from the last failure QRN number if you need more info please ask

When you are filling in the sheet, do you start at the top and work your way down, or do you skip around? Forget about the sequential numbering for a minute. I need to know how the sheet gets filled out. How are new rows added? When they are added, is the pass/fail already marked, or is that something that gets done later? If done later, do you work your way down from the top marking the pass/fail, or do you skip around?

@Paul Newcome Thanks for this it does do the job, but is there anyway we can not use a auto number as if a row is deleted it throws the auto numbering out of sequence and you have to edit the auto number. If not I will advise this is the only option we have.

@Paul Newcome Doing further testing it does not quite fit the bill once it gets to 10 it goes out of sequence and found the answer its the auto number causing the number once the correct auto number is back in sequence the formular works as expected.

I'm trying include a date range with counting the number of applicants within various depts, in certain date ranges, but it's saying incorrect argument set. =COUNTIFS(DISTINCT([Name of Requestor]:[Name of Requestor], [Submission Date]:[Submission Date], AND(@cell > DATE (2023, 9, 30), @cell

The Coda extension from the chrome web store ( -browser-extension/cdgkmagmdldlpiglliebaajdpdkigcbi) lets you select a doc, a table, and the corresponding columns for the URL and the bookmark title which you can modify if you like.

Now my question. I would like to copy an URL into a table column, and then create another column that displays the title of the web page. I know the formular embed () which displays a preview of the URL. Is there any formular in Coda which I can use to display the web page title. Same question for a formular that displays the card view of an URL?

Good morning guys, I have created a "Search Box" in my excel worksheet by coping a video of "How to add a search box in Excel" but I must have something wrong in the formular as it's not searching the rows or column I need it to. My problem is, I can't seem to even bring up the formular to be able to fix it. Where do I go to locate the formular so I can repair it?

@HansVogelaar mate here is a link to my work sheet. There's no real sensitive information so have a look at it and... What I was trying to do was, search for a type of part I've fitting during the rebuild whith out having to scroll through the whole work sheet, for example, the name of a supplier or an actual part. I must have selected too many rows or something. Anyway, just being able to find the formular would be a good start.

I've had to disable Macro in all my spreadsheets to be able to "Auto Save" in Onedrive. I use Onedrive for all my files. I've had to go back to a previous version of this spreadsheet because even though I have gone into settings and disabled Marco it still won't Auto Save. This stuff is very frustrating as I don't understand the process fully, very complicated.....

The term formular (often misspelled formula) is an adjective applied to envelopes, cards and aerograms, etc., produced by postal authorities or to their specification, but bearing no imprinted or embossed stamp or other indication of prepayment of postage.

Formular stationery require the addition of an adhesive stamp before posting.[1] Formular items do not technically meet the definition of "postal stationery" (since there is no prepayment of postage), but the strong likeness to it secures them a place in many postal stationery collections.[1][2]

This is quite cumbersome especially with huge formulars, is there any other way?

I cannot really change the data I get from the datasource, it is a SQL-Server like system, we need to achieve it within Grafana

This is possible as mentioned already in my inital post by stacking several binary operations and also mention by @joachimschiewek. However it is cumbersome stacking so many binary operations if the mathematical formular contains lots of parameters.

The print from the z-program works fine. But when i start my function module and the print comes out, all the fields in the formular are empty. I don't know what i'm making wrong. It is the same formular with the same input and i can see when i debug, that the fields in my function module are filled.

Which is the optimal thickness to construct? as you can see, the 0.4 line is missing. The first printed line is 0.5mm. But is 0.5 or 0.55 optimal? I do not know. This example has no XY-Offset which I normally use for exact measured print. This makes the problem bigger.

Enable Print Settings->Layers and perimeters->Quality->Detect thin walls to print narrower walls (up to a limit). Your extrusion widths (see Advanced tab) are wider than the 0.40mm wall, so it is normally skipped. You can't normally print extrusions narrower than your nozzle size. This setting lets you go narrower.

For information on the automatic extrusion widths varying by layer height, I suggest reading through this thread. You can always override them under Print Settings->Advanced. Note that PrusaSlicer inherits the behavior of Slic3r and will add gap fill and slightly tweak extrusion widths to provide a solid top surface as needed.

THX for the thread, but I ca not find a formular. I want to precalculate the optimal wall thickness, before I start to construct / draw. I know the quality I want to print (Layerheight) and nearly the wallthickness. I want to avoid small extra lines (0.9mm) (the sixth from the right in the picture. Is the sourcecode available from PrusaSlicer? Does anybody knows, where to find the printout from above?

If your question is regarding the general construction of thin walls, then my best practice is either 1mm or 1.3mm. This gives people (and me) room to either use default slicer settings or optimize for my needs in the slicer.

It ultimately comes down to how many extrusions (perimeters) you can print and still have acceptable finish and strength. You have to define whether "optimal" means finish, print time or strength or some combination of these factors.

The fewer extrusions, the faster the print. As you can see from your test piece, there are several wall thicknesses that will print a wall using 1 perimeter, a few with 2 and so on. If you're concerned about print times and strength, using a larger nozzle will make a significant difference in print time as well as strength. If you're worried about finish, narrower extrusion widths on external perimeters can help.

And - why all the effort to try to predetermine minuscule changes in each and every extrusion width? A person will need MathCAD and the full map and plan of the extrusions to do it justice. You might as well write your own slicer if you are that concerned.

I design a wall 1.875 mm thick. The slicer does all the math. If the wall is wrong after a print, and contraction and shrinkage and printer variation can't account for it, the I write a github bug report and let the devs fix their code.

Still don't get it what you're trying to achieve. Beside of that this are all variables users can and do change. And there are more parameters like overlap and filament flow rate which influence the amount of plastic extruded.

All that work will only be useful if every free-standing wall is exactly the same thickness. Once you get to a part of the print with solid infill, the amount of time printing a perimeter of 0.40mm and another of 0.45mm will be the same as you're not extruding at the hotend's maximum rate. They'll both move at the same speed.

If you're designing the part, just make sure walls provide the stability you need. Parts tend to shear along the horizontal plane, so you definitely don't want to make an "optimized" wall that will be fragile in use. Make them "wide enough" and let the slicer work out the number of extrusions.

If you just want to minimize print time while increasing strength, use a larger nozzle. With a large enough nozzle, you can maintain wall thickness while reducing the number of perimeter lines to be printed. That is where you will save considerable time.

3a8082e126