Sincerely,
--
Trevor Penney,
A+, Network+ Certified
----------------------
That's alright, I still got my guitar...
But honestly, it really isn't a problem if the smoking area was "caged"
in... With the Tim Horton's policy, the resturant is still considered a
smoke-free resturant with the "cage" in place...*s*
Brad
"Brad" <br...@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:8j9kvd$5e7$1...@nova.thezone.net...
RGP
"Hendrix" <tg...@thezone.net> wrote in message
news:39583D69...@thezone.net...
> Are there any smoking Tim Horton's Resturants left in St. John's...
> Someone told me that there were two: The one on Harvey's Road, and
> another (owned by the same woman who own's Harvey's Road Tims) on
> Elizabeth or Torbay...???
>
> Sincerely,
Alyssa
"Stephen Martin" <sma...@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:8j9gac$3k0$1...@nova.thezone.net...
> Last time i was @ tim's on ropewalk lane they had the smokers in a glassed
> off area .Looked like caged animals in a cloud of smoke :)
> Best place for them too .Smoking in public area's should be 100 % banned .
"RGP" <rpri...@nospam.roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:8jab96$cl7$1...@nova.thezone.net...
> Ropewalk lane is smokefree now. So is Elizabeth Ave. Not sure about
Major's
> Path and/or Harvey Rd
>
> RGP
>
>
Jodi
Hendrix wrote:
> Are there any smoking Tim Horton's Resturants left in St. John's...
> Someone told me that there were two: The one on Harvey's Road, and
> another (owned by the same woman who own's Harvey's Road Tims) on
> Elizabeth or Torbay...???
>
> Sincerely,
> --
> Trevor Penney,
> A+, Network+ Certified
> ----------------------
> That's alright, I still got my guitar...
--
Ian and Jodi McDavid-Brodie
mcdavid...@sympatico.ca
see you in the obits..........*joking*..... :-))
: > Are there any smoking Tim Horton's Resturants left in St. John's...
: Ropewalk lane is smokefree now. So is Elizabeth Ave. Not sure about Major's
: Path and/or Harvey Rd.
And they say the jokes about policemen and donuts are one ugly
stereotype ... ;-)
: RGP
Piotr Trela
This is a really bad example but here goes, smoking is considered an
addiction, a lot of medical types consider an addiction a disability, now
smokers have to smoke out side, no smokes allowed in here, GET OUT! ok now
comes the bad example, who would people react if the same was done for other
disabilities, such as, no wheel chairs allow, get out!?? hmm I don't think
it would go over well, and I believe its required by law to accommodate
disabilities, such as having wheel chair access, etc. Don't you think that
the same should be done for smokers with the disability of being hooked on
tobacco products, a lot of people just can't quit. Please don't get upset
over my wheel chair comments, its just an example of a disability, and I'm
not saying get rid of wheel chair access or anything like that, I think its
great that they are treated as normal people and things are being done and
have been done to make them more comfortable. But I don't see why people
with a smoking problem should be treated different than a non-smoker, just
because they have an addiction doesn't mean they are not regular people.
"Debbie Rothman" <rotht...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20000628021618...@ng-fh1.aol.com...
I don't think you can compare someone in a wheelchair with someone who
smokes. A person in a wheelchair will not adversely effect the health of
people around him/her, but a person who smokes will.
"Piotr Trela" <ptr...@morgan.ucs.mun.ca> wrote in message
news:8jd4uo$sb$4...@coranto.ucs.mun.ca...
Seriously though, I agree with you. I thought that the glass
partition in the Tim's outlets was the best solution I had ever
seen for keeping both groups happy, and I can't for the life of
me figure out why they did away with it.
I am a smoker. I have tried to quit a number of times (made it
two years once), but I always wind up back where I started.
Frankly, I am sick of being treated as a social pariah. I
understand the health concerns of those who do not smoke,
they are valid, and I don't want to endanger the health of
anyone by forcing them to accept exposure to my smoke as a
condition of entering a commercial establishment. This is why
I considered the glass enclosure to be such a great solution.
Smokers and non-smokers could both frequent the same
establishment without getting in to each other's airspace.
I haven't been inside the Tim's here since they went smoke free.
That'll be $1.20, please drive thru......
Best Regards
Roger Wiertz
Gander
SPAMBLOCK ALERT: remove THIS from the addy to reply by email
- Charlie
"Michael A. Budden" <mbu...@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:8jb2fp$mpt$1...@nova.thezone.net...
> They got that glassed off area removed. It is all non smoking now. (Which
I
> say ticked off a lot of people, because smokers like to have a smoke with
> their cup of coffee.)
> "Stephen Martin" <sma...@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
> news:8j9gac$3k0$1...@nova.thezone.net...
> > Last time i was @ tim's on ropewalk lane they had the smokers in a
glassed
> > off area .Looked like caged animals in a cloud of smoke :)
> > Best place for them too .Smoking in public area's should be 100 % banned
.
> > "Hendrix" <tg...@thezone.net> wrote in message
> > news:39583D69...@thezone.net...
> > > Are there any smoking Tim Horton's Resturants left in St. John's...
Sorry, no matter how many people tell her to stop, that won't work:
Nobody likes being nagged.
--
Joseph Bullen, B.Sc. Computer Science
jbu...@plato.ucs.mun.ca
patrick
Hendrix (tg...@thezone.net) wrote:
: Stephen Martin wrote:
: >
: > Last time i was @ tim's on ropewalk lane they had the smokers in a glassed
: > off area .Looked like caged animals in a cloud of smoke :)
: > Best place for them too .Smoking in public area's should be 100 % banned .
: But honestly, it really isn't a problem if the smoking area was "caged"
: in... With the Tim Horton's policy, the resturant is still considered a
: smoke-free resturant with the "cage" in place...*s*
: --
: Trevor Penney,
: A+, Network+ Certified
: ----------------------
: That's alright, I still got my guitar...
--
************************************
Rick Maloney *
Metal Rules!! www.metal-rules.com * ************************************
Promoting Metal Online Since 1995 * * 1985 Honda V45 Magna "Dragonfire"*
* * "Its Better To Rule in Hell *
rmal...@roadrunner.nf.net * * Than To Serve In Heaven" *
************************************ * "Milton" *
************************************
> trying to restrict the rights of smokers just serves to prove
Where is it written that _you_ have a *right* to compromise _my_ health? A
body requires oxygen at birth (and throughout life)... if you choose to
deprive yourself, that's just fine. You have no *right* to do the same to
me. Smoking isn't a *right* (that's a word used far too freely) smoking is
a choice. You can choose (note the word *choose* vs *right*) to smoke, I
can't, however, choose not to inhale. That said, I've no problem with
smokers... you want to smoke, knock your socks off. Just do it in your own
space. I should have as much of this _right_ as yourself to patronize any
establishment I choose without worrying about my health, or how my clothes
may smell later. Quick analogy (this is going on recall): I like beer.
Urine is the residue of my drug of choice. You like smoking. Smoke is the
residue of your drug of choice. Your residue covers my lungs and clothes.
How'd you like if I stood on a chair and urinated all over you and your
clothes? But that's different, right? Why is your choice a "right" even
when it clearly has an effect on others?
> that politically(in)correct dumb FUCKS
Not at all, pal. It's called common sense and respect for other's and their
health.
Regards,
Thomas
JM
"Jeff Mackey" <mac...@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:3973B9CF...@roadrunner.nf.net...
JM
Acctually, there are several reasons why most smoke rooms were
taken down, including they were really hard to keep clean. (I work at
Tims on Harvey Rd.) You would NOT believe what the air filter taking the
air out of the fishbowl (my little nic for it). In a matter of 4 months,
there was that much buildup in the filter that the stuff we removed,
looked like soggy paper, and there was literally a couple of punds of the
stuff. This is not a big vent, and by no means a small meshed filter
system. The holes in the filter are about 1 square cm and the filter
itself is about a foot and half square. The tiles in the roof have to be
re-painted, not cleaned. And when you take a picture off the wall, you
can still see where it is and the spot it was is several shades lighter.
It's acctually fairly expansive haveing to do that every couple of
months, and not all Tims see the fishbowl as a necissity. And another
reason was that we were having problems keeping the staff in uniform from
staying out there before, during, and after their shift. (Tims staff are
not allowed to smoke during their shift, or in uniform.)
Some people may think that removing a smokeroom would decrease
the sales in that store, well, they are mistaken. The very small drop in
customers in no way outweighed the cost of maintaining a fishbowl. Most
smokers who used to come into a store and sit down and enjoy a coffee
with their cigarrette simply take their coffee to go. And the few
customers who stopped going to the stores without fishbowls simply went
to the two stores left with them (which are both owned by the same lady,
and who also owns another 5 stores that are now smoke free) So, she
didn't really loose any income, it just kinda got shifted around, and she
saved a few bucks in the process.
Just in case I get a whole bunch of people say "But how do YOU
know?" Like I said, I've worked there for a little over 2 years now, and
you learn a lot, besides, I've had this discussion with several of the
managers, and even general managers.
--
--Barry
: So, as an employee, you'd be more than happy to remove the smokerooms?
Well, not really, it doesn't both me much, not only do I not
smoke, but I also don't clean the smokerooms. :) I'm a baker. :)
: As well, you can't smoke on your breaks? The staff I work with at McD's would
: love that one...they'd all quit :)
: JM
Acctually, we have like one of the higest turnover rates in the
industry. I've been working there for a little over 2 years and I've
literally seen hundreds of people go through there. And it wouldn't be
so bad, but there's never any more than 30 staff at any given time. :)
Barry