Cheat House

[Jesper Sahu]

Theproblem always occurs when activating the trainer, because if you play without the trainer the game continues normally. Now I played a long game without activating the trainer and it never crashed. I tried to reactivate a cheat, namely the instant wipe, and after 10 minutes it crashed. If, as you say, the problem is the game, it would crash even without the trainer, so the problem is the trainer itself which, when some cheat is activated, crashes the game after about 10/15 minutes.

Same here with the crashes. Used it a couple of days ago. No issues at all. Played the last day an most of today with no issues. As soon as I boot the trainer a few minutes ago insta crash, Same no matter if I boot the game first or boot the game with the trainer.

It works pretty stable if you hook the trainer and run around in one location for short periods. However, sometimes when clicking on objects, or transitioning between zones it will cause a crash if the trainer is still hooked even with nothing enabled.

I also played the game without any mods enabled and just clicked on (play) on the Wemod app without any mods on/enabled and the same freeze happened again after around 30 min, then played the game for 2 hours but this time started the game from steam without opening Wemod app or enabling any mods from it and the game ran fine without any problem

When Harry is a first year, Professor McGonagall recommends Harry as seeker and gifts him a Nimbus 2000, breaking the house rule according to which first years are not allowed to have brooms. The idea is probably that flying (and especially Quidditch) is too dangerous, and first years shouldn't dodge Bludgers or fly unsupervised. It's allowed to fly under the supervision of Madame Hooch, on school brooms. Harry was good, but my impression was that he wasn't as good as Quidditch prodigy Viktor Krum, to justify making him the youngest seeker in 100 years.

When Harry enters Hogwarts, Slytherin house is on a winning streak for both the House and the Quidditch Cup. The Seeker is extremely important to the outcome of the game, so could it be that Minerva was desperate enough to change tactics and use a young, lightweight seeker, giving an unfair advantage to the Gryffindor team?

In sixth year Harry uses a spell of unknown origin that almost kills another student, refusing to tell the source that spell come from and if there's more such things he learned. Yet McGanagall has no intention to suspend Harry from the team.

Same with the House Cup. In first year Dumbledore awards exactly enough points so Gryffindor would win. How that's fair? It's not as if other houses were given the chance to fight Voldemort or had the cloak of invisibility.

Ten points is really a rather small reward. While one could make a good argument for awarding lots of points based on saving the world, it seems clear that the precise number of points was calculated to put Gryffindor in first place.

It is worth noting that in all cases in which points were awarded, McGonagall and Dumbledore had very good reason to award points. It is also true, however, that they specifically seized upon these ambiguous instances to put Gryffindor ahead of Slytherin.

Firstly, a nitpick. Gryffindor didn't win the Quidditch Cup that year. It's not entirely clear but from the following quotes I'd infer that Slytherin won it alongside the House Cup (before Dumbledore awarded Gryffindor the extra points, that is).

"The points are all in and Slytherin won, of course - you missed the last Quidditch match, we were steamrollered by Ravenclaw without you - but the food'll be good."

(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 17, The Man With Two Faces)

"Gryffindor haven't won for seven years now. OK, so we've had the worst luck in the world - injuries - then the tournament being called off last year..."

(Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 8, Flight of the Fat Lady)

Now it seems that Quidditch scores contribute to the totals for the House Cup. Harry expresses dismay that the points he loses for being out of bed wipe out those he won for Quidditch. So having a good Quidditch team certainly helps with regards to winning the House Cup. But, when it comes to the Quidditch scoring system itself, remember that this is basically a sport which is invented in such a way as to make Harry a hero. Even the best of Chasers is unlikely to win their team more than 50 or 60 points in a game. The Seeker gets 150 points and almost always wins the match just by pulling off their signature move. So, in that sense, the entire House Cup wasn't fair to begin with because it gives a disproportionate reward to Quidditch Seekers over and above everyone else. This was true of all the houses.

"Are you serious, Professor?"

"Absolutely," said Professor McGonagall crisply. "The boy's a natural. I've never seen anything like it...He caught that thing in his hand after a fifty-foot dive...Didn't even scratch himself. Charlie Weasley couldn't have done it."

(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 9, The Midnight Duel)

True, she does bend the rule about first years not having brooms. But that rule is surely there to ensure the safety of first-years and make sure that they don't cause a danger to themselves or others until they have completed their Flying Lessons. Harry has obviously just demonstrated that he is not only able to fly competently but that he's one of the most talented flyers that Hogwarts has ever seen. There's no reason to prevent him joining the Gryffindor team. As is the case with Muggle sports, if you're good enough then you're old enough.

Where McGonagall arguably is culpable is in buying Harry a top-of-the-range Nimbus 2000. This was not strictly necessary. However, in a competition where a player's father can buy the entire team top broomsticks (as Lucius Malfoy does a year later), I'd argue that it's not really a big deal. Professor Flitwick was the Head of another house and he didn't make any objections.

"Potter's been sent a broomstick, Professor," said Malfoy quickly.

"Yes, yes, that's right," said Professor Flitwick, beaming at Harry. "Professor McGonagall told me all about the special circumstances, Potter. And what model is it?"

(Philosopher's Stone, Chapter 10, Hallowe'en)

Indeed, if Snape takes points away from Gryffindor for no reason, McGonagall if anything seems curiously unwilling to reward her own House. Consider how she gives out a mere ten points to Ron and Harry - two first years who defeat a fully-grown mountain troll without any help from teachers or other students, saving Hermione's life in the process.

This is surely a very measly reward for such a huge achievement! My conclusion would be that inter-House bias certainly does play a role in the rewarding and docking of points. Therefore, what happened at the end of The Philosopher's Stone doesn't seem to be too far out of the ordinary.

It is unfair, true. It hardly seems just for the diligent Slytherin students who'd been receiving five or ten points for their efforts on homework during the entire school year. Their efforts are overridden entirely by the points Harry, Ron, Hermione and Neville get right at the end of the year. Dumbledore obviously awarded the points in such a way that Gryffindor would very narrowly win. This is hardly fair.

Yet we shouldn't underestimate the trio's achievement either. They thwart the return of Lord Voldemort into eternal life. This is something that any grown-up wizard would be immensely proud of. Dumbledore is hardly overreacting by giving them the House Cup. If anything, they deserve a lot more. I wouldn't say Dumbledore cheated. I'd say he manipulated the system to justly reward the extraordinary (historic, really) efforts of some young Gryffindors by giving them something he knew they'd appreciate - recognition by the rest of the school and the end-of-year prize. As Headmaster, he was well within his rights to give them this.

As a bit of a bonus to what the other answers contain, remember that at this point of the tale, it is necessary to establish that there no friendship between Snape and the rest of the Hogwarts staff, and especially between Dumbledore and Snape. There is a campaign of misdirection going on against He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, and this includes misdirecting those who are loyal to him.

Granted, Snape probably would not have gotten on with McGonagall, and his relationship with Dumbledore would never have been close, but to keep up the charade they also work to ensure that during time when this ruse needs most earnestly to be effective, they are throwing little digs at Snape's prestige and dignity. All of the Death Eaters who are still loose (Lucius Malfoy et al.) see and hear of this and this helps Snape gain their trust (in most cases; Bellatrix was an exception).

Later this pays off. When Voldemort uses his Legilimency to dip into Snape's head, he sees Snape's hatred for Harry (which is mostly genuine), as well as memories of the slights against him by those to whom Harry is close. Seeing only dislike for his own enemies, Voldemort digs no deeper and never learns that he is being fooled by the biggest Occlumens ever.

I got fired from my job, okay? I was told that after the surgery, my breasts would lose their nipples and areola, and that the scars from the shingles that got worse during the cancer treatment would never go away.

I remember my own end.

A medical bed was placed in the Japanese-style room of my parents' house, and I tumbled down from it when I tried to rise, but unable to get up, I looked out the window at the garden and thought to myself.

This pattern is like that. It's the kind of reincarnation or transmigration that you see in web novels and the like.

I mean, I never had a lucid dream before. The scent and the feel was as real as it gets. And it was not a bright place, like a sacred forest from some religion, but this dense feeling it gave off was also realistic.

3a8082e126