On 26/08/2015, Jonathan Kay <
jonath...@ndcls.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> Excellent idea. Agree with Marcus.
>
> 1 Those long delays are partly about finding acceptable wording, but IMNSHO
> they are also caused by FUD and the time it takes for the participating
> organisation to learn how to agree. So the ideal software would help in
> finding those words but would also make it easier, quicker and cheaper to
> learn to trust each other and agree.
>
> 2 From here on everything needs to include social care etc.
>
> Some much less important points:
>
> 3 Worth looking at some computer interpretation stuff especially from the
> legal and contract worlds.
>
> 4 There’s some interesting experience in the Netherlands on online
> mediation/ arbitration systems that are much quicker to achieve resolution
> than traditional legal processes.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> On 26 Aug 2015, at 12:21, Marcus Baw
> <
marc...@gmail.com<mailto:
marc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> I don't know of anyone in the NHS Hack Day community doing this - BUT I am
> aware that there are moves to do something like this at HSCIC, work being
> led by Kemi Adenubi and Peter Short I believe. They are trying to develop a
> 'generic' or 'template' ISA as a starting point, one that would fulfil most
> requirements and would ony need tweaking for specific circumstances or
> particular uses between organisations.
>
> The worry about the HSCIC approach is that although it would have the
> gravitas of a 'centrally issued' guideline it probably won't be agile enough
> to change with a very rapidly evolving health IT environment, and it might
> take a long time to be issued. It will also without doublt be published as a
> PDF large enough to have it's own gravity.
>
> I guess what you are instead proposing is some kind of 'machine readable'
> ISA in which the 'rules' in an ISA document are converted into some kind of
> machine readable format, with a human interface allowing an organisation to
> easily set up what it is and isn't willing to share, and this be
> automatically interpretable by the software?
>
> One person you might wish to discuss this with is Amir Mehrkar who is CCIO
> of the Hampshire Health Record, and has had a lot of experience of this kind
> of thing, plus he's been to NHS Hack Day and understands the ethos. Maybe
> you could connect with him (I've cc'd him in) and ask if he's up for it.
>
> Marcus
>
> On 26 August 2015 at 10:48, Matt Stibbs
> <
matts...@gmail.com<mailto:
matts...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering whether anyone has considered creating a tool for
> digitising (and significantly streamlining) the creation of the dreaded
> Information Sharing Agreements between different organisations / parties?
>
> Whenever I hear stories of how many hours are dedicated to getting ISAs set
> up and approved in order to enable information sharing across a community,
> it always feels like there has got to be an easier way...
>
> --
>