I use both NH and EF for many different projects. There are cases where EF
is clearly superior and cases where NH is the winner. I do not see it as
better/worse, but more of the right tool for the system and desired
architecture.
David
Hi Tom,
Marcelo Grossi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to nhu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nhusers+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Here’s a link about ESE, the underlying Windows store that RavenDB uses - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Storage_Engine.
From the article:
Extensible Storage Engine (ESE), also known as JET Blue, is an Indexed Sequential Access Method (ISAM) data storage technology from Microsoft. ESE is notably a core of Microsoft Exchange Server and Active Directory. Its purpose is to allow applications to store and retrieve data via indexed and sequential access. Windows Mail and Desktop Search in the Windows Vista operating system also make use of ESE to store indexes and property information respectively.
Hmm... what mean "Ms essent."?
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Frederic wrote:
Raven is à layer over Ms essent.(nicely packaged)
For heavy calculation on temporal data, rdbms are not à good choice. You should look for mongo, membase, or even appfabric.
My 2 cents.
F.
Envoyé de mon iPhone