Where's Lynn Burry ? NTV NEWS
Michael Bearns
where is Len Burry.......... Does anyone know? Just Curious!
Scott Martin
Dave & Tina
something involving the Murray Premises.This was in December,and the day
after I heard this she was on a 2-3 week vacation.Coincidence??
Dave
Mark C. Hunter
Mark..
Nathan Szabo
Gone permanently, I hope.
--
Future Toni-Marie fan club president
Brad Priddle
I would like to join the Toni-Marie fan club please. I'm serious. I'd wish
she loosen up abit while she does the news...she's too serious.
Fred Hutton is alright...he's the school glue that keeps NTV's news
together. There's a abit of Doug Letto in him.
Nathan Szabo <sz...@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:37055613...@roadrunner.nf.net...
Michael Bearns
Nathan Szabo
Michael Bearns wrote:
> Who pissed in your corn flakes this mourning................
Lynn Burry did
Nathan Szabo
Brad Priddle wrote:
> I didn't even realize she was gone until I read this group!!
>
> I would like to join the Toni-Marie fan club please. I'm serious. I'd wish
> she loosen up abit while she does the news...she's too serious.
>
Maybe I should draw up the club charter?!!
Yeah, Toni-marie does need to looen up a bit, she also needs to get her hair
out of her face, so that we can see more of that beautiful face of hers.
fi...@roadrunner.nf.net
Lynn Burry is! Remember News is News........ and YES i think it is our business,
She is a public figure......... Still Curious..... Hard to get a right answer to
a simple question......... Maybe one of NTV's reporters can give us the
scope......... I'll bet you the details are sketchy............. LOL sign
Mikey
Cormac McManamon wrote:
> I also believe that her husband was quite ill, my friends. Before you
> people devolve into shitting on the local celebrities of the day, it
> behooves you to do your homework. I hope you won't mind wiping the egg
> off your faces or putting a foot in your respective gobs.
>
> Cormac
Cormac McManamon
Cormac McManamon
little more sensitive before you fire off stuff like that. I think that
people should be VERY careful about drawing inferences, as you seem to
have done here, without coming remotely close to knowing all the facts.
I'm sorry if you feel embarrassed, or something, but I think that everyone
should know this collateral fact before jumping to some kind of conclusion
about Ms. Burry.
In accordance with your wishes, I am not going to direct this e-mail to
you, but instead, I will send it to "nf.general" as a whole. Please cool
down, Sir.
Regards,
Cormac
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Dave & Tina wrote:
> Also I add to that don't ever fucking send me mail again!!!
>
> Cormac McManamon wrote:
> >
> > I also believe that her husband was quite ill, my friend. Before you
Dave & Tina
paper and leave us alone.I don't feel embarrassed as you suggest,I
just don't like to open my personal mail and have the read the shit
people like you have to write.
Dave
Cormac McManamon
On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Dave & Tina wrote:
Nathan Szabo
you personally emailed him. Besides, who are you to judge people like that on a
bleepin newsgroup?
Cormac McManamon
her some slack at this time (instead of casting aspersions about why she
may be taking time off work without really knowing the full picture)?
Furthermore, you ask me who I am to judge this fella Dave? Hell, I
received three very insulting messages from this guy. I think that I have
every right to judge him.
I know full well that he is entitled to reply to what I have to say, but
am I not entitled to reply in my own defence, too? What does the bible
say, "Judge not lest ye be judged?" (And, no, I'm not some kind of
religious nut.) I tried to put this in perspective. I then received some
nasty e-mail in response, and merely decided to defend myself.
I'm sorry that I inadvertently replied to him personally when I should
have just replied to the newsgroup. It was a posting mistake. I am not
sorry for having replied, however. Anonymity is one thing. Drivel,
innuendo, rumour and trash (DIRT) is completely another. Let's do
everyone a favour, fellas, and put this one to rest. It's getting
exceedingly childish. Let's get out of the sandbox and leave Lynn Burry
alone, shall we?
Cormac
Dave & Tina
Dave
Nathan Szabo
Dave & Tina wrote:
> A moment of silence for the death of free speech.
> Dave
well said
Susan Gullage
Thomas Clancy
: I dont find him insulting and a bore. I applaud him for telling you to f-off when
: you personally emailed him. Besides, who are you to judge people like that on a
: bleepin newsgroup?
Nathan, that's why you "email". I think Cormac has behaved most
properly. I see nothing in any of his posts to justify Dave's
actions/reaction. The world would be a far better place if people
gathered the facts instead of passing about innuendo and generating
rumors. I'm beginning to believe that everyone should have to
undergo some sort of sensitivity training when being handed an
internet account. Far too many think that being faceless gives them
license to say what they wish without impunity.
Thomas
Nathan Szabo
the two were having a discussion on the newsgroup. Maybe read the whole thread through
before replying next time.
Dave & Tina
to me by two different individuals at Christmas time when the alledged
lawsuit took place or was closed.Again I am sorry.
Dave
Thomas Clancy
: Thomas, Dave was mad at Cormac for "personally" emailing him, and wasting his time, when
: the two were having a discussion on the newsgroup. Maybe read the whole thread through
: before replying next time.
There you go making assumptions: I have read the entire thread. I see
nothing wrong with taking something to email, more ppl should do just
that. Like, for instance, your response, and my followup: both waste
more peoples time than had we emailed each other. It's always best to
keep your laundry to email.
Regards,
Thomas
Damian Penny
Dave & Tina <dave...@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote:
> A moment of silence for the death of free speech.
> Dave
>
I hate to drag myself into this, but what does this have to do with free
speech? Is anyone keeping you from posting your opinion? Having had people
respond to my postings through e-mail, I'd say I'm with Tom and Cormac on this
one - IMHO by posting to a newsgroup, with your e-mail address for all to see,
you're inviting responses to your e-mail account. Certainly, Dave, there's no
excuse for the tone of your postings.
Damian P.
"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." - Dennis Miller
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Paul David Fardy
> Thomas, Dave was mad at Cormac for "personally" emailing him, and
> wasting his time, when the two were having a discussion on the
> newsgroup. Maybe read the whole thread through before replying next
> time.
I'm confused. Was the guy who proclaimed the death of free speech
the same guy who told someone to f-off for expressing an opinion?
Nathan, I get the impression that you believe that someone is not
supposed to respond to postings via e-mail. Where did you get
that impression? This is Usenet: by posting here, one invites
comment. You can chose to ignore comments sent via e-mail--I
sometimes do. But don't be surprised or offended because you
receive a response via mail. By posting to the news, you've
invited it. That's not a rule, that's simply a fact.
One can, of course, be offended by the content of the message
and one might even conclude the sender to be a coward for not
posting to the group. That doesn't appear, to me, to be the
case here.
Paul Fardy (reader of Usenet news)
jackman
an information newsgroup and not a method to keep an ongoing dispute between
people out in public.
This is getting to be more and more like a talkshow than a newsgroup.
Take the personal issues somewhere else, PLEASE!!!!!
Paul David Fardy <p...@morgan.ucs.mun.ca> wrote in message
news:7esu8o$9nj$1...@coranto.ucs.mun.ca...
Blair C. Morris
prepared to get it back.
If you post your e-mail address some people may reply directly either by
accident or otherwise.
Nathan Szabo
Paul David Fardy wrote:
> Nathan, I get the impression that you believe that someone is not
> supposed to respond to postings via e-mail.
Paul, I'm not talking for everybody, I'm talking about Dave's case. You
can clearly see from Dave's response that he does not enjoy personal
emails, and I was supporting his opinion.
> Where did you get that impression?
That impression is my opinion, which I am entitled to, and which I
expressed.
>But don't be surprised or offended because you
>receive a response via mail.
I dont know if you wrote this in the right context, but I never received a
response.
Paul David Fardy
>> Nathan, I get the impression that you believe that someone is not
>> supposed to respond to postings via e-mail.
Nathan Szabo <sz...@roadrunner.nf.net> writes:
>Paul, I'm not talking for everybody, I'm talking about Dave's case. You
>can clearly see from Dave's response that he does not enjoy personal
>emails, and I was supporting his opinion.
I don't mean to stop you from trying to change Usenet, but I doubt
you'll succeed. One can wish that people won't send e-mail--some
people will respect that; one can demand that people don't send
e-mail--I won't respect that; and one can whine and complain
about it--I won't respect that either. You're free to wish, demand,
and whine all you want, but it's not going change the reality that
when you stick your head out here, you can become a target.
Paul David Fardy wrote:
>> Where did you get that impression?
Nathan Szabo <sz...@roadrunner.nf.net> writes:
> That impression is my opinion, which I am entitled to, and which
> I expressed.
Of course, you're entitled to the opinion and you're entitled to
express it. But recognise that it's one opinion and, from my
experience, it's a minority opinion.
From "Rules for posting to Usenet" posted regularly to news.answers:
> It is never a good idea to carry on "meta-discussions" about
> whether a given discussion is appropriate -- such traffic
> mushrooms until nobody can find articles that belong. If you are
> unhappy with what some user said, send him/her mail, don't post it.
Many readers will feel that this message (my message) isn't about
Lynn Burry, isn't of general interest to the readers of the group,
and should have been sent via e-mail rather than being posted to the
newsgroup. I believe that once a thread is born, we should simply let
it live out its (hopefully) brief life and die naturally.
Also from "Rules for posting to Usenet" posted regularly to news.answers:
> For instance, messages offering thanks, jibes, or congratulations
> will only need to be seen by the interested parties -- send these
> by mail rather than posting them.
Which shows that it's recommended, as well as common, practice.
Paul David Fardy wrote:
>> But don't be surprised or offended because
>> you receive a response via mail.
Nathan Szabo <sz...@roadrunner.nf.net> writes:
> I dont know if you wrote this in the right context, but I never
> received a response.
Maybe I should have phrased that differently.
When one posts to Usenet, one must expect response. Sometimes
that response will come via e-mail. One should not be surprised
or offended by this. That's just the way it is. Feel free to
express contempt. Usenet will happily accept your expression,
for it thrives on free expression, but it will probably ignore
your contempt.
The attitude was, I think, summed up by someone earlier in this
thread... let me look... here it i--huh?! Okay, I'm confused
again:
Dave & Tina <dave...@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote:
> If you can't handle the heat or the comments [...] leave us alone.
Isn't that the same poster again? Who's against what? I can't
figure it out.
Paul Fardy
--
"If you don't like the weather, move." -- Al Sleet (aka George Carlin)
Nathan Szabo
will stop.
Paul David Fardy wrote:
>
Doug Bailey
resolved in favour of a bickering session. The rules seem
straight-forward...if you post people can and do read it, and can and may
reply either by posting or by e-mailing you personally.
Time to let it go.
mel...@nfld.com
Garbage man and hear his tragic story of love, betrayal and unsorted
recyclables....
And we've got FBI evidence that Lynn Burry was eaten by seals off the
south coast. See the heartwrenching tape of of Lynn's microphone
scattered on the ocean floor...
*********************
But seriously, who cares?
Patrick Sullivan
: Tonight on the Toni-Marie Show! We're going to meet Lynn Burry's
Cool. Hey, how can we get this show out this way here on Vancouver Island?
Robert Lewis
Still mentally scarred by the abuse.
Rob