'csulaima@gnu' acct [Re:: Basalat Ali Raja: Stalker
A. M. Mughal
<kaa...@sun14.vlsi.uwaterloo.ca] wrote:
]]] Asalaam Alaikum,
]]]
]]] Brothers and Sisters.
]]]
]]] Basalat Ali Raja wrote:
]]]
]]] ]I just did a last on Sr. Cynthia's account. At GNU, disk space is
]]] ]fairly limited, so we do not keep extensive logs at all, but just
]]] ]yesterday and today we have the following:
]]
]]] ]csulaima ttyp3 vm1.cis.pitt.edu Sun May 8 19:47 - 20:03 (00:15)
]]] ]csulaima ttypa alpha.smi.med.pi Sat May 7 22:14 - 22:22 (00:08)
]]
]]] Am I the only one wondering why this guy has been fingering Sr Cynthia's
]]] account so much? Is he some kind of pervert? Can't you find another outlet
]]] for your curiosity about the lives of your muslim sisters? Don't you have
]]] anything better to do with your time than being a peeping tom?
]]
]]
]]
]] Before you go on to the never never land.
]]
]] If I may point out, there was a question raised on SRI about why
]] the logins into a moderator's account are from *.pitt.edu domain.
]]
]] Mr.Raja, on the same site as 'csulaima@gnu' checked out validity
]] of the concern raised. Surprisingly, his check on the account has
]] raised even more questions.
]]
]] In response, an ex-moderator has admitted to login-in to her account
]] to 'help' csulaima. In general, no one would have known who from
]] *.pitt.edu domain is signing on. Mr.Ahmad Hashem has been quick to
]] incrimminate himself.
]]
]] What you very kindly forgot was the beginning of his posting which
]] clearly said.
]]
]]"With regard to the inquiry by Sr. Iraj:
]]
]]I just did a last on Sr. Cynthia's account. At GNU, disk space is
]]fairly limited, so we do not keep extensive logs at all, but just
]]yesterday and today we have the following:"
]]
]]
]] It is obvious, you are trying to divert attention from the real issue.
]] The real issue is:
]]
]] Mr.Ahmad Hahem (who is not a moderator) has been using the account
]] 'csulaima@gnu' He has admitted to doing so as well.
]]
]]
]]
]] A.Mughal
]] [Standard Disclaimer] Flames:/dev/null
]]
]
]
]The story is not as simple as what this gentelman is saying. I have
]heard this:
] ex-moderators such as Ahmad Hashem, Asim Mughal, Ali Basalat
] ... have installed a program on their account to see who is
] fingering their account. Just recently, this friend informed me
Who is this 'friend'?
] that Asim Mughal installed a program (possibly written by himself)
] on his account and fingers the account of at least two people
] every 5 minutes, Sister Cynthia, and Br. Ahmad Hashem. He was
] ^^^
] monitoring these accounts for at least three days.
How does this change the fact that Mr.Hashem had very frequent
access to SRI moderator csulaima@gnu account ?
Is this an explanation of sharing of csulaima@gnu account with
a non-moderator ?
Do you approve of such sharing of moderator's account ?
A.Mughal
[Standard Disclaimer] Flames:/dev/null
Ahmad Hashem
A. M. Mughal <mug...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
>
> How does this change the fact that Mr.Hashem had very frequent
> access to SRI moderator csulaima@gnu account ?
>
> Is this an explanation of sharing of csulaima@gnu account with
> a non-moderator ?
>
> Do you approve of such sharing of moderator's account ?
Asim Mughal, allow me to repeat what I have said before, that Sr.
Cindy Sulaiman needed help with the software package that automates
the work for moderators. Asim Mughal and Basalat Raja were not only
refusing to help, but, in effect, putting every obstacle they can
think of in her way. Cindy asked me for help, telling me, to quote,
"everyone has deserted me." I complied. Allow me to assure you that
if she asks for my help again, I will do just that. Allow me also to
say that if this is something to be ashamed of, then, by all means,
flame me for being "shameless."
The claim that I have "frequent access" to her account is baseless.
The claim that I "share" her account is baseless. If baseless charges
cost a dime a dozen then a lot of people would be bankrupt by now I
guess. Interesting how charges are being thrown left and right by
certain people now at a time when the SRI readers are actively working
on regaining the newsgroup for their own.
Finally, please excuse me, I really have no interest or time to
respond to your accusations. Further, I have enough respect to the
time of the readers of this newsgroup to refuse to carry on such
trivial discussion about Asim's and Basalat's fantasies. As far as I
am concerned this is all I will say on this issue. If you still don't
get it, there is not much I can do, really.
Sincerely,
Ahmad Hashem
--
Ahmad Hashem, MD | B50A Lothrop Hall | Email a...@smi.med.pitt.edu
Fellow, Medical Informatics | Dept of Medicine | Phone (412) 648-3127
University of Pittsburgh | Pgh, PA 15261 | Fax (412) 648-3126
Basalat Ali Raja
Ahmad Hashem <a...@alpha.smi.med.pitt.edu> wrote:
>Finally, please excuse me, I really have no interest or time to
>respond to your accusations. Further, I have enough respect to the
>time of the readers of this newsgroup to refuse to carry on such
>trivial discussion about Asim's and Basalat's fantasies. As far as I
>am concerned this is all I will say on this issue. If you still don't
>get it, there is not much I can do, really.
I would request one clarification before you withdraw. When you say
that you are not going to comment any more on the issue, I presume
that you exclude your usage of Cynthia Sulaiman's account and your
pseudonyms of Jihad Khattab and/or Tareq Masoud?
To the contrary, over the past few weeks, you have commented
extensively on all aspects of the situation, up to and including
maligning my character.
Salman [Ustad] Azhar
>In article <2qs06j$s...@usenet.srv.cis.pitt.edu>,
>Ahmad Hashem <a...@alpha.smi.med.pitt.edu> wrote:
>>Finally, please excuse me, I really have no interest or time to
>>respond to your accusations. Further, I have enough respect to the
>>time of the readers of this newsgroup to refuse to carry on such
>>trivial discussion about Asim's and Basalat's fantasies. As far as I
>>am concerned this is all I will say on this issue. If you still don't
>>get it, there is not much I can do, really.
>I would request one clarification before you withdraw. When you say
>that you are not going to comment any more on the issue, I presume
>that you exclude your usage of Cynthia Sulaiman's account and your
>pseudonyms of Jihad Khattab and/or Tareq Masoud?
Actually, Tarek Masoud and Ahmed Hashem are definitely two
different people, and I feel that Mr. Raja should withdraw his
accusation regarding their identity, immediately.
On the other hand, I am not sure about Jihad Khataab and Ahmed
Hashem because no disinterested party that has met me has met Jihad.
Jihad seemingly shares the same profession and his account is based
an hour or two drive away from Ahmed Hashem. Nevertheless, all the
evidence that one thinks of is circumstantial. Will someone real out
there vouch for the fact that they have met both Jihad and Ahmed and
that are different people. Anyone who is a disinterested party.
Speaking of all this, has anyone heard from Anthony Lest, or
is it assumed that Nabeel Rana was Anthony Lest or vice versa.
DS[Q]A
--
D. Salman Azhar CS Dept Duveristy Unike az...@cricket.cs.duke.edu
"Innate charlatanism coupled with general dogmatic ignorance
has accentuated the intellectual, moral, and spiritual degradation of
Ahmad Hashem
Words cannot tell you how much you insulted me by your posting about
me being Jihad (and mentioning the Rana-Lest connection in that
context). When I saw Asim's accusations I laughed. Really. I
thought it was a nice joke. But when I saw yours, I was truly hurt.
Perhaps deep inside I still cared about the opinions of the man who
once asked me to be one of two witesses for his wedding.
Salman Azhar, I am not a street fighter, and never was. I am not
happy to be part of this ugly game. I said on SRI today that if my
presence didn't help then let's hope my absence will. I unsubscribed
to SRI today, and I am now unsubscribing to ARI.
Assalamu alaikum,
A. M. Mughal
Salman [Ustad] Azhar <az...@duke.cs.duke.edu> wrote:
> Speaking of all this, has anyone heard from Anthony Lest, or
>is it assumed that Nabeel Rana was Anthony Lest or vice versa.
Are you hinting at Soc.Religion.Islam.Ahmadiyya proposal ?
It has been a year, not sure if it the proposal is going to be
proposed again or not? At least this time, we can request them
to make Anthony Lest become a member of UVV before asking to be
the vote-taker. One can only guess that is at all possible?
Btw, what happened to 'review' of results promised by Chip Rosenthal?
> DS[Q]A