Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Northern Ireland politicians' websites

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Nicholas Whyte

unread,
Nov 20, 2001, 10:00:38 AM11/20/01
to
The SDLP (main website at http://www.sdlp.ie/sdlp/) appear to be the
most "wired" political party in Northern Ireland at present. Six of
their MLA's, plus John Hume, have their own websites as follows:

John Hume (Foyle): http://www.johnhume.ie/
P.J. Bradley (S Down): http://www.pjbradley.com/
Joe Byrne (W Tyrone): http://www.joe-byrne-mla.com/
Sean Farren (N Antrim): http://www.seanfarren.com/
Tommy Gallagher (Fermanagh S Tyrone): http://www.tommygallagher.com/
Eddie McGrady (S Down): http://www.eddiemcgrady.com/
Danny O'Connor (E Antrim): http://www.dannyoconnor.net/

In second place are the UUP (see also http://www.uup.org/), four of
whose MLA's have their own sites:
Ian Adamson (E Belfast): http://www.ianadamson.co.uk/
Billy Armstrong (Mid Ulster): http://www.billyarmstrong.co.uk/
Roy Beggs Jr (E Antrim): http://www.roy-beggs.fsnet.co.uk/
Jim Wilson (S Antrim): http://www.jimwilsonuup.org.uk/

Third comes Alliance (main site at http://www.allianceparty.org/) two
of whose MLA's have sites:
Lord Alderdice (E Belfast):
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/john.alderdice/
David Ford (S Antrim): http://www.davidford.org/

Only one DUP representative maintains his own site, and it doesn't
really cover his political activities which are dealt with via the
main party site at http://www.dup.org.uk/:
Rev Ian Paisley (N Antrim): http://www.ianpaisley.com/

The following parties (all of which had candidates in the 2001
elections) have web-sites but none of their elected representatives
has set up a personal one:
Sinn Fein: http://sinnfein.ie/
UK Unionist Party: http://www.ukup.org/
Northern Ireland Unionist Party: http://www.niup.org/
Progressive Unionist Party: http://www.pup-ni.org.uk/
Northern Ireland Women's Coalition: http://www.niwc.org/
Northern Ireland Conservatives: http://www.conservativesni.com/
Workers Party: http://www.workers-party.org/
Ulster Third Way: http://www.ulsternation.org.uk/

Other parties which have been active include:
Labour (NI): http://www.labourni.org/
Socialist Party (Northern Ireland):
http://www.geocities.com/socialistparty/
Natural Law Party: http://www.personal.u-net.com/~natlaw/ni.htm
Ulster Christian Democratic Party: http://ucdp.bizhosting.com/

The UDP used to have a website at www.udp.org but this is now a porn
site. Likewise the NI Greens' site has disappeared.

Finally, although the United Unionist Assembly Party has no website,
councillor and MLA Boyd Douglas does. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to
have been updated since before the 1998 elections - see
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/1036/

Corerctions and additions welcome as always.

Nicholas Whyte
See NI Elections site at http://explorers.whyte.com/
My real email address is explorers (at) whyte (dot) com

Paul Linehan

unread,
Nov 22, 2001, 10:24:59 AM11/22/01
to

nichol...@hotmail.com (Nicholas Whyte) wrote:


>The UDP used to have a website at www.udp.org but this is now a porn
>site.


Quite appropriate I would have thought - UDP standing for "Use Dog
Poo" (against primary school girls on the Ardoyne), what with them and
their militarists in the Ulster Dickheads' Association.


> Likewise the NI Greens' site has disappeared.


True enough - very few real greens left these days...


Paul...


>Nicholas Whyte

JAT

unread,
Nov 22, 2001, 5:07:20 PM11/22/01
to

"Paul Linehan" <plin...@not.a.chance.ie> wrote in message
news:3bfd181b...@news1.eircom.net...
Hopefully there will be a lot fewer in the future.

JAT


Cadiz

unread,
Nov 23, 2001, 6:58:00 PM11/23/01
to
In article <3bfd181b...@news1.eircom.net>, plin...@not.a.chance.ie says...

>
>
> nichol...@hotmail.com (Nicholas Whyte) wrote:
>
>
>>The UDP used to have a website at www.udp.org but this is now a porn
>>site.
>
>
>Quite appropriate I would have thought - UDP standing for "Use Dog
>Poo" (against primary school girls on the Ardoyne), what with them and
>their militarists in the Ulster Dickheads' Association.

Pornographic pictures were pushed into the faces of the Holy Cross kids. The
Glenbyrn 'protestors' are not the sort of neighbours civilized people need to
have, they are child abusing perverts.

Cadiz

gregory....@ntlworld.com

unread,
Nov 23, 2001, 8:49:32 PM11/23/01
to

Nicholas Whyte wrote:

>
> The UDP used to have a website at www.udp.org but this is now a porn
> site. Likewise the NI Greens' site has disappeared.

That might explain how the Glenbyrn child abusers were able to get their
hard core porn to harass the Holy Cross schoolkids. I had to intervene
to try and prevent the RUC/PSNI from confiscating a video camera. The
harassment of the little kids with pornography was one of the reasons
the parents wanted to film the outrages.

I also asked the NSPCC (in Northern Ireland) to look at one of our
videos but they've as yet to accept my kind offer. I think I know why.
They're possibly scared in case they have to issue a statement about the
sick loyalist porn which was being thrust in front of the scared little
kids. The NSPCC were not very interested in helping the Holy Cross kids.

Wrong race and wrong religion and wrong part of the UK, if they'd been
Jewish or Asian and living in another part of the United Kingdom they'd
have been helped and the NSPCC would have been on the bandwagon doing
the helping. It is racism at it's worst in my opinion.

I'm raising the NSPCC issue with several socialist MEPs. They've no
right to be linked to UNICEF unless they are prepared to advocate for
children without using race or religion as criteria and that was what
they were doing. The Holy Cross children were betrayed by the NSPCC in
my opinion.

--
Respectfully submitted

Gregory

Friend

unread,
Nov 27, 2001, 12:19:44 AM11/27/01
to
People like Falcon (the cop) Merrick, and all the other loyalist shites will
tell you that it was the children's fault anyway and not the poor loyalist
protesters. THE CHILDREN ARE AT FAULT They upset the poor loyalists and
forced them to attempt murder with pipe bombs, Nasty children.
Cadiz <ca...@law.com> wrote in message news:9tmnq...@drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <3bfd181b...@news1.eircom.net>,


.·´¯) Telmey¸(¯`·.¸

unread,
Nov 27, 2001, 8:08:56 PM11/27/01
to
"Friend" <Frien...@pals.com> wrote:

>People like Falcon (the cop) Merrick, and all the other loyalist shites will
>tell you that it was the children's fault anyway and not the poor loyalist
>protesters. THE CHILDREN ARE AT FAULT They upset the poor loyalists and
>forced them to attempt murder with pipe bombs, Nasty children.

this one needs feeding once.

Would you like to show one post where anyone has said "THE CHILDREN ARE
AT FAULT" Republican, government or loyalist?

Harry Merrick

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 12:41:48 PM11/30/01
to
Friend wrote:

(A). I am not Falcon.
(B). I am certainly not Loyalist, shite or otherwise.
(C). Your post is so badly composed as to be virtually meaningless.
(D). If you had enough education to be able to make sense out of what you read,
you would see that I have many times, in various posts, said precisely what you
claim: That the Children originated the cause by abusing and intimidating OAP's,
residents who happen to be Protestants. There were many other problems as well,
not least with the local Protestant residents being denied the use of the
Ardoyne shops. However, the Protestant community did not help themselves either,
walking very foolishly directly into the PR trap set for them and orchestrated
by Sinn Féin/IRA supporters.
(E). So do stop being such a silly Republican shite!

LOL!

Harry Merrick.


0 new messages