ConfORM vs NHibernate's mapping by code

85 views
Skip to first unread message

cidico

unread,
Jan 13, 2013, 8:57:40 PM1/13/13
to nhu...@googlegroups.com
Hi!

I'm using confORM for more than 1 year and I really like the way it handles mapping by convention.
I was just wondering if the project is "dead" (since the home page says that it has 0 current contributors) and the recommended way to do mapping-by-code is using NHibernate default tool.

A long time ago I remember that Fabio Maulo said that ConfORM was ahead of NHibernate implementation because it was made outside NH's trunks and little by little added to the NH's trunk.
It still true?

What are you guys currently using?
Is the NH's mapping-by-code as good as the ConfORM?

I really appreciate if you could give some insights about using the NH's default too, you know, pros and cons... :)

Thanks in advance!

Plácido Bisneto

Darren Kopp

unread,
Jan 14, 2013, 11:27:19 PM1/14/13
to nhu...@googlegroups.com
conform uses built-in mapping. conform is really just a set of pre-built conventions and maybe a few utilities.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages