On 10/25/2012 3:57 PM, m...@facts.only.now wrote:
> he never held a leadership
> role or raised or donated money for the state party.
And we know how you paid Dem shills love to get a twin-killing on
Mormons and TEA.
Btw, the latest Obama-lie:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-wrong-his-own-iraq-positions_655305.html
The New York Times corrects President Barack Obama:
"President Obama suggested that Mr. Romney was mistaken in seeking to
keep 10,000 American troops in Iraq. But the Obama administration
initially sought to do just that � and ultimately never managed to
negotiate an agreement to allow any American troops in Iraq.
"Mr. Obama sought to negotiate a Status of Forces Agreement that would
have allowed United States troops to stay in Iraq after 2011. Initially,
the Obama administration was prepared to keep up to 10,000 troops in
Iraq. Later, the Obama administration lowered the figure to about 5,000
troops � some 3,500 of which would be continuously based in the country
while the remainder would periodically be rotated through. The role of
the American forces would be to train Iraqi troops, patrol Iraq�s skies
and help Iraqi commandos fight Al Qaeda.
"Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki indicated that he might be willing
to work out an agreement to allow some American troops to stay. But the
Iraqis did not agree to an American demand that such an agreement be
submitted to their parliament for approval, a step the Obama
administration insisted was needed to ensure that any American troops
that stayed would be immune from prosecution under Iraqi law."