.) soc.* presents a rather different picture. The first soc.* proposal listed in the May 11 post, for soc.culture.makedonija, had not only a third-party votetaker but also a third

. >soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya and soc.culture.makedonija were >simultaneous, and probably made it as clear as anything could >that Something Must Be Done; simultaneously

> >soc.culture.kashmir > >soc.culture.tibet > >soc.culture.sindhi > > > >? > > > >No? > > > >Then I submit that inappropriate

sanskrit, soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya, to name a few) which were discussed and "campaigned" for/against during their RFD phases on relevant mailing lists, and to

In article <37849ff1.178353809@faatcrl.tc.faa.gov>, Charlie <greyman@erols.com> wrote:

In the recent REC. COLLECTING .STAMPS, I found it impossible to vote. That is because we dont have a

It would appear that rec.toys.transformers.* seems to suffer from dread insane author disease. It

Here is a list of about 2100 RFDs which have been posted from 1992 to the present. This list is taken

Here is a list of about 2100 RFDs which have been posted from 1992 to the present. This list is taken

See >soc.religion.mormon >******************* >[Other than the prohibition of direct quotes from the LDS temple ceremony, >which I'll talk about in the conclusion

be under soc.religion.christian. Be it >>roman-catholic, morman, or satanism. They're all xian sects so they >>should probably be in the same heirarchy. >

[posted and e-mailed] In article <3368f72d.812223@newshost.cyberramp.net>, mcecil@cyberramp.net

like : soc.culture.kashmir, soc.culture.jammu-kashmir, soc.culture.sindh, : soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya, soc.culture.tibet, etc. Setting up a Usenet newsgroup for a certain

FIRST CALL FOR VOTES (of 2) unmoderated group soc.culture.sindhi Newsgroups line: soc.culture.sindhi

have >soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya, soc.culture.macedonia, and >rec.music.white-power - all groups that had demonstrated interest and were >voted down because

While you all debate the David Lawrence's decision to pass SCI.JK, I see an unfortunate tendency

Or the soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya flame war, or the whole flame war about Macedonia, etc etc etc... (Sigh) They just don't make dweebs like they used to anymore... --Dave -

At 9:18 PM 8/20/95, Richard Evans wrote: >WE WISH! Hopefully some votes will come from the afdg

.sf-lovers split, the soc.culture.macedonia issue, the soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya proposal and many other nightmares from the past :-). David Seal dseal@armltd.co.uk

REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) moderated group soc.religion.scientology Newsgroup: soc.religion.

during the soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya (did I manage to spell that in a way remotely acceptable?), some of the debate became centered on the validity of ahmadiyya-ism and especially

Has anyone determined what has happened to Ron Dippold yet? -- ////// // // ////// // //////

After all of the discussions regarding comp.bbs.powerbbs, I think it is time to rethink and clarify

rdippold@qualcomm.com (Ron "Asbestos" Dippold) said > FIRST CALL FOR VOTES (of 2) >

Yo, Lance! This forum has been deafeningly silent of late in respect to the RFD on the proposed news

- >soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya? Jay, I am somebody who has an occasional interest in Ahmadiyyah (notice the proper spellings :) issues, and I think that comp.unix.sources

hinting at Soc.Religion.Islam.Ahmadiyya proposal ? It has been a year, not sure if it the proposal is going to be proposed again or not? At least this time, we can request them to make

to preempt soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya. The Muslims did not seem to feel so, and it was neither presented to the Muslim as such, nor presented by the Muslims as such. If the case had

of the soc.religion.islam.ahmadiyya is done. Whatever is later. Matthias ----- Matthias Neeracher neeri@iis.ethz.ch "I'm set free to find a new illusion" -- Velvet

peter@nmti.com (Peter da Silva) writes: The amount of traffic doesn't change the relative costs