The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning <
ze...@umbrellix.net> wrote:
> On 10/24/23 01:11, VanguardLH wrote:
>> The Bjornsdottirs - Lightning <
ze...@umbrellix.net> wrote:
>>
>>> --
>>> Lightning Bjornsson
>>> When replying off-Usenet, remember to reply to
>>>
drago...@chatspeed.net. My "email address" is set the way it is due
>>> to Eternal September's nymshifting laws, which forbid using different
>>> emails on a single account.
>>
>> Please reduce your sig to 4 lines, or less, per Usenetiquette. Really
>> don't need to explain your e-mail address, so eliminate berating ES.
>> 2 lines would cover your sig, like:
>>
>> Lightning Bjornsson
>> When replying via email, use
drago...@chatspeed.net.
>>
>> Since the From header already gives your name, and the 1st sig line
>> duplicates that info, just use the 2nd line for a 1-line sig.
> Thirty years ago, in the month ES is named after, you paid by the byte.
> Now it's many gigabytes or more before things get expensive, even on
> high cost links.
>
> If you don't like long sigs, you can filter them yourself, or you can
> killfile their known users.
It's not about how much bandwidth you get now versus then. It's about
being polite with short sigs. Most times sigs are off-topic fluff,
unnecessary, and the longer they are the more off-topic and fluff they
become. For you, you're on a campaign to slur ES with trivia no one
else cares about.
You post here in plain text, because it is a text newsgroup. You comply
with netiquette. Why not on the sig, too?
By the way, I do filter out sigs. My client will hide anything after,
and including, the sig delimiter line. That's because sigs are rarely
on-topic to the message or newsgroup. Hiding something does not alter
it is there. If I don't want to see traffic passing my house on the
street, I could also draw the drapes. The traffic is still there.
Occasionally I look at the raw source of a message, like to review the
headers. That's when I saw your oversized sig.
4-line, or less, sig blocks have been netiquette for longer than you, or
even I, have been in Usenet. No, you don't have to comply. It's
netiquette, not a limitation of NNTP. It is a de facto standard. I
learned of it when I started Usenet back some 40 years ago. Doing
otherwise is considered rude. Be careful the reputation you engender.
Look at the reputation Good Guy has engendered with his posting of
HTML-formatted messages in text-only newsgroups. He is deliberately
rude, and, yep, many filter him out. You don't want to go that route.
From your reply, looks like you'll continue to do it your way, because
there's nothing to stop you. Okay, get ready to be ignored. Some folks
will announce when they plonk you. Many don't since the announcement is
a vacuous threat. They just plonk without notice. Hard enough these
days to find an audience in Usenet without having regulars ignore you.