Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Speed Cameras and July 12th bonfires

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Rad

unread,
Jul 11, 2003, 9:40:19 AM7/11/03
to
As the witching hour approaches can I make a plea for sanity. If there
is a traffic camera nearby pile a few spare tyres around it and torch
the bugger.

Exercises on the mainland and in Holland have proved they burn well.
It will be too expensive to replace them all. The are a fucked up
Fascist revenue collecting idea which prevents nothing and cause
unexpected braking manouvers.

All it takes to *really* prevent accidents at blackspots are rumble
strips and/or low bumps.

By introducing the expensive cameras rather than those real cheaper
*effective* measures the NI administration are following a Luddite
anti-transport minority led initiative on the mainland and condeming
more people to misery.

Have you seen the recent TV ad? in effect:
Break a meaningless speed limit while driving perfectly safely and you
might lose your job and have your life destroyed.
What a bunch of utter cunts. Who is the lower form of life, those who
thought it up or the gutless TV channels who carry it.

David Cleland

unread,
Jul 11, 2003, 10:55:35 AM7/11/03
to
I fear the result would be that those that survive torching would become
over sensitive to cover cost of replacements and new cameras.

Although given the automation of these cameras I wonder what would happen if
you changed your number plate to someone you didn't like and went on a burn
round town :)

David


"Rad" <radic...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:5a828038.0307...@posting.google.com...

Harry Merrick

unread,
Jul 11, 2003, 12:35:29 PM7/11/03
to

"David Cleland" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:105793534...@damia.uk.clara.net...

> I fear the result would be that those that survive torching would become
> over sensitive to cover cost of replacements and new cameras.
>
> Although given the automation of these cameras I wonder what would happen
if
> you changed your number plate to someone you didn't like and went on a
burn
> round town :)

Now theres a *really* good idea! - I wonder noone has tried it yet!

Harry Merrick.


Chesney Christ

unread,
Jul 11, 2003, 4:40:32 PM7/11/03
to
A certain Rad, of ni.politics "fame", writes :

>Exercises on the mainland and in Holland have proved they burn well.
>It will be too expensive to replace them all. The are a fucked up
>Fascist revenue collecting idea which prevents nothing and cause
>unexpected braking manouvers.

There is a very simple way to avoid paying fines.

BTW, there is a direct statistical link between speed and road death.

--

"Jokes mentioning ducks were considered particularly funny." - cnn.com

Harry Merrick

unread,
Jul 11, 2003, 5:48:25 PM7/11/03
to
"Chesney Christ" <thegreat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:+xTh+uEADyD$Ew...@ntlworld.com...

> A certain Rad, of ni.politics "fame", writes :
>
> >Exercises on the mainland and in Holland have proved they burn well.
> >It will be too expensive to replace them all. The are a fucked up
> >Fascist revenue collecting idea which prevents nothing and cause
> >unexpected braking manouvers.
>
> There is a very simple way to avoid paying fines.
>
> BTW, there is a direct statistical link between speed and road death.

Yea, I've always wondered about that. It is *not* speed that actually kills, by that I mean high speeds. Speed only makes the accident worse and therefor more likely to cause death and major injury. The real cause is bloody carelessness, bad driving, drunk driving and selfish behaviour.

So, perhaps you, Brendan, can explain to me how it is that the statistic refers to speed only? - Surely, the statistic should be about carelessness, driving without due care and attention etc?

Interestingly, I have just driven from Northern Ireland through Scotland and across England to Italy and back, plus many miles touring, and never came across any radar traps apart from a few fixed cameras. Unless of course my expensive radar detector isn't working, which I doubt. I just wonder how interested the various police forces actually are in curbing road deaths!

Harry Merrick.

David Cleland

unread,
Jul 12, 2003, 5:35:20 AM7/12/03
to

> Now theres a *really* good idea! - I wonder noone has tried it yet!
>
> Harry Merrick.

Harry email you registration number and I will give it a try :)

David

Rad

unread,
Jul 23, 2003, 11:11:33 AM7/23/03
to
Chesney Christ <thegreat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<+xTh+uEADyD$Ew...@ntlworld.com>...
> A certain Rad, of ni.politics "fame", writes :
>
> >Exercises on the mainland and in Holland have proved they burn well.
> >It will be too expensive to replace them all. The are a fucked up
> >Fascist revenue collecting idea which prevents nothing and cause
> >unexpected braking manouvers.
>
> There is a very simple way to avoid paying fines.
>
> BTW, there is a direct statistical link between speed and road death.

If you mean that higher speed accidents have a greater death rate then
it seems likely but 70 or 90mph the result is likely to be the same.
The majority of all the RTA's happen at <40mph however. I was arguing
for something that actually slows someone down and notifies them
approaching a genuine blackspot. I would also argue that if you cannot
attain the basic level of taught driving skill as used by the mainland
Police then you should never hold a licence. I wouldn't mind if you
then had to make Class1 within (say) 2 years.

0 new messages