Re: Welcome to misc.legal

[King John I of AUK]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:gs3dmh$nun$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> Michael Davis wrote:
> > Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
> >
> >> Michael Davis wrote:
> >>> Bob Larter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Michael Davis wrote:
> >>>>> Dead Kitten wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Michael Davis wrote:
> >>>>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Fuck off, Mop Jockey.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> so which retard are you? PJR?
> >>>>>> Lionel.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Note that he has a raging hardon for OMH.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> yeah, that's why i poast here so fuckin' often. <LAUGH>
> >>>>
> >>>> Wow, you really are stupid.
> >>>>
> >>> yep. i'm really really really really really really stupid.
> >>>
> >>> you are so smart. you prove it every time you try to be some kind
> >>> of tough guy on the usernets boasting of beating up retards.
> >>
> >> He was talking about the post you responded to.
> >>
> >> Dead Kitten answered your question about the identity of Bob
Larter:
> >> "Lionel. Note that he has a raging hardon for OMH."
> >>
> >> And you replied: "yeah, that's why i poast here so fuckin' often.
> >> <LAUGH>"
> >>
> >> More like misunderstanding the attribution than stupid, IMO, but
you
> >> did miss the point.
> >>
> > no i didn't miss any point. i just don't give a fuck if there was a
> > point and some other losers do.
> >
> > i'm way fuckin over it.
>
> I understand that better than you might imagine. OTOH, I have a life
> with which I'm perfectly satisfied, so about the most I still feel
about
> the nonsense that went on is occasional, residual exasperation at
people
> who can't see their own double standard. That includes both sides--and
> even me--at times.
>
> Usenet was once full of promise. No more. Find something better. It's
> not hard to do.
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

You want all of us to "walk-off" Usenet, en masse ??
--
KHJ

p.s. Somebody would "cheat' and stick-around....and act Gay....

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

What are the chances of that?

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will
scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will
refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he
will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is
explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell

[King John I of AUK]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message

news:gs3gdn$31e$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...

About the same as one guy "shutting-up" Pinky, Deco, & Cannon !!

Miracles do happen......these are "Magical" times.....it's good to be
here to see this....Heck, without "them" everyone just might learn to
chat and be friends.......and live "Happily Ever After"......and ride
off into the Sunset !!
--
KHJ (Boy, this Moonshine is sure good)

p.s. How about a little "swig", pookie ??

[art_deco_...@yahoo.com]

On Apr 16, 1:23 am, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:
> In article <2o2tse.cjm.1...@news.alt.net>

>
>
>
>
>
> "atlas bugged" <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message

> >news:gs5b23$6cl$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> > > Meat Plow wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:43:17 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> > >> <ni...@databasix.com>wrote:
>
> > >>> Meat Plow wrote:
> > >>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:19:42 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> > >>>> <ni...@databasix.com>wrote:
>
> > >>>>> Rob Wolfe has never treated me ill, and I have no reason not to
> > >>>>> treat him in a friendly manner.
>
> > >>>> This takes me back to a day a year or so ago when this identical
> > >>>> sentence (substitute the name with a certain Tom's River NJ
> > >>>> resident) was directed towards a friendly warning from me. Too bad
> > >>>> said warning was never heeded.
>
> > >>>> :(
>
> > >>> Too bad no one ever warned me about you.
>
> > >> Yeah I guess I really have done you a lot of harm haven't I.
> > >> I've come into your home, cast my writings onto your computer screen
> > >> while forcibly holding your head towards it and forcing your eyes open
> > >> while screaming READ MY POSTS relentlessly in your ear all the while
> > >> holding you at gunpoint threatening to shoot if you didn't read my
> > >> posts.
>
> > >> Yep I'm the bad one that needed to carry a warning sign that said DO
> > >> NOT READ around.
>
> > >> OR, it could be that nobody warned you because it wasn't needed.
> > >> That does make more sense.
>
> > >> .....heh
>
> > > Very few people actually buy the bs that "it's only words on the screen."
> > > Go ask a real person who lives in the real world what s/he thinks. You're
> > > so immersed in auk culture that you've lost all compassion for your fellow
> > > humans. I'm not an anthropologist by any stretch of the imagination, but
> > > even I recognize primitive tribal behavior when I see it.
>
> > > How does it feel to be a knuckle-dragger?
>
> > > Besides which, if words on the screen really have no meaning, then I'd not
> > > have objected to Novins' ill words on the screen. Moreover, he and I would
> > > still be friends, and I would not even be a party to this ridiculous
> > > lawsuit.
>
> > If it's so ridiculous, how come you're desperately hiding from service, you
> > preposterous fraud?
>
> Be quiet, kook.

SHUT THE FUCK UP, DECO !!
--
Colorado Carl

[art_deco_...@yahoo.com]

On Apr 16, 8:53 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> In article <4027887.OkPlAI5...@127.0.0.1>, r...@127.0.0.1 says...
>
> > and you're positive that those people weren't just retaliating for attacks
> > from AUKtards?
>
> John C. was already in auk when I first read their posts. He's been
> humping my every post for three years, although I largely ignore
> him. All for being friends with Art Deco and some mild flaming in a
> couple of threads three years ago. He can dish it out, but he can't
> take it.

You're not my friend, you filthy skank!
FOAD

> > when i retaliated, i had copies of the bogus complaints that 2 of the tards
> > had made to my employer in hand and yet i was told that i was a kook for
> > making RL contact and the rest of the AUKtards were (probably still...) in
> > denial about initiating RL.
>
> > john c has gone RL?  just because he somehow knows that osterwald likes to
> > gobble knobs?  LOL
>
> You must be ignoring him, as most people do, most of the time.
> don't you think?
>
The Honest One seems to have a Luxury Suit in you head now!

> > the fact remains that cujo is a kooky little edmo faanboi.
>
> I see your point.
>
He's almost as Bad as I am!

> > yeah, plausible denialbility doesn't really prove anything.  i have little
> > doubt that cujo would use his tech skills to get even with someone online
> > and be savvy enough to not get caught or leave any evidence except red
> > herrings.  he isn't stupid.  just what he does is stupid and why he does it
> > is pathetic.
>
> You are correct, sir.

Of course he's right about that ass hole!
--
Art Deco (TINAD)

[art_deco_...@yahoo.com]

On Apr 16, 9:47 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> In article <jfefu45hl2balpna0ujf4v7nnootqne...@4ax.com>,
> montavi...@spam.invalid says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> > >On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:51:23 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> > >Montavious Python <montavi...@spam.invalid> got double secret
> > >probation for writing:
>
> > >>Bob Larter <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>Aratzio wrote:
> > >>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT), in the land of
> > >>>> alt.usenet.kooks, HoofPrints <hoofpri...@equsphoto.net> got double
> > >>>> secret probation for writing:
>
> > >>>>> Thank you Google Alerts.
> > >>>>> Kali stop mentioning my name especially when the events that
> > >>>>> transpired are recorded in SMDH archives on you and your kiss-ups.
> > >>>>> Lynne
>
> > >>>> Lynne Lyons Lynne Lyons Lynne Lyons Lynne Lyons
> > >>>> Hoofprints Hoofprints Hoofprints Hoofprints
>
> > >>>> I do so enjoy google alerts.
>
> > >>>So, if I say Lynne Lyons or Hoofprints, Goofy will get an alert?
>
> > >>Probably.  But not so much if you say "Lynn3 Ly0ns" or "G00fprints" or
> > >>"G00fy".
>
> > >I would think then that the typing of Lynne Lyons would be mandatory.
>
> > I agree with this post.  In fact, anyone who responds further in this
> > subthread -without- typing out "Lynne Lyons" ought to be nominated for
> > Coward of the Month.
>
> > I mean, hey, it's ten frickin letters.  
>
> > Watch me do it:  Lynne Lyons.  Now was that so hard???
>
> Bad boys, bad boys... please leave Goofy in retirement peace.
> --
> Kimberly Kay Barnard

STFU Kali
--
Art Deco

[Sgt.P...@hotmail.com]

On Apr 16, 4:13 pm, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> In alt.usenet.kooks on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:19:53 -0600, Dead Kitten
>
> <ic9bnj...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> > And I can confirm that Altopia does in fact ignore bogus complaints.
> > They take legitimate complaints seriously, but bogus ones fall on deaf
> > ears.
>
> Absolutely! However, complaints aren't necessarily bogus just because
> you think they are.
> --
> PJR

How do you keep the complaints seperated, before you mail them off,
NetKKKop Ross?
--
Sgt.

[Sgt.P...@hotmail.com]

On Apr 16, 8:12 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
>
> And yes, all the gerbils are in my ass.
> --
> Kimberly Kay Barnard

You're SICK...just like that Sunday School teacher in California!
--
Sgt.

[Bob Larter]

Lame sockpuppet, HandJob.

PS: And a big "Hello" to Lynne Lyons, who's watching
this from Google ALerts!

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

[King John I of AUK]

<art_deco_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a4f8050f-e964-4310...@v19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Atta-Boi Carl !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

<art_deco_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:de3c819c-b4a2-4224...@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

~~~~~~~~~~~~

IAWTP !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

<Sgt.P...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:70e492b5-ff05-45fb...@g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com...

~~~~~~~~

Yeah, Peter "Eater" Ross, how do you, Centurytel wants to know !
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49e84d4e$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> Sgt.P...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 4:13 pm, Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
> >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:19:53 -0600, Dead Kitten
> >>
> >> <ic9bnj...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >>> And I can confirm that Altopia does in fact ignore bogus
complaints.
> >>> They take legitimate complaints seriously, but bogus ones fall on
deaf
> >>> ears.
> >> Absolutely! However, complaints aren't necessarily bogus just
because
> >> you think they are.
> >> --
> >> PJR
> >
> > How do you keep the complaints seperated, before you mail them off,
> > NetKKKop Ross?
> > --
> > Sgt.
>

> Lame sockpuppet, Honest John.
> --
> Lionel Lauer

I know, ain't he cute ??
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

<Sgt.P...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a15e3f21-0d59-434c...@z14g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

~~~~~~~~

I've been watching that on the news.....that is BAD !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:2o4h2h....@news.alt.net...
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:10:48 -0400, Russell Tavek
> <restavek...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >On 4/15/09 2:10 PM, in article 2o1tfh.o...@news.alt.net, "Meat
Plow"

> ><me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Yeah I guess I really have done you a lot of harm haven't I.
> >> I've come into your home, cast my writings onto your computer
screen
> >> while forcibly holding your head towards it and forcing your eyes
open
> >> while screaming READ MY POSTS relentlessly in your ear all the
while
> >> holding you at gunpoint threatening to shoot if you didn't read my
> >> posts.
> >>
> >> Yep I'm the bad one that needed to carry a warning sign that said
DO
> >> NOT READ around.
> >

> >You might want to tell your buddies Carl Osterwald and Peter J. Ross
about
> >that. They're the ones calling up CenturyTel's corporate
headquarters and
> >bombarding the WHOIS contacts with complaints in an effort to silence
a
> >poster who appears to be guilty of nothing more than unending fag
lames. But
> >of course, like all the AUK Sociopaths, you have difficulty holding
yourself
> >and your friends to the same standards you'd like everyone else to
follow.
>
> I don't hold anyone to anything, Fuckhead.

Yes you can, Fuckhead !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message

news:2o4ifd....@news.alt.net...
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:01:09 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"

> <ni...@databasix.com>wrote:
>
> >Meat Plow wrote:
> >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:43:17 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> >> <ni...@databasix.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Meat Plow wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:19:42 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> >>>> <ni...@databasix.com>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Rob Wolfe has never treated me ill, and I have no reason not to
> >>>>> treat him in a friendly manner.
> >>>>
> >>>> This takes me back to a day a year or so ago when this identical
> >>>> sentence (substitute the name with a certain Tom's River NJ
> >>>> resident) was directed towards a friendly warning from me. Too
bad
> >>>> said warning was never heeded.
> >>>>
> >>>> :(
> >>>
> >>> Too bad no one ever warned me about you.
> >>

> >> Yeah I guess I really have done you a lot of harm haven't I.
> >> I've come into your home, cast my writings onto your computer
screen
> >> while forcibly holding your head towards it and forcing your eyes
open
> >> while screaming READ MY POSTS relentlessly in your ear all the
while
> >> holding you at gunpoint threatening to shoot if you didn't read my
> >> posts.
> >>
> >> Yep I'm the bad one that needed to carry a warning sign that said
DO
> >> NOT READ around.
> >>

> >> OR, it could be that nobody warned you because it wasn't needed.
> >> That does make more sense.
> >>
> >>
> >> .....heh
> >
> >Very few people actually buy the bs that "it's only words on the
> >screen." Go ask a real person who lives in the real world what s/he
> >thinks. You're so immersed in auk culture that you've lost all
> >compassion for your fellow humans. I'm not an anthropologist by any
> >stretch of the imagination, but even I recognize primitive tribal
> >behavior when I see it.
> >
> >How does it feel to be a knuckle-dragger?
>

> I wouldn't know of course. But I can approximate the year I first used
> the term "knuckle-dragger" to try to insult someone. It was around
> 1997 and was one of my first flames.

>
> >Besides which, if words on the screen really have no meaning, then
I'd
> >not have objected to Novins' ill words on the screen. Moreover, he
and I
> >would still be friends, and I would not even be a party to this
> >ridiculous lawsuit.
>

> I was always careful what I said to people. I held just short of
> defamation unless calling you a cunt was defamation. I'm a very good
> judge of people on first impulse and I had your Benedict Arnold pegged
> as a dangerous sociopath and warned you and others to distance
> themselves.
>
> I agree this suit is ridiculous but as ridiculous as it may be it's
> still going to cost people money to rectify it which is all the
> plaintiff wanted in the first place. As far as the libel part goes I
> hope those that were responsible for it are found and prosecuted.
> Trying to ruin ones lively hood over Usenet flames is lower than low
> and no one of the AUK regulars or Kookologists as known otherwise
> would have ever crossed that line.
>
> So there you have it. Rebut as you may (after all you're the one who
> must have the last word) I shall not read or reply.

I'll take the "Last Word", Twinkie-Boi.

If you were served legal papers thaen you would change your "tune" about
the "Big Ko0kologist" suit.

We wuldn't read your posts as you would be hiding under your bed like
your pals Osterwald, Cannon, and Pinky Sue !!

Have a Happy & Fat life, retard...
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
news:gs8l0g$97e$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
In article <8f673096-05ca-4e7b-83a6-
5f7f05...@d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, hoofp...@equsphoto.net
says...
>
> On Apr 15, 1:59 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> > In article <5322877.Lhg5PPC...@127.0.0.1>, r...@127.0.0.1 says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Kali wrote:
> >
> > > > In article <2184196.rkjTcnf...@127.0.0.1>, r...@127.0.0.1
says...
> >
> > > >> Kali wrote:
> >
> > > >> > In article <3171623.W1tQA7e...@127.0.0.1>, r...@127.0.0.1
> > > >>says...
> > ...
> > > >> i'm not the tard here thinking that usenet is a "battel", am i?
> >
> > > > No idea. Are you hungry?
> >
> > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battel
> > > > Battel, or Battels (of uncertain origin, possibly connected with
> > > > "battle," a northern English word meaning to feed, or "batten")
was
> > > > a word used at the University of Oxford for the food ordered by
> > > > members of the college as distinct from the usual "commons".
> >
> > > no. i was speaking of the misspelled version of "battle", spaz.
> >
> > Humor for humor.
> >
> > Some say my humor is too dry at times.
> >
> > > >> just checking. so who gloms onto *your* posts when you flame
richard?
> >
> > > > I can count on at least two or three kooks responding to just
about
> > > > everything I write, and some of it is libel per se.
> >
> > > > Should I sue?
> >
> > > i suppose if what you are speaking of is published on a website
owned by
> > > someone and the content is false and seeks to cause damage to the
people
> > > being libeled. nasty messages on usenet from cypherpuke servers?
not so
> > > much. people who own webservers are liable for what is on them.
> >
> > I think there's too much lying about people going on everywhere, and
> > it can be damaging. I like the truth, (or at least a well formed
> > opinion) backed up with evidence, but it gets me more wrath for the
> > buck.
> >
> > > >> ...and who will be the next AUKtard to hypocritcally whine
about people
> > > >> "going RL" for legal purposes, as opposed to the illegal and
anonymous
> > > >> reasons that most of you retards employ in your smear
campaigns.
> >
> > > > Please be more specific.
> >
> > > > Are you suggesting that auk regulars should just stop mocking
and
> > > > awarding people for their stupid and weird and frankly sometimes
> > > > bizarre ideas and behavior on Usenet,
> >
> > > no. i'm suggesting that whoever takes what you just mentioned far
enough to
> > > make RL contact has every reason to be sued.
> >
> > We agree.
> >
> > > i don't think that anybody is suing over "kook awards". do you?
> >
> > No other way to interpret it, really. Have you seen the complaint?
> >
> > > > and instead go RL for legal
> > > > purposes and sue the kooks who have gone RL on them in order to
> > > > smear their names?
> >
> > > not really the same... it would be the JUDGE who would smear the
names if
> > > they are found to be GUILTY, no? formally complaining about
someone who
> > > may have committed a crime is not libel. if these AUK people were
so
> > > worried about being "smeared" for libel, perhaps they would have
conducted
> > > their business on usenet in such a way that their identity could
not be
> > > determined when they created libelous websites with the obvious
intent of
> > > smearing someone.
> >
> > On the libelous web sites, you and I agree.
> >
> > > > Maybe you're on to something.
> >
> > > i dunno... whatever. maybe AWOL AUKtards like lewis, davis, and
wilson
> >
> > I don't know them, at least by those names. Of course I came here
> > from spp back in the day when Brad's stuff was crossposted here, and
> > I've had breaks - several months to whole years where I've not read
> > auk.
> >
> > > didn't really contact my employer a half-dozen times and make all
of those
> > > stupid websites about me and spam people at my workplace with
usenet BS...
> > > yeeeaaah.
> >
> > That's wrong. I'm sorry that happened to you.
> >
> > > > For every one auk regular who has outed someone for purposes of
> > > > smearing or whatever, I can probably name about 5 or 6 kooks who
do
> > > > that for google-stacking.
> >
> > > well, funny... the three auktards above were seen in a yahoo group
archive
> > > getting boners over what a google search for my name was turning
up after
> > > their "assistance" instead of my legit work websites and
homepages.
> >
> > They sound like kooks to me.
> >
> > > > I can name several kooks who think
> > > > stalking and harassing people offline is justified when someone
> > > > disagrees with them or calls them out on their Usenet lies.
> >
> > > but you didn't name anybody.
> >
> > In my case? Brad Jesness, Lynne Lyons, G. Giarmo, John C., Bowtie...
> > that's just in my case.
>
> You delusional obsessive liar!! you went real life on me, everything
> that comes out of your mouth or is typed on usenet is just the
> opposite.
> Michael Davis Beware. Kali's a real lifer and a liar.

>
> Thank you Google Alerts.
> Kali stop mentioning my name especially when the events that
> transpired are recorded in SMDH archives on you and your kiss-ups.
> Lynne
>

Lynne, when you tell someone that you've called the police and filed
a report against them, you should expect them to follow up on it.

And yes, it's all in the archives.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So are you, Skank !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

[King John I of AUK]

"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message

news:gs8qin$97e$6...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> In article <jfefu45hl2balpna0...@4ax.com>,
> monta...@spam.invalid says...

> >
> > Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:51:23 -0500, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,

> > >Montavious Python <monta...@spam.invalid> got double secret

> > >probation for writing:
> > >
> > >>Bob Larter <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Aratzio wrote:
> > >>>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT), in the land of

> > >>>> alt.usenet.kooks, HoofPrints <hoofp...@equsphoto.net> got

double
> > >>>> secret probation for writing:
> > >>>>

> > >>>>> Thank you Google Alerts.
> > >>>>> Kali stop mentioning my name especially when the events that
> > >>>>> transpired are recorded in SMDH archives on you and your
kiss-ups.
> > >>>>> Lynne
> > >>>>

> > >>>> Lynne Lyons Lynne Lyons Lynne Lyons Lynne Lyons
> > >>>> Hoofprints Hoofprints Hoofprints Hoofprints
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I do so enjoy google alerts.
> > >>>
> > >>>So, if I say Lynne Lyons or Hoofprints, Goofy will get an alert?
> > >>
> > >>Probably. But not so much if you say "Lynn3 Ly0ns" or
"G00fprints" or
> > >>"G00fy".
> > >>
> > >>
> > >I would think then that the typing of Lynne Lyons would be
mandatory.
> >
> > I agree with this post. In fact, anyone who responds further in
this
> > subthread -without- typing out "Lynne Lyons" ought to be nominated
for
> > Coward of the Month.
> >
> > I mean, hey, it's ten frickin letters.
> >
> > Watch me do it: Lynne Lyons. Now was that so hard???
>
> Bad boys, bad boys... please leave Goofy in retirement peace.
> --

> Kali-cow

That was unusually nice of you, Skank !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
news:2o4llc....@news.alt.net...
> "Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:C60CF7F1.1199C%restavek...@yahoo.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/16/09 2:41 PM, in article 2o4jl7....@news.alt.net, "Meat
Plow"
> > <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:32:11 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
> >> <greg...@home.fake>wrote:
> >>
> >>> These creeps get scummier and scummier as time passes. Freaking
> >>> netKKKops
> >>> and organized, bogus abuse complaint, letter writers! Imagine
that,
> >>> trying
> >>> to get HJ booted from his ISP just because he calls them a bunch
of fat
> >>> fags
> >>> (which they seem to me to be without a doubt).
> >>>
> >>> That's why anybody who goes up against these creeps should
consider
> >>> getting
> >>> an account with Altopia. They can send in a million bogus
complaints and
> >>> all
> >>> that will happen is they will be automatically round-filed after
being
> >>> laughed at.
> >>
> >> So you're saying that Altopia is the place for fuckheads like you
and
> >> doesn't process complaints?
> >>
> >> Let's see what Chris has to say about this Greggy. Chris and I have
> >> been friends for many years and I'm sure he would like to know
which
> >> one of his customers is slurring his name.
> >>
> >> CC'd to ab...@altopia.com
> >
> > BWAAHAHAAHAAA!!!
> >
> > The stAUKers are so spanked that they have to resort to
netkkkopping,
> > despite their piteous whimpers about "it's only words on a screen"
when
> > the
> > process server shows up.
> >
> > I'm betting you'll get as much satisfaction from Caputo as Osterwald
is
> > getting from CenturyTel, or Eddie Wollman gets from, well, just
about
> > anybody he complains to. And rightly so: saying that a news server
will
> > ignore "bogus complaints" is a compliment, especially when dealing
with a
> > gang of cyberbullies like yourselves.
> >
>
>
>
> Did you notice how Plow attempted to twist a compliment into a slur as
if
> anybody wouldn't notice his shabby, liberal, attempted re-write of
history
> tactics? Plow and his ilk are such morons that they think everybody is
as
> stupid as they are.
>
> My fearless prediction is these people are so stupid that Atlas Bugged
will
> wipe the courtroom floor with the entire sorry lot of them.
> --
> Gregory Hall

IAWTP !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:slrnguf7r...@pjr.gotdns.org...

> In alt.usenet.kooks on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:19:53 -0600, Dead Kitten

> <ic9b...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
> > And I can confirm that Altopia does in fact ignore bogus complaints.
> > They take legitimate complaints seriously, but bogus ones fall on
deaf
> > ears.
>
> Absolutely! However, complaints aren't necessarily bogus just because
> you think they are.
>

> > I know this because I was an Altopia customer for years and years
> > and had many a netkkkop unsuccessfully try to get them to shut me
up.
> > (Only reason I dropped them was because I can get what I want
without
> > shelling out $12 a month or whatever they were charging at the
time.)
>
> I agree with these sentences.
>
> Btw, are you enjoying the part of your friend RT's troll in which he
> pretends I'm a netkkkop?
> --
> PJR >:-o<==8

You are the one that Forged those Deco posts and started the Net-Kopping
stuff, Ross-the Puss !!
Please drop dead from AIDS ASAP, Net-Kop Ross !!
--
Your Pal,
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message

news:2o6u7k....@news.alt.net...
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:57:53 -0400, Russell Tavek
> <restavek...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >

> Spit the hook you fucking idiot.

Spit the Twinkie you fucking Fat Idiot...
--
Your Pal,
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49e83e2a$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> Meat Plow wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:32:11 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
> > <greg...@home.fake>wrote:
> >
> >> These creeps get scummier and scummier as time passes. Freaking
netKKKops
> >> and organized, bogus abuse complaint, letter writers! Imagine that,
trying
> >> to get HJ booted from his ISP just because he calls them a bunch of
fat fags
> >> (which they seem to me to be without a doubt).
> >>
> >> That's why anybody who goes up against these creeps should consider
getting
> >> an account with Altopia. They can send in a million bogus
complaints and all
> >> that will happen is they will be automatically round-filed after
being
> >> laughed at.
> >
> > So you're saying that Altopia is the place for fuckheads like you
and
> > doesn't process complaints?
> >
> > Let's see what Chris has to say about this Greggy. Chris and I have
> > been friends for many years and I'm sure he would like to know which
> > one of his customers is slurring his name.
> >
> > CC'd to ab...@altopia.com
> >

> > From: "Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake>
> > Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,misc.legal
> > Subject: Re: Welcome to misc.legal
> > Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:32:11 -0400
> > Organization: Overqualified for MENSA
> > Lines: 53
> > Message-ID: <2o2290....@news.alt.net>
>
> Chris definitely doesn't roundfile complaints 'automatically'. Back
when
> I was an Altopia user, he talked to me about a couple of complaints
> people made about me, after I'd pushed the grey areas of his AUP.

> --
> Mrs. Rick Mather

Were you able to "French-Kiss" him through the phone like Freddie Kruger
??
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:C60CF2F5.11995%restavek...@yahoo.com...
>
>
>
> On 4/16/09 1:56 PM, in article 2o4h2h....@news.alt.net, "Meat
Plow"

> <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>
> > I don't hold anyone to anything, Fuckhead.
>

> Gee, it looks like someone is a little bit upset that his buddies were
> caught red-handed in a blatant act of netkkkopping, despite his
earlier
> insistence that we should all ignore "words on a screen."
>
> Osterwald posted these original messages X-No-Archive: I figured I
should
> preserve them for posterity, so that history can look back on the day
that
> Carl "Art Deco" Osterwald received a spanking from Honest John and ran
> crying for someone to put an icepack on his reddened ass cheeks.
>
>
>
> Path:
>
motzarella.org!feeder.motzarella.org!news.motzarella.org!feeder.erje.net
!new
>
s.glorb.com!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!auth.brown.octanew
s.co
> m.POSTED!not-for-mail
> Subject: Contacting CenturyTel.net abuse
> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:17:31 -0600
> From: Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net>
> Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
> Message-ID: <120420090817319454%erfc...@usa.net>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
> Mail-Copies-To: nobody
> User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.2 (Carbon/OS X)
> X-Face: $0`~>:Rs1EQXhUQD4EGt:-COgL2Yy0O>a*LX04;mO;(Mg$rU,4wT^6?VJ*wO$
>
pR9MNF=QZrhF"$HA44sG?n(RnC{0!e>5EKJK{?&5QI$HfYWdP*z"NGgP79xb%0Sch26o
>
G8|k?UC[~)lu]"WnopcGdzz"VoCsDY?/{M"gR9eDs>Y~X},^2Ay|9n9~~1&UUCoDQ|O|
>
eYokL{N-%%x6C_4lKt2,LOOY#A6rAjZ5~[1-s,It[DT\BZa1v_2D7;0Yq1rQ{LcW@J2*
> )f
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> X-Tholen-Is-A-Whiner: Yes
> X-Hammer-of-Thor: September 2005
> X-Diamond-Hammer-of-Thor: March 2007 [as part of the AFA-B Bullies]
> X-Pierre-Salinger-Memorial-Hook-Line-&-Sinker: June 2008
> Lines: 14
> Organization: Octanews
> NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Apr 2009 09:17:21 CDT
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@octanews.net
>
> Recently I've had cause to contact CenturyTel.net concerning the
> activities of one of their customers on Usenet. CenturyTel is an ISP
> in the Southern U.S. that farms their Usenet feed out to GigaNews.
> Unfortunately, email to their X-Complaints-To abuse email address
> appears to be routed to /dev/nul as they don't even generate an
> auto-response. GigaNews says that the problem is CenturyTel's.
>
> Does anyone know of a way to contact someone at CenturyTel who will
> take the time to investigate? GigaNews includes an NNTP-Posting-Host
> header, and the person apparently uses his real email address, so I
> can't see how an investigation would require much time.
>
> --
> Official Art Deco Post
>
>
> *****
>
> Path:
>
motzarella.org!feeder.motzarella.org!news.motzarella.org!pjr.motzarella.
org!
> not-for-mail
> From: Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid>
> Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
> Subject: Re: Contacting CenturyTel.net abuse
> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:31:12 +0100
> Organization: none
> Lines: 46
> Message-ID: <slrngu45q...@pjr.gotdns.org>
> References: <120420090817319454%erfc...@usa.net>
> Reply-To: Peter J Ross <peadar...@gmail.com>
> X-Trace: news.eternal-september.org
>
U2FsdGVkX1/4cf5I7HyjqQ71HTV3MnravEXJ5M+cOUnchp8nzEzyWpACJkV3O9lyE12Fe8Vy
6ueX
> E0jAMQBdYrG3FXTQnoGLcT2g4/pJ0Vj9IzBugh4b48U4sf8xFeamqBhUpQWAl6w=
> X-Complaints-To: Please send complaints to ab...@motzarella.org with
full
> headers
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC)
> X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1953JKjHOwRkug9qVcu1sME
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:6feq7UK/jbrgv7TxYtHqdwLSdZ4=
> User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-10/mm (Linux)
>
> In news.admin.net-abuse.usenet on Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:17:31 -0600, Art
> Deco <erfc...@usa.net> wrote:
>
> > Recently I've had cause to contact CenturyTel.net concerning the
> > activities of one of their customers on Usenet. CenturyTel is an
ISP
> > in the Southern U.S. that farms their Usenet feed out to GigaNews.
> > Unfortunately, email to their X-Complaints-To abuse email address
> > appears to be routed to /dev/nul as they don't even generate an
> > auto-response. GigaNews says that the problem is CenturyTel's.
> >
> > Does anyone know of a way to contact someone at CenturyTel who will
> > take the time to investigate? GigaNews includes an
NNTP-Posting-Host
> > header, and the person apparently uses his real email address, so I
> > can't see how an investigation would require much time.
>
> Have you tried writing to
>
> CenturyTel, Inc.
> 100 CenturyTel Dr
> Monroe, LA 71203
> US
>
> or telephoning
>
> (318) 388-9000
>
> or emailing
>
> chris....@centurytel.com
>
> (who is the adminsitrative contact listed by WHOIS) ?
>
>
> I'm aware of the CenturyTel customer to whom you're referring, but I'm
> not aware that his activities amount to abuse OF the net, though his
> abuse of you ON the net may well land him in prison if you choose to
> pursue the matter. Unless he's perpetrating abuse OF the net, NAN-AU
> probably can't help much.
>
>
>
> --
> PJR :-)
> slrn newsreader v0.9.9p1: http://slrn.sourceforge.net/
> extra slrn documentation: http://slrn-doc.sourceforge.net/
> newsgroup name validator: http://pjr.lasnobberia.net/usenet/validator
>
> *****
>
> Path:
>
motzarella.org!feeder.motzarella.org!news.motzarella.org!news.glorb.com!
news
>
2.glorb.com!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!auth.brown.octanew
s.co
> m.POSTED!not-for-mail
> Subject: Re: Contacting CenturyTel.net abuse
> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:14:47 -0600
> From: Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net>
> Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
> Message-ID: <120420091514471592%erfc...@usa.net>
> References: <120420090817319454%erfc...@usa.net>
> <slrngu45q...@pjr.gotdns.org>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
> Mail-Copies-To: nobody
> User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.2 (Carbon/OS X)
> X-Face: $0`~>:Rs1EQXhUQD4EGt:-COgL2Yy0O>a*LX04;mO;(Mg$rU,4wT^6?VJ*wO$
>
pR9MNF=QZrhF"$HA44sG?n(RnC{0!e>5EKJK{?&5QI$HfYWdP*z"NGgP79xb%0Sch26o
>
G8|k?UC[~)lu]"WnopcGdzz"VoCsDY?/{M"gR9eDs>Y~X},^2Ay|9n9~~1&UUCoDQ|O|
>
eYokL{N-%%x6C_4lKt2,LOOY#A6rAjZ5~[1-s,It[DT\BZa1v_2D7;0Yq1rQ{LcW@J2*
> )f
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> X-Tholen-Is-A-Whiner: Yes
> X-Hammer-of-Thor: September 2005
> X-Diamond-Hammer-of-Thor: March 2007 [as part of the AFA-B Bullies]
> X-Pierre-Salinger-Memorial-Hook-Line-&-Sinker: June 2008
> Lines: 91
> Organization: Octanews
> NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Apr 2009 16:14:36 CDT
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@octanews.net
>
> Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>
> >In news.admin.net-abuse.usenet on Sun, 12 Apr 2009 08:17:31 -0600,
Art
> >Deco <erfc...@usa.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Recently I've had cause to contact CenturyTel.net concerning the
> >> activities of one of their customers on Usenet. CenturyTel is an
ISP
> >> in the Southern U.S. that farms their Usenet feed out to GigaNews.
> >> Unfortunately, email to their X-Complaints-To abuse email address
> >> appears to be routed to /dev/nul as they don't even generate an
> >> auto-response. GigaNews says that the problem is CenturyTel's.
> >>
> >> Does anyone know of a way to contact someone at CenturyTel who will
> >> take the time to investigate? GigaNews includes an
NNTP-Posting-Host
> >> header, and the person apparently uses his real email address, so I
> >> can't see how an investigation would require much time.
> >
> >Have you tried writing to
> >
> > CenturyTel, Inc.
> > 100 CenturyTel Dr
> > Monroe, LA 71203
> > US
>
> Yes.
> >
> >or telephoning
> >
> > (318) 388-9000
> >
> >or emailing
> >
> > chris....@centurytel.com
> >
> >(who is the adminsitrative contact listed by WHOIS) ?
>
> No, and no. Thanks for the suggestions.
> >
> >
> >I'm aware of the CenturyTel customer to whom you're referring, but
I'm
> >not aware that his activities amount to abuse OF the net, though his
> >abuse of you ON the net may well land him in prison if you choose to
> >pursue the matter. Unless he's perpetrating abuse OF the net, NAN-AU
> >probably can't help much.
>
> I was just hoping for some pointers, rather than blasting into town
> demanding a UDP as so many are wont of doing. CenturyTel has a
> somewhat restrictive AUP, BTW:
>
>
<http://support.centurytel.net/index.cfm?action=centurytel.support.legal
>
> :ADDENDUM A
> :ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY
> :1. General Policy. CenturyTel reserves the sole discretion to
> :deny or restrict your Service, or immediately to suspend or
> :terminate your Service, if the use of your Service by you or
> :anyone using it, in our sole discretion, violates the Agreement
> :or other CenturyTel policies, is objectionable or unlawful,
> :interferes with the functioning or use of the Internet or the
> :CenturyTel network by CenturyTel or other users, or violates the
> :terms of this Acceptable Use Policy ("AUP").
> :2. Specific Examples of AUP Violations. The following are
> :examples of conduct which may lead to termination of your
> :Service. Without limiting the general policy in Section 1, it is
> :a violation of the Agreement and this AUP to: (a) access without
> :permission or right the accounts or computer systems of others,
> :to spoof the URL, DNS or IP addresses of CenturyTel or any other
> :entity, or to penetrate the security measures of CenturyTel or
> :any other person's computer system, or to attempt any of the
> :foregoing; (b) transmit uninvited communications, data or
> :information, or engage in other similar activities, including
> :without limitation, "spamming", "flaming" or denial of service
> :attacks; (c) intercept, interfere with or redirect email or
> :other transmissions sent by or to others; (d) introduce viruses,
> :worms, harmful code or Trojan horses on the Internet; (e) post
> :offtopic information on message boards, chat rooms or social
> :networking sites; (f) engage in conduct that is defamatory,
> :fraudulent, obscene or deceptive; (g) violate CenturyTel's or
> :any third party's copyright, trademark, proprietary or other
> :intellectual property rights; (h) engage in any conduct harmful
> :to the CenturyTel network, the Internet generally or other
> :Internet users; (i) generate excessive amounts of email or other
> :Internet traffic; (j) use the Service to violate any rule,
> :policy or guideline of CenturyTel; or (k) use the Service in any
> :fashion for the transmission or dissemination of images
> :containing child pornography or in a manner that is obscene,
> :sexually explicit, cruel or racist in nature or which espouses,
> :promotes or incites bigotry, hatred or racism.
>
> --
> Official Art Deco Post

I just got a call to be on "Oprah"...I'm famous now thanks to Colorado
Carl !!
--
KHJ

p.s. I've changed my mind about pissing on your grave, Deco...

p.p.s. Thanks again !!

[King John I of AUK]

"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message

news:2o773n....@news.alt.net...
> "King John I of AUK" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
> news:wamdnQfpXeEgWnXU...@centurytel.net...
> >
> > "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message
> > news:gsad77$4tu$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >> Bob Larter wrote:

> >> > Gregory Hall wrote:
> >> >> "Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

> >> >> news:49e6c523$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> >> >>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:

> >> >>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
> >> >>>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in
message
> >> >>>>> news:gs3ih5$aa2$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >> >>>>>> Aratzio wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:19:42 -0500, in the land of
> >> >>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> > <ni...@databasix.com>

> >> >>>>>>> got double secret probation for writing:
> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>> No one tells me what I can post or where or when.
> >> >>>>>>> You left out <STOMP!>
> >> >>>>>> The <STOMP!> is reserved for your friend and mine, Charles
> >> >>>>>> Novins. <makes note to buy stiletto pumps for court>

> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

> >> >>>>> And do something about that hair. The last photo of you
> >> >>>> Gee. There must be a whole gallery out there that I no nothing
> >> >>>> about.
> >> >>>>> I saw looked
> >> >>>>> like your hair was a wig or not your natural color- maybe too
> > much
> >> >>>>> henna (sp??).
> >> >>>> No henna.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Doesn't match your eyebrows.
> >> >>>> My eyebrows are black. Not dark brown. Black.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> See if you can borrow "Roz's" sexy footwear that she's
wearing
> > in
> >> >>>>> this picture.
> >> >>>>> http://www.ren.org/rafil/gpc/gpcpics/DSCF0002a.jpg
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> You would look hot wearing those and a mid-thigh length basic
> >> >>>>> black, pleated skirt with white ruffled blouse buttoned up
> >> >>>>> showing just a hint of cleavage. But still, that hair! Change
> > the
> >> >>>>> color to some dark blonde color with lighter highlights and
some
> >> >>>>> loft on the top of your head. Also wear a pair of Sarah Palin
> >> >>>>> glasses and look afraid. The judge will have mercy on you and
> > let
> >> >>>>> you off easy.
> >> >>>> Fashion advice on usenet. Be still my heart.
> >> >>> He'll be giving you his favourite makeup tips next.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Rhonda has potential. Her negatives (wide mouth with thin lips,
> >> >> large chin, prominent cheek bones, longish nose) are easily
> >> >> minimized using the proper make-up techniques. Her positives
(very
> >> >> pretty wide-spaced eyes and perfect eyebrows are easily to
> >> >> accentuate with makeup so one tends to not even notice the less
> >> >> appealing aspects below the eyes. Rhonda needs to: 1) Use plenty
of
> >> >> pastel eye shadow-blue preferable, dark eyeliner,
> >> >> dark eyelash coloring.
> >> >> 2) powder or no-shine make-up base on prominent cheek bones
> >> >> 3) Hair styled to not hide her ears, fluffy on top and rounded
> >> >> tapering inwards towards base of neck. Hair length no longer
than
> >> >> shoulders and jade stud earrings
> >> >> 4) a choker collar along these lines
> >> >>
> >
http://jewelry.hsn.com/studio-barse-turquoise-sterling-silver-tribal-16-collar-necklace_pf-285735_xp.aspx?
> >> >> 5) her wide mouth, though a minus because of rather thin lips,
can
> >> >> be made a plus with the proper application of rich lipstick to
make
> >> >> her lips look thicker. Especially the upper lip.
> >> >> 6) a dab of powder on the nose to get rid of any shine.
> >> >> 7) change hair color from reddish brown to a darker blonde with
> >> >> lighter highlights. Thin it out a bit and fluff it up. (unless
the
> >> >> picture I'm looking at is a wig)
> >> >>
> >> >> I'd love to do a make-over on Rhonda. I could turn her into one
hot
> >> >> babe.
> >> >
> >> > Jebus. If I'd made this shit up about you, Gweggie, nobody
would've
> >> > believed me.
> >>
> >> You want to give Greg a makeover?
> >>
> >> I know what picture he's looking at, btw. I'm just wondering how he
> > got
> >> his hands on it. Figuring that out might solve a mystery.

> >> --
> >> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
> >

> > I didn't have anything to do with whatever you're thinkin'...
> > --
> > KHJ
>
> Methinks thou dost protest too much, HJ!!!
> --
> Gregory Hall

She has a suspicion that you and I are the same person, you know, like
Superman (me) and Clark Kent (you).

I have several of her pictures that I look at while the wifey massages
"Russell" with a bag over her head...usually on Friday nights...

OK, next time you can be Superman !!
--
KHJ

p.s. Say where's Olson ??

[Gregory Hall]

"King John I of AUK" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote in message

news:UfOdnSionsJ1U3XU...@centurytel.net...

Rhonda and half the people on Usenet think everybody has dozens of sock
puppets. They don't stop to think that many people have similar writing
styles and most never think to modify them if they do sock up. It's pretty
dumb to have socks that all sound the same. If you're really good at socks a
man can even sock up as a woman and vice versa and not have anybody suspect.

In some dumb bead group several years ago I had half a dozen different
female socks each with a different personality and some even fighting the
others. Some one group of women kill filed and others another group of women
killfiled and they were cat fighting amongst themselves while my socks egged
them on. It was a riot.

--
Gregory Hall

[King John I of AUK]

"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message

news:2o7b67....@news.alt.net...

This will make Lionel start ranting with Jealously as he/she laces-up
the corset...

> In some dumb bead group several years ago I had half a dozen different
> female socks each with a different personality and some even fighting
the
> others. Some one group of women kill filed and others another group of
women
> killfiled and they were cat fighting amongst themselves while my socks
egged
> them on. It was a riot.
> --
> Gregory Hall

I bet that it was a real "hoot'...
--
KHJ

[Bob Larter]

Tell us again how Rhonda is wrong to think that you have a bunch of
sockpuppets, Gweggie?

PS: And a big "Hello" to Lynne Lyons, AKA "Goofy",
who's watching this from Google Alerts!

[King John I of AUK]

"henri" <he...@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:kntku49fq1ord0d4f...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:33:13 -0400, "atlas bugged"
> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"miguel" <mun...@mungge.com> wrote in message
>
> >> On the other hand it's possible you overestimate your influence.
>
> >Thinking is a serious challenge for you, it's why you bore me.
>
> I completely refuse to believe that miguel is your mother.

But you do adit that Colorado Carl is yo daddy...

[King John I of AUK]

"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> In a moment of mental clarity wrote:
>
> This is a silly, rather pointless group - it was meant to be.

That's what your pal Pinky said before he turned Cowardly and <ran away>
!!

> But just like the rest of Usenet (and really, if you think auk is a
> hate group, you ain't seen nothin' of the rest of Usenet,
> seriously.

State your "Official Internet Credintials" for making an assinine
statement like that...

> I'm just here because I know some people here, find
> occasional discussions interesting, and find Usenet behavior rather
> fascinating. My home group was destroyed by trolls and kooks who
> outed and stalked the professionals who posted there.

So that's why you joined Carl Osterwald in attacking posters
that he was viciously attacking in other groups. (eg. alt.astronomy)

Did that make you feel better about your destroyed "home" newsgroup ??

Did that give you comfort for not being born a boy like your daddy
wanted ??

Prozac does make people like you do crazy things.....ease-up on your
dosage a tad !!

> I'm a very warm, compassionate, person, Atlas.

Please post ANY evidence of that on this like line:

_____________________________________ .

> I'm very curious about people, rather playful, and
> I have a good sense of humor. I'm not bitter and
> I honestly don't hate anyone.

Then why do you join "Hate campaigns" and support the Haters (AUK
caballers) like Cannon, Osterwald, Lamb, Aratzio, Cujo, PJ Ross, Rick
Mather, Lionel Lauer, Meat Plow, etc ??

Why did you so viciously attack Rhonda Lea a couple of years ago ??
Because you supported the vicious hater Rick Mather ??

You TALK one path but WALK the other, girly !!

> posts. No one is forcing you to read what I have to say.

Likewise no one is forcing you to read what I say about you, yet you
worry every single day that you post here what I'm going to say because
you haven't once apologized for you viciously attacking me on Deco's
orders.

Since it does bother you what I say, then why don't you simply apologize
for attacking me in the past and I won't ever respond to your posts
again ??

Is that too hard for your SUPER EGO to handle or will it make you seem
weak in the eyes of the "remaining" evil Hate caballers that are not
getting sued at the moment....

Come-on, grow a pair (make your daddy happy) and just post one decent
statement that you are sorry for what you did three years ago.....How
simple is that ??

> On Usenet where there is no regulation.

The why is PJ Ross Net-KKKopping me and forging the posts of Art Deco,
right now ??

If Ross is doing that because I'm still responding to your posts, then
you can stop that by posting one simple sentence:

" I am truly sorry for all the past posts where I attacked you and won't
mention your name again in the future" and then you will get a similar
post from me...

I will be waiting to see if you really want me to STOP posting to you or
not...

Sitting on the fence,
Honest John C.

p.s. I just bet $20 with an attorney friend of mind
that you really want me to continue this so that
you can get "Lots of Sympathy" from the Haters.......time will
tell !!

p.p.s. Do you feel a "pair" growing ?? Act now !!

[King John I of AUK]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:rerku4pvv31a4q2qi...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:37:29 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> Kali <ka...@happy.joy> got double secret probation for writing:
>
> >In article <2oac7n....@news.alt.net>,
> >atlasbug...@gmail.com says...

> >>
> >> "Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message

> >> news:gsdi36$a4u$4...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >> > In article <2o7vti....@news.alt.net>,
> >> > atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Peter J Ross" <p...@example.invalid> wrote in message
> >> >> news:slrngui9d...@pjr.gotdns.org...
> >> >> > In alt.usenet.kooks on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:34:26 -0400, atlas
bugged
> >> >> > <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> idiot
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> an unruly mutt
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The Atlas Bugged Experience
> >> >> >> <http://kukpedia.notlong.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > PJR :-)
> >> >>
> >> >> I get it! So let's do PJR, on his level...
> >> >>
> >> >> moron
> >> >>
> >> >> coward
> >> >>
> >> >> blowhard
> >> >>
> >> >> impotent
> >> >>
> >> >> liar
> >> >>
> >> >> Fucking incredibly repulsive take-me-to-your-leader alien ugly!
> >> >
> >> > See, even Atlas can be playful and silly. Er, if he weren't
serious.
> >>
> >> Somehow, trying to destroy my livelihood, along with those I love
and
> >> support, makes me...serious.
> >>
> >> Go figger.
> >
> >Oh, I understand this, I've experienced a very similar situation. In
> >fact there are several good hearted people in auk who would be very
> >sympathetic to your situation and supportive of your efforts to
> >clear your name. Unfortunately for them, someone from Usenet has
> >crossed the line into their personal lives, accusing them of doing
> >something they didn't do. So they are kinda busy defending
> >themselves at the moment. All this real lifing is the death of
> >Usenet with one clear exception - defending against those who have
> >actually libeled or otherwise legally trespassed against you. In
> >your case Roger, for example. That would be a case of defense and
> >even Usenet heroism.
>
> Contrary to his claims, it is all about "getting even" with people who
> fail to respect his self professed greatness.

Oh, and you never do that !!

If you say yes then we ALL know that you are a Loon !!

FOAD at your earliest convience,
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"atlas bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2oamcn....@news.alt.net...

>
> "Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message

> news:gsdgsc$a4u$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> In article <2o7so1....@news.alt.net>,

> atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > "Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message

> > news:gsb3ft$cu1$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> > > In article <2o7nnc....@news.alt.net>,
> > > atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
> > >>
> > >> Because your posts are so numbingly worthless, I cannot bear to
follow
> > >> them
> > >>
> > > Then don't.
> >
> > Reading comp issues? I said I don't.
>
> What are you responding to, then? C'mon...
>
> > > Threat noted, bully.
> >
> > It was a promise. Demanding a person live within the law is not a
> > "threat," idiot.
>
> You made a theat to name me in your suit.
> ------------------------------------------
> No.
>
> See, it's interesting that your reply, below, has some measure of
coherence.
> That's actually unusual in AUK.
>
> What I actually said was that if you did something actionable, you'd
be
> named, and if not, not.
>
> I *promised* to eventually review your posts and decide which.
>
> But because we're talking *in* AUK, it's always a bunch of horseshit
> posturing, playing to the crowd. It's a "threat," from a "bully."
>
> Since you don't seem to be much of a "hider" like your cowering maggot
> buddies, you can talk to me in e-mail. Or on the phone.
>
> But as long as it's "on stage," it's always going to be you and The
Game.
>
> I don't play.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> I've consulted an
> attorney. You have no cause of action against me.
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> More game-play. You paid a real-deal attorney to review all your
posts and
> ruled out any violation of NJ causes of action?
>
> Horseshit. Go posture and lie elsewhere. I acknowledge some of what
you
> say about Usenet culture.
>
> But you think lying, misrepresenting, fraud, and vile behavior gets
wiped
> clean because you believe - even correctly - it's "Usenet culture?"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Still you are making threats. You are bullying me. I don't see how
> your posture toward me could be perceived in any other manner. If
> you continue to threaten me, I will no longer respond to you. If you
> claim to take action against me, then you can interpret my silence
> to mean that I'm represented and that ends our discussion, as well.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, whatever.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Not only do I live within the law, I stive to understand and honor
> the culture in which I find myself. I respect other people's
> boundaries, and the boundary between Usenet and people's lives; I
> understand that people will behave differently on Usenet than they
> would in their lives.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The law recognizes no such boundary. Grow up.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> You don't seem to understand the Usenet newsgroup, auk, in any kind
> of context. You don't know the history of it or the players. You
> can't tell trolls from the regulars. You ignore the culture and
> customs of auk and fail to see it in perspective wrt the rest of
> Usenet (very small influence on Usenet) and especially in perpective
> to people's lives off Usenet.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> I understand it better than before, but I'll concede I know less of it
than
> regulars.
>
> I'll learn a lot in depositions, I'm sure, about both specifics and
> generalities.
>
> But part of that culture is to hide, right? The law supercedes that.
>
> Technology can occasionally supersede the law, but when it
can't...you'd
> better deal with me on my terms.
>
> That's mere common sense.
>
> But that's the problem here. An aspect of "Usenet culture" is
rejection of
> reason.
>
> Someone had a cool sig, it was Isaac Asimov, "You cannot reason with
someone
> who rejects reason at the outset" or something like that.
>
> People who reject reason leave only one alternative. That's why law
exists.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Usenet is just an odd, different little world in the basement of the
> Internet. It, unlike life, can be switched off very easily. For
> example, you left Usenet for six months, and no one (in auk) said a
> word about you.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wrong. But the volume went down, sure.
>
> > You are oblivious to both terms, it seems, "threat," and "bully."
>
> I don't think so. Let's see:
>
> Courtesy of m-w.com: [BITCHSLAP]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, this was a game of scrabble, or pictionary.
>
> Don't bother posturing with me on Usenet, you don't "win," though
everyone
> loses because it's boring.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> You do realize you are are posting in a Usenet newsgroup chartered
> and dedicated to full-on snark and the recognition of kooky ideas
> and people on Usenet, right? I'm going to offer you a free clue:

> This is a silly, rather pointless group - it was meant to be.
>

> This is not a lecture hall or professional group or anything of the
> sort, although some of the most interesting discussions I've had on
> Usenet, outside of the time I was a co-moderator in a sci.psychology
> group, have occured here.

>
> But just like the rest of Usenet (and really, if you think auk is a
> hate group, you ain't seen nothin' of the rest of Usenet,

> seriously), auk gets trolled and bad apples like Kent and Roger
> bring people like you here for awards. There are a lot of Kents and
> Rogers on Usenet, unfortunately. I usually ignore them.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> AUKtards embraced both of them, and there is every evidence they
*were* one
> or both of them.
>
> The sequence of events is that I first exposed "Roger" as a lying
nymshifter
> who defrauded the AUK "awards" process. This is June, '07:
> http://rogerbust.notlong.com
>
> The Kent Wills troll was also embraced by AUK at this time and long
after
> libeling other posters beyond what any non-lawyer could easily
identify.
>
> But I somehow earned the wrath of AUK - definitely "regulars" - by
pointing
> out "Roger/Wills" were criminals. This is around October, '07
> http://pinkygkhypocrisy.notlong.com
>
> Months later, the kitchen started to get hot, and the regulars saw
what was
> coming - we're now well into '08:
> http://pinkcutloose.notlong.com
>
> That's when the Roger/Wills disease gets tossed off, and the libel
machine
> continues working against me, the one who busted them.
>
> And all the talk of "[Roger/Wills] isn't one of us" starts to look
like a
> whole lot of self-protection.
>
> The only thing that changed was a lawyer entered the scene and all
concerned
> finally grasped that they had libeled the wrong person.
>
> Your angelic "regulars" should have consulted lawyers then, because
they
> were still over the line.
>
> Please do NOT try to hand me the story that AUK "regulars" were not
either
> "Wills/Roger" in fact or supporters of the libel until damages were
obvious
> and they ran like roaches.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> > And you again demonstrate your charm, your desire for
> collaboration instead
> > of conflict, uh, not.
>
> Do you feel entitled to my charm? What kind of collaboration do you
> seek?
> --------------------------------------------------------
> You - and your co-reprobates - will either concede what you've done
and/or
> help me get the true perp, or you'll show your true colors as you have
all
> along - a hate group that wants to operate unaccountably, in the dark,
and
> so far as the best evidence so far indicates, as a lawless gang.
>
> Each time you tell me you "know" the regulars are not the guilty
parties,
> the question becomes how you could?
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> If you want charm and collaboration, you're going about it the
> wrong way. I'm just here because I know some people here, find

> occasional discussions interesting, and find Usenet behavior rather
> fascinating. My home group was destroyed by trolls and kooks who
> outed and stalked the professionals who posted there.
>

> What do you really seek? Do you want to know who Roger is, so that
> you can bring him to justice for libeling you? The evidence is
> abundant. I'm no lawyer, but you seem to have solid evidence against
> him. I suggest that you have been mistaken in your approach to
> "collaboration". The big problem is that people in auk don't know
> Roger so I'm not sure what kind of collaboration you would seek.
> He's definitely no friend of anyone here. In fact, he was rightly
> shunned because of his behavior.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> How do you know what everyone else does or doesn't know?
>
> You clowns aren't going to last long under skilled questioning.
>
> The "Roger/Wills" troll was welcomed with open arms by your
"regulars," long
> after it was obvious what it was.
>
> Those "regulars" are still spewing hate and libel and hiding like rats
from
> legal process.
>
> Innocent people don't act that way, period. They don't seek to
further
> victimize the victim, either.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> The bottom line, Atlas, is that reasonable people seeking
> collaboration don't bully people with the threat of lawsuits. The
> threat of a lawsuit shuts down communication and creates enmity or
> fear; it doesn't do anything to aid in this "collaboration" you
> claim to have been seeking. And coming from an attorney at law, as
> you claim to be, the metaphor that pops to mind is "collaboration at
> gunpoint".
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> You're a posturing asshole. I got zero cooperation before the legal
> "threat," and only now am I getting some responses.
>
> I was the one that exposed "Roger," then got libeled for doing you
idiots
> the favor.
>
> I read his falsified headers - and I'm not a tech - and had to bring
them to
> the attention of AUK.
>
> This earned me intensified abuse. Don't give me your lying horseshit
about
> the lawsuit polarizing anything.
>
> You are a hate group and anti-reason, so you can be dealt with only
one way.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> It reminds me of the habit of a retired "psychiatric technician" in
> a psychology group who, when people would point out that she was
> less than truthful, or otherwise disagree with her, threatened to
> call the opponent's local authorities to have them put on a 24-hour
> psychiatric hold. I'm not in the mental health field, myself, but I
> think what she did was wrong.
>
> What do you think about that?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> I think your analogy sucks, and you suck.
>
> Just public forum "Usenet culture," right? I'm supposed to flame you
when
> you're wrong, right?
>
> > Seriously, you actually went past high school?
>
> *yawn*
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> It's a valid remark, considering your AUKtard posturing. E-mail or
call and
> you can show me your post-secondary-school skills.
>
> "Usenet culture" obviously prevents you from doing so in front of your
> friends.
>
> > Yeah, I'm not a "people person," but it's not my job, how about you?
>
> I'm a very warm, compassionate, person, Atlas. [BITCHSLAP]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> Talk is cheap. You're either part of the problem, or part of the
solution.
>
> I was libeled, blatantly, you know it, you don't give a rat's ass,
fine, at
> least stop lying.
> --

> The Atlas Bugged Experience
> <http://kukpedia.notlong.com>

EXCELLENT RESPONSE !!

<printer sounds>
--
John C.

[King John I of AUK]

"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
>

> In the privacy of your own mind, you may wish to ask yourself why
> you often diagnose opponents with personality disorders;
> specifically narcissism. You don't need to tell me why.

In the privacy of your own mind, you know that you "Broke your daddy's
heart" by not being born a boy.

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....

Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....Guilt.....

Sadness.....Sadness.....Guilt.....
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>

<snip lots of mindless foam and Ko0kdancing by Roz Ratzio>

> meanies of AUK.

Which includes your Fat ass !!
--
KHJ

[erfc...@hotmail.com]

On Apr 16, 10:14 pm, Sgt.Pres...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 16, 8:12 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
>
>
>
> > And yes, all the gerbils are in my ass.
> > --
> > Kimberly Kay Barnard
>
> You're SICK...just like that Sunday School teacher in California!
> --
> Sgt.

You're right, Sgt. Kali has been under too much stress & strain
trying to compete in a "Man's World".
--
Art Deco

[King John I of AUK]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:healu49kbrhgu562g...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:25:16 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> got double secret
> probation for writing:
>
> >Aratzio wrote:
> >> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:40:33 -0500, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> got double secret
> >> probation for writing:
> >>
> >>> Aratzio wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:50:04 -0400, in the land of

alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>> Kali <ka...@happy.joy> got double secret probation for writing:
> >>>>

> >>>>> In article <gsdn0c$dq$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> >>>>> ni...@databasix.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <gsba1q$41i$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
> >>>>>>> ni...@databasix.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Aratzio wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:45:21 -0500, in the land of
> >>>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
<ni...@databasix.com>

> >>>>>>>>> got double secret probation for writing:
> >>>>>

> >>>>> ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I do read and comprehend. I'm also well aware that the
> >>>>>>>> personality disordered write screwy things to which there is
no
> >>>>>>>> real direct response.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That would be you, btw.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Fortunately for him, you are no psychologist.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> He doesn't have a manifest personality disorder. He's just a
> >>>>>>> fuckhead.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is that the best insult you could come up with?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I expect it's a cut above calling someone a sociopath for
asking
> >>>>>> you a question for which you have no answer. Don't you agree?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've never done that, as you describe it. But then your
perceptions
> >>>>> are always a bit twisted. If I referred to someone as a
sociopath
> >>>>> (a fairly generic lay term) it was probably a good assessment of
> >>>>> their behavior in context - not a diagnosis of any kind of
> >>>>> disorder. There is a difference.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Besides which, the discussion is about posting and reposting
> >>>>>>>> Lynne's name in an attempt to flood her with Google Alerts.
It
> >>>>>>>> is not about my hypocrisy or Novins or stilettos or anything
> >>>>>>>> else you tried to bring into it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Here is a hint: Who mentioned your initial idiocy wrt to
> >>>>>>>>> novins?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Whenever you have no response, we get "here's a hint."
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You're brittle to the breaking point, Ratz. That's what
happens
> >>>>>>>> to incurables when they get to be your age.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Let experience be your guide, or so they say.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yeah, I was married to one--diagnosed by an experienced
> >>>>>> professional about seven years before I met him, but not
apparent
> >>>>>> to me at the time of our marriage. It wasn't until his whole
> >>>>>> schtik nearly sent me off the rails that he called his shrink
to
> >>>>>> prove to me I was the problem, not him, and the truth came out.
> >>>>>> Of course, the psychologist I was seeing for the problems my
> >>>>>> husband attributed to me had already called it, so it didn't
come
> >>>>>> as much of a surprise to me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> When you become a diagnostician, let me know.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Likewise. Maybe you should stick to law.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In the meantime, I'll rely
> >>>>>> on my experience.

> >>>>>
> >>>>> In the privacy of your own mind, you may wish to ask yourself
why
> >>>>> you often diagnose opponents with personality disorders;
> >>>>> specifically narcissism. You don't need to tell me why.
> >>>>>

> >>>>>> After all, as I mentioned above, you didn't do a very
> >>>>>> good job of calling it with Mike either.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I didn't diagnose Mike with any kind of disorder. I may have
made a
> >>>>> comment about his behavior. Two different things.
> >>>>
> >>>> EEEEK!
> >>>>
> >>>> PLONK!
> >>>
> >>> In this case, plonking would be a whole lot better, overall, than
> >>> documenting the failure of recollection.
> >>
> >> Were you born without a sense of humor or did you have it
surgically
> >> removed?
> >
> >Ah, black and white thinking.
>
> My Big Fat Mouth rests.

It's about time, you Ko0kdancer !!
--
KHJ

[erfc...@hotmail.com]

On Apr 18, 5:11 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> In article <C60EB81E.11BC3%restaveksanma...@yahoo.com>,
> restaveksanma...@yahoo.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 4/17/09 5:19 PM, in article gsarmr$3d...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,
> > "Kali" <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
>
> > > In article <C60E2068.11B5A%restaveksanma...@yahoo.com>,
> > > restaveksanma...@yahoo.com says...
>
> > >> On 4/16/09 9:53 PM, in article gs8nd3$97...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,
> > >> "Kali" <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
>
> > >>> But your issues, other than the suspicions you have about Cujo,
> > >>> aren't with aukers. I and my friends who post to auk are not
> > >>> heartless, cruel, people.
>
> > >> Suppose a number of people at your daughters' school decided to set up a
> > >> "Kali's Daughter is a Kook" webpage, complete with disparaging comments
> > >> about her appearance, her personal hygiene, her sexual habits and her mental
> > >> state.  Suppose they followed her around various forums responding to
> > >> everything she posted with "STFU skank" and the like along with links to
> > >> that page.   Would you think of them as heartless and cruel?
>
> > > I would think they are idiots with no life, and so would my
> > > daughter. I would take issue with their behavior, instead of
> > > criticizing their target.
>
> > But yet you feel the need to make excuses for your friends when they engage
> > in exactly that sort of behavior -- and to join in it.  Does that make you
> > feel powerful? Do you get a visceral thrill out of playing "make the kook
> > foam at the mouth?" games? What's the attraction?
>
> Examples, threads? I just don't recall crossing any lines, myself.
>
> > Ehrenfels is a windbag, but he made a few good points about the motivations
> > and behaviors of your little crew.  So have others. Yet you continue to deny
> > them: you would rather identify with the abuser than the abused,  I guess.
> > Not all that surprising, really, given your history.
>
> Psychoanalytic bullpucky. Worth every dime you paid for it. You
> obviously aren't very familiar with that situation, or you'd know
> that I actually defended him on several occasions. He turned on me
> because I questioned his motives in his dealings with graduate
> students. It wasn't a kookology thing, it was a group/topical
> debate.
>
> > > Your turn to share about your children, now. Yes, no? Why not? You
> > > obviously believe it's fair game.
>
> > No children here, by choice.
>
> That's not the point. Or maybe it makes you insensitive to the
> issue.
>
>   I've got a few pets but I doubt they'd have a
>
> > lot of interest in anything that could be said here.  If I did have
> > children, I'd be smart enough to refrain from teasing the crazy people: a
> > few decades living in urban environments taught me enough street smarts to
> > learn that teasing mentally ill people
>
> Point out where I've teased mentally ill people. Or STFU.

You lying Bitch!

You teased Honest John for 6 months and you should have known that he
was crazy,

He even posted that he was crazy and on disability for it!

How could you be such a stupid cow?
--
Art Deco

[erfc...@hotmail.com]

On Apr 18, 5:36 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> In article <2845032.UMULoqq...@127.0.0.1>, r...@127.0.0.1 says...
> > Kali wrote:
>
> Me, I just hang out mainly. I like to argue with right wingers. I
> like to laugh and play and be silly. I suck as a troll.

LIAR! You make fun of mentally ill people!

> > > John C. was already in auk when I first read their posts. He's been
> > > humping my every post for three years, although I largely ignore
> > > him. All for being friends with Art Deco and some mild flaming in a
> > > couple of threads three years ago. He can dish it out, but he can't
> > > take it.
>
> > OMG it sounds like he is as bad as any self-proclaimed AUK champion.
>
> Evidence of one auk regular who does such a thing. One.

LIAR! There are a dozen examples.

> > > You must be ignoring him, as most people do, most of the time.
>
> > no, art deco pretends to "ignore" me, actually.
>
> So that's how he harasses you?
>
> Yep.

LIAR! I don't "pretend". I just ignore you.

> > > So now what do you have against auk? Those people weren't auk
> > > posters. They should have been disenfranchised from auk officially
> > > (lol) you know what I mean. auk should shun people who do fuckheaded
> > > things like what was done to you, don't you think?
>
> > i have nothing against AUK.  i have been trolling trolls on usenet since
> > 1994 and just ended up here because it's a treasure trove of fucktarded
> > bullies that i used to enjoy goading into making RL contact.
>
> Your RLing assholes weren't auk people. You keep ignoring this fact.

LIAR! You are lying, they are AUK people.
--
Art Deco

[King John I of AUK]

<erfc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:82d55a4b-0a8b-4bc1...@g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree with ya Art !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

<erfc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9d0476af-157d-42c2...@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 18, 5:36 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> In article <2845032.UMULoqq...@127.0.0.1>, r...@127.0.0.1 says...
> > Kali wrote:
>
> Me, I just hang out mainly. I like to argue with right wingers. I
> like to laugh and play and be silly. I suck as a troll.

LIAR! You make fun of mentally ill people!

You made fun of me, Skank Liar !!

--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
>

> What we need is some serious haha around here.
> --
> Kali-cow

What you need is a diet, Chubbs...
--
KHJ

[Sweetness]

"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message

news:2o7b67....@news.alt.net...
: "King John I of AUK" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote in message

Yup, you had KKKalera-The NetKKKoping-KKKunt-Stratton foaming at the
mouth, Nelly. Too sad that you had no sense of self control.

:
: --
: Gregory Hall
:
:

[Gregory Hall]

"Sweetness" <sweetchixo...@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:gsfj8p$64o$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...

Yup, that Kalera Stratton was one way uptight dumb Kunt for sure. She was
another Katysails with her mail bombing multiple abuse complaints from
herself and her pals. I wonder if she got fired from her job like Katysails
did when her employer found out how she was using the company computer?

--
Gregory Hall

[Kali]

In article <ee6a24db-c02f-4721-b1f8-9d4e018c2632
@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, erfc...@hotmail.com says...

Crazy?

Well, Honest John/erfc/Sgt. Preston, etc. I didn't tease you for six
months. I recall you dishing out some funny/flaming/provocative
stuff and I responded to you in a very small handful of threads. I
had no idea you'd respond to every single post I write for 3 years,
98% of the three years' time having been utterly ignored by me, and
yes, that's batshit crazy. Yet you seem proud.

> He even posted that he was crazy and on disability for it!

You're a notorious liar, so I pay no heed to anything you say. You
tell lies without batting an eye. You claim to be a retired school
teacher in one place, and a t.v. repairman elsewhere - having worked
your way up from toasters or something like that. But even a
notorious liar tells the truth now and then, so I looked up this
claim, and I find one post in the alt.talk.bollocks, demon.local,
free.uk.talk.sheffield groups authored by you three years ago:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.bollocks/msg/446b9522adba1a9
7

The information you provide is:

> Forced retirement, I'm on disability.
> HJ

I don't read those groups.

If there is anything out there where you told *me* three years ago
that you were mentally ill, or on mental health disability, and/or
you just wanted people to leave you alone, then please post it. I'd
like to see it. If this were the case, you probably should have been
Formosa'd. I would have supported it.

That said, all I saw from you was a massive volume of vulgar vitriol
directed at other people, as intentional and coherent as it was
provocative of what you got back in return.

It's too bad that you act like a vile piece of shit for years, then
try to make excuses like this one. And then you try to blame me? You
have no excuse for your behavior toward me. None. Be responsible and
admit you dished out more than you could handle in return from
several people, and that you like to take it out on me for sick
kicks.

> How could you be such a stupid cow?

If you wanted to be left alone, you sure have a funny way of showing
it, by humping all of my posts. Yet I have left you alone, and will
continue to do so, dumbass from Dumas.

*plonk this sock, too*

--
"Free speech is crucial to a free society, something
that we will not have if we close off communication
from groups we do not like, either the Taliban... or
the right wing nutters. If people say crazy and offensive
things they will be mocked. If they are not mocked, the
rest of us are not presenting proper counter arguments."
-My friend Ken

[Sweetness]

"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message

news:2ocabt....@news.alt.net...
: "Sweetness" <sweetchixo...@yahoo.ca> wrote in message

Golly gee wiz.. I dunno, Nelly. Perhaps you should round up your then
multiple personalities and your current multiple personalities, form a
posse, and go see.

Did you manage ta take care of netKKKopping Gaynzy too ?

[George Orwell]

Google Cecil Warren sex offender. The truth about him needs to get out!!

Wilbur Hubbard AKA Neal Warren AKA Cecil Warren AKA Gregory Hall AKA other sockpuppets like Sal Monella:

You've failed to register as a SEX OFFENDER. This is punishable by imprisonment!

http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/flyer.do?personId=35467

Call 1-888-357-7332 to report him. He lives in Islamorada, Florida.

--
T

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

[King John I of AUK]

"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message

news:gsgjcq$si4$5...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...

Art Deco, erfc...@hotmail.com says...

>
> On Apr 18, 5:11 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:

> > Point out where I've teased mentally ill people. Or STFU.
>
> You lying Bitch!
>
> You teased Honest John for 6 months and you should have known that he
> was crazy,

Crazy?

Well, Honest John/erfc/Sgt. Preston, etc. I didn't tease you for six
months. I recall you dishing out some funny/flaming/provocative
stuff and I responded to you in a very small handful of threads. I
had no idea you'd respond to every single post I write for 3 years,
98% of the three years' time having been utterly ignored by me, and
yes, that's batshit crazy. Yet you seem proud.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
That 2% that I made you "Ko0kdance" was precious...
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> He even posted that he was crazy and on disability for it!

You're a notorious liar, so I pay no heed to anything you say.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Not in what I posted about myself...
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

You
tell lies without batting an eye.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Depends on who I'm posting to....
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

You claim to be a retired school
teacher in one place, and a t.v. repairman elsewhere - having worked
your way up from toasters or something like that.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
That's all true !! You missed the working in a chicken plant.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

But even a
notorious liar tells the truth now and then, so I looked up this
claim, and I find one post in the alt.talk.bollocks, demon.local,
free.uk.talk.sheffield groups authored by you three years ago:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.bollocks/msg/446b9522adba1a9
7

The information you provide is:

> Forced retirement, I'm on disability.
> HJ

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
True...
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I don't read those groups.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Your loss....
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

If there is anything out there where you told *me* three years ago
that you were mentally ill, or on mental health disability, and/or
you just wanted people to leave you alone, then please post it. I'd
like to see it. If this were the case, you probably should have been
Formosa'd. I would have supported it.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I want to cry now... <grabs hanky>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

That said, all I saw from you was a massive volume of vulgar vitriol
directed at other people, as intentional and coherent as it was
provocative of what you got back in return.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I'm a quick learner from you, Art Deco, Fred Hall, Pinky Sue, Cujo, &
PJR.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

make excuses like this one. And then you try to blame me? You
have no excuse for your behavior toward me. None.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
You and Art Deco attacked me first, don't forget that !!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Be responsible and
admit you dished out more than you could handle in return from
several people, and that you like to take it out on me for sick
kicks.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I dished it out on Art Deco and he "RAN AWAY !!

I dished it out on Fred Hall and the bastard "RAN AWAY" by dying !!

I dished it out on Pinky Sue and he/she "RAN AWAY" !!

I dished it out on Cujo and he "RAN AWAY" !!

I dished it out on PJR and he avoided me 24/7 like the weasel that he is
!!

I dished it out on you and finally have "PAY BACK" (+) Interest !!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

> How could you be such a stupid cow?

If you wanted to be left alone, you sure have a funny way of showing
it, by humping all of my posts. Yet I have left you alone, and will
continue to do so, dumbass from Dumas.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I don't live in Dumas, you Dumbass from Wisc !!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
In fact, I don't live in La......I've posted hundreds of times
that I live in the Ozarks in Arkansas. Soo much for your
failed investigation...
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*plonk this sock, too*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"Got you to respond" - I WIN AND STUFF !!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Oh, OK I'm sorry for attacking you with Art deco three years ago!
Is that OK?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Yes it is !! I won't respond to you again....as long as
you leave me alone !!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
--
Kali

~~~~~~~~~~~
You'll miss me,
Honest John C.
~~~~~~~~~~~

[Gregory Hall]

"Sweetness" <sweetchixo...@yahoo.ca> wrote in message

news:gsgm2u$rnm$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
<huge snip>

> Golly gee wiz.. I dunno, Nelly. Perhaps you should round up your then
> multiple personalities and your current multiple personalities, form a
> posse, and go see.
>
> Did you manage ta take care of netKKKopping Gaynzy too ?
>
>

The Gay One is still around but he's had to tone it down considerably. It
seems he's got big problems with the IRS right about now.
Bwahahhahahahahhahahah.

--
Gregory Hall

[Bob Larter]

Really? When did you post about that, Dishonest John?

[King John I of AUK]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49ed24fa$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> Lionel Lauer

Fred Hall found it and used it several times.....he also knew how to
find out who I really am, but took that info to his grave !!
Hee....Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

I'm planning a trip to Texas this summer to water-down his grave with a
special liquid that I will dispense with a special nozzle.....
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Sharky" <sha...@hellsgates.cor> wrote in message
news:49edad29....@news.webtv.com...
> Bob Larter wrote:
>
> >henri wrote:
> >> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:53:41 +1000, Bob Larter
<bobby...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> henri wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:30:12 +1000, Bob Larter
<bobby...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:

> >>>>
> >>>>> atlas bugged wrote:
> >>>>>> Yeah, I'm not a "people person,"

> >>>>> No kidding.

> >>>>>> but it's not my job,

> >>>>> Really? I thought lawyers needed people skills to be successful.
> >>>> It's not his job to be successful. Apparently, it is his job to
be a
> >>>> k00k.
> >>> Is it true that he got kicked out of his dad's law firm?
> >>
> >> I have no knowledge of that. That's the kind of thing that could
be
> >> libelous to state as a fact if one acted with actual malice in
stating
> >> it on a Usenet newsgroup. On the other hand, if it's true, it's
> >> entirely protected.
> >>
> >> Among the potentially defamatory statements in his "Exhibit A,"
that's
> >> the least worrisome. There are a bunch of outrageously defamatory
> >> statements in there which are certainly actionable. Too bad for
buggo
> >> that none of the people he's suing said them. Too bad for buggo
that
> >> the CDA has been interpreted to bar his exact claim. Too bad for
> >> buggo that he's dumb as a stump.
> >
> >If Chuckwit thinks his kooksoot will stop people laughing at him in
AUK,
> >he really is as dumb as a stump.
> >Speaking of which:
> >
> >NOMINATION: Charles Novins for the Balsa Gavel award.
> >---
> >Balsa Gavel
> >
> >The Balsa Gavel is a special award, to be given by vote in
recognition
> >of outstanding Kook legal practice on the Internet. Simply spouting
> >legal innuendo and threatening lawsuits does not meet this high bar;
> >this happens as often as top-posting. This award goes to actual Kook
> >legal practice, such as a lawsuit manifesto when you ARE an actual
> >attorney; playing an attorney on Usenet; impersonating an officer of
the
> >law; dragging your opponents into court.
> >
> > List of Winners
> >Larry "the Stupid" Bullis
> >John Martin Grubor, AKA "Goober"
> >Pete Stapleton, AKA "PEAT"
> >Raymond Ronald Karczewski (bailed)
> >Barbara Schwarz
> >Anita Karczewski
> >Steven Ray Winter, AKA "Steebie"
> >Gordon Roy "Ray Gordon" Parker
> >John Bunt, AKA "Guy Fawkes"
> >Richard M. Scoville
> >Tim Bolen
> >Douglas G. V. "Doogie Grant" Reiman
> >Scott Lifshine, AKA "Wereo"
> >---
>
> Seconded
>
> He also deserves a CotM for threatening harm to the families of those
> he's named in his current k00ks00t.

Who exactly are you submitting this Crap to ??

Pinky Sue as run away like a bitch !!

Peter "Eater" Ross has also dropped the Gay-Ko0kologists Awards like a
Hot potato !!

I have Officially Outlawed Gay-Ko0kologist Awards in AUK !!

WTF, <over> ??
--

[art.colorad...@gmail.com]

On Apr 20, 9:28 pm, "King John I of AUK" <honestj...@centurytel.net>
wrote:
> "Bob Larter" <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote in message

I want to piss on his grave too.
--
Art Deco

[art.colorad...@gmail.com]

On Apr 21, 6:55 am, "King John I of AUK" <honestj...@centurytel.net>
wrote:

> "Sharky" <sha...@hellsgates.cor> wrote in message
>
> news:49edad29....@news.webtv.com...> Bob Larter wrote:
>
> > >henri wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:53:41 +1000, Bob Larter
>

> <bobbylar...@gmail.com>> >> wrote:
>
> > >>> henri wrote:
> > >>>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:30:12 +1000, Bob Larter
>

> <bobbylar...@gmail.com>

IAWTP!
--
Art Deco

[§ñühw¤£f]

art.colorad...@gmail.com spilled the beans:

> On Apr 20, 9:28 pm, "King John I of AUK" <honestj...@centurytel.net>
> wrote:

[snip]

>>
>> I'm planning a trip to Texas this summer to water-down his grave with a
>> special liquid that I will dispense with a special nozzle.....
>> --
>> KHJ
>
> I want to piss on his grave too.
> --
> Art Deco

The Epitomy of Sad: replying to your own socks.

Go stand in the corner, tardlette.

--
http://www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

_..._ ___ ___ ___ ___ _..._
,' `::. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,' `::.
: `::: `:: `:: `:: `:: `:::
: .::: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:::
: .:::`. .;' `. .;' `. .;'.`. .;': .:::
: .::: `.' .`.'.: `.' ::`.' :. .:::
:. .::' ::: : `: .:::
`: .:: : : .::'
: .:: . :. .::
: ::' `: .::.
.\ `: ,: :. : .::.:
:.\ :. :.: :`: .' .::.:
::`. : :':: : `: : .;'.:
: `.; :'.:: : :: ;:' ::
. :' .::. .: .:: :
: :' ::: :' .:: .
: `:: : .::
:' .::. .: .:::
: .::: ,:. .:. :' .:::
: .:::,' `:. ,' `:.: .:::
: .::: ::: ::: .:::
: .::: ::: ::: .:::
`._ .::'.`._.::' `._.::'.`._ .::' _ Seal _
~~~ :: :: ~~~

[art.colorad...@gmail.com]

On Apr 21, 5:50 pm, §ñühw¤£f <snuhw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> art.colorado.carl.d...@gmail.com spilled the beans:

>
> > On Apr 20, 9:28 pm, "King John I of AUK" <honestj...@centurytel.net>
> > wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >> I'm planning a trip to Texas this summer to water-down his grave with a
> >> special liquid that I will dispense with a special nozzle.....
> >> --
> >> KHJ
>
> > I want to piss on his grave too.
> > --
> > Art Deco
>
> The Epitomy of Sad: replying to your own socks.

Eat a "Root" Faggot !!
--
Art Deco

[King John I of AUK]

<erfc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4e3c8d42-8cf0-494c...@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 22, 9:36 am, "King John I of AUK" <honestj...@centurytel.net>
wrote:
> "Hoots" <ratty_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:HBCHl.32077$b9.1...@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>
>
>
> > King John I of AUK wrote:
> > > "Hoots" <ratty_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >news:y4hHl.31372$i9.2...@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
> > >> King John I of AUK wrote:
> > >>> "Kali" <k...@happy.joy> wrote in message
> > >>>news:gsgjcq$si4$5...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>
> > >>> Art Deco, erfc-1...@hotmail.com says...

> > >>>> On Apr 18, 5:11 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> > >>>>> Point out where I've teased mentally ill people. Or STFU.
> > >>>> You lying Bitch!
>
> > >>>> You teased Honest John for 6 months and you should have known
> that
> > > he
> > >>>> was crazy,
> > >>> Crazy?
>
> > >>> Well, Honest John/erfc/Sgt. Preston, etc. I didn't tease you for
> six
> > >>> months. I recall you dishing out some funny/flaming/provocative
> > >>> stuff and I responded to you in a very small handful of threads.
I
> > >>> had no idea you'd respond to every single post I write for 3
> years,
> > >>> 98% of the three years' time having been utterly ignored by me,
> and
> > >>> yes, that's batshit crazy. Yet you seem proud.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> That 2% that I made you "Ko0kdance" was precious...
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>>> He even posted that he was crazy and on disability for it!
> > >>> You're a notorious liar, so I pay no heed to anything you say.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> Not in what I posted about myself...
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>> You
> > >>> tell lies without batting an eye.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> Depends on who I'm posting to....
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>> You claim to be a retired school
> > >>> teacher in one place, and a t.v. repairman elsewhere - having
> worked
> > >>> your way up from toasters or something like that.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> That's all true !! You missed the working in a chicken plant.
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>> But even a
> > >>> notorious liar tells the truth now and then, so I looked up this
> > >>> claim, and I find one post in the alt.talk.bollocks,
demon.local,
> > >>> free.uk.talk.sheffield groups authored by you three years ago:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.bollocks/msg/446b9522adba1a9
>
>
>
>
>
> > >>> 7
>
> > >>> The information you provide is:
>
> > >>> > Forced retirement, I'm on disability.
> > >>> > HJ
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> True...
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>> I don't read those groups.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> Your loss....
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>> If there is anything out there where you told *me* three years
ago
> > >>> that you were mentally ill, or on mental health disability,
and/or
> > >>> you just wanted people to leave you alone, then please post it.
> I'd
> > >>> like to see it. If this were the case, you probably should have
> been
> > >>> Formosa'd. I would have supported it.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> I want to cry now... <grabs hanky>
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>> That said, all I saw from you was a massive volume of vulgar
> vitriol
> > >>> directed at other people, as intentional and coherent as it was
> > >>> provocative of what you got back in return.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> I'm a quick learner from you, Art Deco, Fred Hall, Pinky Sue,
> Cujo,
> > > &
> > >>> PJR.
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>> make excuses like this one. And then you try to blame me? You
> > >>> have no excuse for your behavior toward me. None.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> You and Art Deco attacked me first, don't forget that !!
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>> Be responsible and
> > >>> admit you dished out more than you could handle in return from
> > >>> several people, and that you like to take it out on me for sick
> > >>> kicks.
>

> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > >>> I dished it out on Art Deco and he "RAN AWAY !!
>
> > >>> I dished it out on Fred Hall and the bastard "RAN AWAY" by dying
> !!
>
> > >>> I dished it out on Pinky Sue and he/she "RAN AWAY" !!
>
> > >>> I dished it out on Cujo and he "RAN AWAY" !!
>
> > >>> I dished it out on PJR and he avoided me 24/7 like the weasel
that
> > > he is
> > >>> !!
>
> > >>> I dished it out on you and finally have "PAY BACK" (+) Interest
!!
> > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>

> > >>>> How could you be such a stupid cow?
> > >>> If you wanted to be left alone, you sure have a funny way of
> showing
> > >>> it, by humping all of my posts. Yet I have left you alone, and
> will
> > >>> continue to do so, dumbass from Dumas.
>

> > >> John, I'm glad to see that all your years of hard work are paying
> off.
>
> > >> I'm sure you still have plenty to do, though, right?
>
> > > How right you are !!
>
> > > Carl Osterwald hasn't stepped-up to the plate yet...
>
> > > Maybe after the Big "Internet trial" he will reconsider....
>
> > > I'll be waiting.
>
> > > Thanky you for your concern,
> > > KHJ
>
> > What trial is that HJ?
>
> The trial that has charged "Harassment" for the following AUK members:
>
> 1..Pinky Sue Lamb
>
> 2. K.A. Cannon
>
> 3. Carl Osterwald
>
> 4. Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> They are being sued because they took a bogus and damaging and
libelous
> Usenet post and continued to smear a lawyer and his business and
office
> staff by continuing to repost and discuss said libelous post until
"the
> cows came home" (my opinion only).
>
> Old Carl is probably "up to his ass" in depositions and ratting-out
the
> other Evil AUKers and paying lawyer fees (my opinion only).
>
> If he avoids being found guilty and doesn't have to go to "The Pokey"
> then I will await a statement of his remorse for his past EVIL actions
> and will respond by "burying the hatchet" and all will live happily
ever
> after !! (my opinion only).
>
> Hope this brief statement Klews you in, although I'm sure that you
knew
> all this stuff (my opinion only).
>
> Glad you asked for this enlightenment (my opinion only),
> -- (sig. - my opinion only)
> KHJ (my opinion only)
>
> p.s. Secretly hoping that Osterwald gets the "chair" (my opinion
only).

John, I'll give a statement after the Big Trial. Atlas is kicking my
ass right now!

I think that I can avoid the "chair' by KKKopping on the rest of the
Evil AUKers!!
--
Art Deco

p.s. Cross your fingers that my "sekret info" will "get me off"...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You bet, Carl.......I'm always rooting fer the "underdawg" !! (my
opinion only)
-- (my opinion).
KHJ (my opinion only).

[King John I of AUK]

"Anonymous" <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote in message
news:41794e0045b7a26b...@mixmaster.nymu.eu...
> In article <8qSdnd-CZM8ftnLU...@centurytel.net>
> "King John I of AUK" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Hoots" <ratt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> > news:HBCHl.32077$b9.1...@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> > > King John I of AUK wrote:

> > > > "Hoots" <ratt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> > > > news:y4hHl.31372$i9.2...@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
> > > >> King John I of AUK wrote:

> > > >>> "Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
> > > >>> news:gsgjcq$si4$5...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Art Deco, erfc...@hotmail.com says...

> > > >>>> On Apr 18, 5:11 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> > > >>>>> Point out where I've teased mentally ill people. Or STFU.
> > > >>>> You lying Bitch!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> You teased Honest John for 6 months and you should have known
> > that
> > > > he
> > > >>>> was crazy,
> > > >>> Crazy?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Well, Honest John/erfc/Sgt. Preston, etc. I didn't tease you
for
> > six
> > > >>> months. I recall you dishing out some
funny/flaming/provocative
> > > >>> stuff and I responded to you in a very small handful of
threads. I
> > > >>> had no idea you'd respond to every single post I write for 3
> > years,
> > > >>> 98% of the three years' time having been utterly ignored by
me,
> > and
> > > >>> yes, that's batshit crazy. Yet you seem proud.
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> That 2% that I made you "Ko0kdance" was precious...
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>>> He even posted that he was crazy and on disability for it!
> > > >>> You're a notorious liar, so I pay no heed to anything you say.
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> Not in what I posted about myself...
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> You
> > > >>> tell lies without batting an eye.
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> Depends on who I'm posting to....
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> You claim to be a retired school
> > > >>> teacher in one place, and a t.v. repairman elsewhere - having
> > worked
> > > >>> your way up from toasters or something like that.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> That's all true !! You missed the working in a chicken
plant.
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> But even a
> > > >>> notorious liar tells the truth now and then, so I looked up
this
> > > >>> claim, and I find one post in the alt.talk.bollocks,
demon.local,
> > > >>> free.uk.talk.sheffield groups authored by you three years ago:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.bollocks/msg/446b9522adba1a9
> > > >>> 7
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The information you provide is:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Forced retirement, I'm on disability.
> > > >>> > HJ
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> True...
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> I don't read those groups.
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> Your loss....
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> If there is anything out there where you told *me* three years
ago
> > > >>> that you were mentally ill, or on mental health disability,
and/or
> > > >>> you just wanted people to leave you alone, then please post
it.
> > I'd
> > > >>> like to see it. If this were the case, you probably should
have
> > been
> > > >>> Formosa'd. I would have supported it.
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> I want to cry now... <grabs hanky>
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> That said, all I saw from you was a massive volume of vulgar
> > vitriol
> > > >>> directed at other people, as intentional and coherent as it
was
> > > >>> provocative of what you got back in return.
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> I'm a quick learner from you, Art Deco, Fred Hall, Pinky Sue,
> > Cujo,
> > > > &
> > > >>> PJR.
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>

> > > >>> make excuses like this one. And then you try to blame me? You
> > > >>> have no excuse for your behavior toward me. None.
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> You and Art Deco attacked me first, don't forget that !!
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>> Be responsible and
> > > >>> admit you dished out more than you could handle in return from
> > > >>> several people, and that you like to take it out on me for
sick
> > > >>> kicks.
> > > >>>

> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>> I dished it out on Art Deco and he "RAN AWAY !!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I dished it out on Fred Hall and the bastard "RAN AWAY" by
dying
> > !!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I dished it out on Pinky Sue and he/she "RAN AWAY" !!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I dished it out on Cujo and he "RAN AWAY" !!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I dished it out on PJR and he avoided me 24/7 like the weasel
that
> > > > he is
> > > >>> !!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I dished it out on you and finally have "PAY BACK" (+)
Interest !!
> > > >>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> > > >>>
> > > >>>

> > > >>>> How could you be such a stupid cow?
> > > >>> If you wanted to be left alone, you sure have a funny way of
> > showing
> > > >>> it, by humping all of my posts. Yet I have left you alone, and
> > will
> > > >>> continue to do so, dumbass from Dumas.
> > > >>>

> Does this mean you'll still give Craig Chilton head?

No, but "ah" in 'demon.local' wants to give Craiggie-Weggie a big mess
of "head" !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
>
> Good! So the fear isn't just being felt by the plaintiffs. You should
> fear the escapades of Atlas Bugged. Should you two become one in
> court I can't imagine it being a good thing for Mr. Novins Esq.

Giving legal advise without a license ??

Fat-boi, you got some "GALL" !!

Are you about to "Flip-Out" and go "Postal" with all your mighty guns
and ammo ??

Increase your self-medications !!

I'll send you some of my best "Moon-shine" so you can~~~> Drink your
troubles away !!

Please post your address, Nick Fury...
--
Your Pal,
KHJ

[art.colorad...@gmail.com]

On Apr 23, 9:49 am, "King John I of AUK" <honestj...@centurytel.net>
wrote:
> "Meat Plow" <m...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message

Meat plow doesn't "get it"...
--
Art Deco

[King John I of AUK]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:6r47v4192tq26dg08...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:27:35 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> henri <he...@nowhere.invalid> got double secret probation for writing:
>
> >On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:00:46 -0700, Aratzio
<a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:15:33 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>henri <he...@nowhere.invalid> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >
> >>>I don't think it's going to get that far without him getting over
more
> >>>than a couple hurdles in the way, but obviously he's hoping to get
> >>>over them.
> >
> >>Whether they adopt or not, Rosenthal is existing precedent and from
> >>what I've seen, limited, judges do seem to appreciate being able to
> >>see another opinion.
> >
> >Yes, but they aren't obligated to do anything with it, the difference
> >between binding and persuasive authority.
> >
> >>The point of what was written is that there are NO copies posted by
> >>any of the defendants let alone all of the defendants. The two
people
> >>who initially brought the posts to AUK attention redacted the body
> >>(Kevin & me).
> >
> >If this is true (I'm not aware of any actual copies either) then that
> >obviously is going to be a big issue. And Novins may be in big
> >trouble.
>
> Especially since it has been pointed out to him multiple times. His
> response is that ALL of his opponents are lying.
>
> "Your honor, all of the AUKTards are liars"
> "You have evidence of this Mr. Novins"
> "Yes, Honest John told me they were lying"

Say, you're not as Dumb as you look, Roz........
--
Honest John

[King John I of AUK]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:8cd7v4hvp3bboi916...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:56:08 +0100, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>
> >In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:37:24 -0700, Aratzio
> ><a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:09:31 -0700, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >> miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for writing:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>PS: my first edict as acting FNVW for the month of April will be to
> >>>remove Atlas Bugged from the Galactic Killfile for this month.
> >>
> >> Do you have your "Tinfoil Smbrero" already or are you just looking
to
> >> pick up something shiny at which you can spend endless hours of
> >> enjoyment just staring?
> >
> >Has miguel been endorsed as FNVW by Clockbrain yet?.
>
> Read his posts and find out.

How are those electrolysis treatments coming along, Roz Ratzio ??
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:tfn7v4hf912mhbkm3...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:27:58 +0100, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,

> Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>

> >In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:15:18 -0700, Aratzio

> ><a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:56:08 +0100, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >> Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> got double secret probation for
> >> writing:
> >>
> >>>In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:37:24 -0700, Aratzio
> >>><a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:09:31 -0700, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>> miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>PS: my first edict as acting FNVW for the month of April will be
to
> >>>>>remove Atlas Bugged from the Galactic Killfile for this month.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have your "Tinfoil Smbrero" already or are you just
looking to
> >>>> pick up something shiny at which you can spend endless hours of
> >>>> enjoyment just staring?
> >>>
> >>>Has miguel been endorsed as FNVW by Clockbrain yet?.
> >>
> >> Read his posts and find out.
> >

> >No, it won't be my turn to read Clockbrain's posts until August.
>
> I had my turn 3 years ago.

LIARS !!

You two gurls hang on every post that I make !!
--
KHJ

[King John I of AUK]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f53153$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> MillerT wrote:
> > On 4/26/09 6:53 AM, in article 49f43d2c$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob
Larter"
> > wrote:

> >
> >> Peter J Ross wrote:
> >>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:15:18 -0700, Aratzio
> >>> <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:56:08 +0100, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>> Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> got double secret probation
for
> >>>> writing:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:37:24 -0700, Aratzio
> >>>>> <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:09:31 -0700, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>>>> miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> PS: my first edict as acting FNVW for the month of April will
be to
> >>>>>>> remove Atlas Bugged from the Galactic Killfile for this month.
> >>>>>> Do you have your "Tinfoil Smbrero" already or are you just
looking to
> >>>>>> pick up something shiny at which you can spend endless hours of
> >>>>>> enjoyment just staring?
> >>>>> Has miguel been endorsed as FNVW by Clockbrain yet?.
> >>>> Read his posts and find out.
> >>> No, it won't be my turn to read Clockbrain's posts until August.

> >> And I'm exercising my Executive Privilege not to read them at all.
> >
> > You can delegate that to your staff.
>
> Exactly. Could you please get onto that?
> --
> Lionel Lauer (Mrs. Rick Mather)

You seem to be living under some illusion that a little "corset wearing"
homosexual who lives on the "Island of Exiled English convicts" calls
any shots !!

Hee....Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

That was soooo funny, Mrs. Mather !!

Thanks fer my morning belly laugh....
--
KHJ

p.s. "Corset-Boi" Lionel is my new Court Jester !!

p.p.s. Wolfus-Puss "The Coward" is fired !!!!(Donald Trump impression).

["The Honest One"]

"ah" <splif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:49f659bd$0$35415$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> Peter J Ross wrote:
>
> > I call my brother Darryl and my other brother Darryl.
> I cawl Cleatis.
> --
> ah

I caught you Slurpin' Peter, "ah"......

Shame...Shame !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"ah" <splif...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f65a1f$0$35415$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> Anonymous wrote:
> > In article <2o2tse....@news.alt.net>

> > "atlas bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message

> >> news:gs5b23$6cl$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >> > Meat Plow wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:43:17 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> >> >> <ni...@databasix.com>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Meat Plow wrote:
> >> >>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:19:42 -0500, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> >> >>>> <ni...@databasix.com>wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Rob Wolfe has never treated me ill, and I have no reason not
to
> >> >>>>> treat him in a friendly manner.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> This takes me back to a day a year or so ago when this
identical
> >> >>>> sentence (substitute the name with a certain Tom's River NJ
> >> >>>> resident) was directed towards a friendly warning from me. Too
bad
> >> >>>> said warning was never heeded.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> :(
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Too bad no one ever warned me about you.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah I guess I really have done you a lot of harm haven't I.
> >> >> I've come into your home, cast my writings onto your computer
screen
> >> >> while forcibly holding your head towards it and forcing your
eyes open
> >> >> while screaming READ MY POSTS relentlessly in your ear all the
while
> >> >> holding you at gunpoint threatening to shoot if you didn't read
my
> >> >> posts.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yep I'm the bad one that needed to carry a warning sign that
said DO
> >> >> NOT READ around.
> >> >>
> >> >> OR, it could be that nobody warned you because it wasn't needed.
> >> >> That does make more sense.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> .....heh
> >> >
> >> > Very few people actually buy the bs that "it's only words on the
screen."
> >> > Go ask a real person who lives in the real world what s/he
thinks. You're
> >> > so immersed in auk culture that you've lost all compassion for
your fellow
> >> > humans. I'm not an anthropologist by any stretch of the
imagination, but
> >> > even I recognize primitive tribal behavior when I see it.
> >> >
> >> > How does it feel to be a knuckle-dragger?
> >> >
> >> > Besides which, if words on the screen really have no meaning,
then I'd not
> >> > have objected to Novins' ill words on the screen. Moreover, he
and I would
> >> > still be friends, and I would not even be a party to this
ridiculous
> >> > lawsuit.
> >>
> >> If it's so ridiculous, how come you're desperately hiding from
service, you
> >> preposterous fraud?
> >
> > Be quiet, kook.
>
> Quiet, k0ok.
> --
> ah

Quiet, Peter Slurper !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f6...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> MillerT wrote:
> > On 4/27/09 12:15 AM, in article 49f53153$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob
Larter"

> > Wait a cotton-pickin' minnit. I need to know about the pay and
benefits
> > first. A key to the beer fridge would also help.
>
> You get access to the COO beer fridge *after* work, not before.
>
> > PJR gave me access to the supply closet. You need to top that.
>
> I've got the key now, so I can offer the same deal.
> --
> Mrs. Rick Mather (Lionel)

Miller T you just can't trust PJR or Lionel....They'll drop the soap !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f65ca7$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> Chef Xenu wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 12:16 am, Bob Larter <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Tigger wrote:
> >>> On Apr 26, 2:19 am, Bob Larter <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:
> >>>>> Kat wrote in
> >>>>>
news:a0eafd51-2ef1-4a81...@w35g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
> >>>>>> On Apr 25, 12:55 pm, Bob Larter <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Gregory Hall wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "the messenjah" <theguyontheb...@veryfast.biz> wrote in
message
> >>>>>>>>
news:970f1d7c-047a-468f...@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>>> I wonder if Fred Hall's Ghost will call me on the telephone
and
> >>>>>>>>> call me a "kiddie fuc*er" again?
> >>>>>>>>> http://www.chuck-lysaght.info
> >>>>>>>> Is your number similar to Gary Burnore's? Fred Hall's ghost
might
> >>>>>>>> have dyslexia.
> >>>>>>> How's you campaign to fuck Babbles Schwarz going, Gweggie? Was
she
> >>>>>>> impressed with your new blog?
> >>>>>> I only saw one follower on his shrine to his ego. Bet ya $5
it's BS.
> >>>>> He has a blog?
> >>>> Yep. It's basically a big suck up to Scientology.
> >>> Maybe.....but more likely another big suck up to Barbara Schwarz.
> >> Of course. Babble's the only reason he's taken an interest in
Scientology.
> >
> > It is spring, and love is in the air...
>
> Yeah, & AUK is echoing with the sounds of kook mating calls.
> --
> Lionel Lauer

Yeah, like you and Rick Mather !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f66160$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> pandora wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:04:12 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:47:39 +1000, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks, Bob
> >> Larter <bobby...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >>
> >>> Aratzio wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:51:44 -0700, in the land of

alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>> miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >>>>

> >>>>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:31:34 +1000, Bob Larter
<bobby...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> henri wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:06:42 -0700, miguel <mun...@mungge.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Novins' pronouncement about having an expert reveals a fair
amount
> >>>>>>>> about his perceptions of his case, though. He's anticipating
a
> >>>>>>>> summary judgment motion and thinking he needs to have an
expert to
> >>>>>>>> keep from having his case tossed on summary judgment. He
figures
> >>>>>>>> once he gets past summary judgment he'll finally be able to
force
> >>>>>>>> people to come to the negotiating table.
> >>>>>>> I think he might not even get to summary judgment. I doubt
he's
> >>>>>>> even stated a cause of action against any of the defendants
except
> >>>>>>> the original poster of his "Exhibit A," who isn't a defendant
> >>>>>>> (unless his shotgun complaint somehow managed to hit the
author of
> >>>>>>> "Exhibit A" by pure accident).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim assumes all
the
> >>>>>>> facts are as the plaintiff says they are. Even if so, I don't
see
> >>>>>>> how he states anything resembling a claim that somehow, the
> >>>>>>> defendants are responsible for the harm flowing from the
original
> >>>>>>> posting of "Exhibit A."
> >>>>> Assuming all facts in the complaint means assuming that each of
the
> >>>>> defendants posted Exhibit A. So, no 12(b)(6) motion will work.
> >>>> If he claims cornspiracy by the defendants?
> >>> Yeah, like he's the only net-kook we poke in here.
> >> See, you are cornspiring with me to post the truth, that is not
allowed in
> >> novinsworld.
> >
> > Ah, but according to Buggy, any two people who agree are part of a
> > cornspiracy, doncha know.
>
> Indeed, but I kind of doubt that the judge will see it that way.
> --
> Mrs. Rick Mather

You know nothing as Rick has done screwed your brains out !!

Hee....Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"MillerT" <this...@isamunge.com> wrote in message
news:gt5p2t$e5l$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On 4/27/09 9:52 PM, in article 49f66160$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob
Larter"

> Unless he's part of the conspiracy...

You and Mrs. Mather have been getting pretty "chummie"....Rick Mather
will get Jealous !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f68453$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> I'm sure that's what he'll claim after he loses the case.
> --
> Lionel Mather

Atlas can't lose.....It's a "Slam-Dunk" !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f68436$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> MillerT wrote:
> > On 4/27/09 9:34 PM, in article 49f6...@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob

Larter"
> > wrote:
> >
> >> MillerT wrote:
> >>> On 4/27/09 12:15 AM, in article 49f53153$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob
Larter"
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> MillerT wrote:
> >>>>> On 4/26/09 6:53 AM, in article 49f43d2c$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au,
"Bob Larter"
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Peter J Ross wrote:
> >>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:15:18 -0700,
Aratzio

> >>>>>>> <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:56:08 +0100, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>>>>>> Peter J Ross <p...@example.invalid> got double secret
probation for
> >>>>>>>> writing:
> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:37:24 -0700,
Aratzio

> >>>>>>>>> <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:09:31 -0700, in the land of

alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>>>>>>>> miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>> PS: my first edict as acting FNVW for the month of April
will be to
> >>>>>>>>>>> remove Atlas Bugged from the Galactic Killfile for this
month.
> >>>>>>>>>> Do you have your "Tinfoil Smbrero" already or are you just
looking to
> >>>>>>>>>> pick up something shiny at which you can spend endless
hours of
> >>>>>>>>>> enjoyment just staring?
> >>>>>>>>> Has miguel been endorsed as FNVW by Clockbrain yet?.
> >>>>>>>> Read his posts and find out.
> >>>>>>> No, it won't be my turn to read Clockbrain's posts until
August.
> >>>>>> And I'm exercising my Executive Privilege not to read them at
all.
> >>>>> You can delegate that to your staff.
> >>>> Exactly. Could you please get onto that?
> >>> Wait a cotton-pickin' minnit. I need to know about the pay and
benefits
> >>> first. A key to the beer fridge would also help.
> >> You get access to the COO beer fridge *after* work, not before.
> >

> > What??? You expect me to work SOBER?
>
> If you're reading Outhouse John's mewlings, yeah, I see your point.
> I read his posts for entertainment value and enlightnment......
> --
> Lionel Mather

Read away, Ko0k !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f6...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> Kali wrote:
> > In article <2ove3u....@news.alt.net>, ni...@databasix.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> Oh, but wait, you're the one who wants auk to be a fun place--you
know,
> >> one where you can harass the weak, the lame, the sick--and I'm
spoiling
> >> it for you.
> >
> > I have no interest in harassing the weak, lame, and sick. But right
> > now, Dead Kitten is doing that, and you condone it.
>
> She talks a lot of crap about how people should treat each other, but
> the second that she has a stake in things, her "rules" go out the
> window, & she behaves more badly than the worst of the worst.
> --
> Mrs. Rick Mather

Lionelette, you are so full of "dookie" that you're about to PoP !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:49f7...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> MillerT wrote:
> >
> > And the jury... OMG! The WHOLE WORLD is in on it!
>
> That's right! *Everyone* is out to get poor li'l Chuckwit Novins!
> --
> Mrs. Rick Mather

Not everyone Lionelette !!
--
HJ

[stermen]

NEW & SEALED APPLE IPOD TOUCH 8GB 2ND GEN MB528LL/A

FREE USPS PRIORITY MAIL! BONUS SOFTWARE! CASHBACK!

Click to go

http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?type=4&campid=5336229480&toolid=10001&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Felectronics.shop.ebay.com%2Fitems%2FiPod-MP3-Players_%3FBrand%3DApple%252520iPod%26Product%252520Line%3DiPod%252520Touch%26Condition%3DNew%26_dmpt%3DOther_MP3_Players%26_fln%3D1%26_sacat%3D73839%26_ssov%3D1%26_trksid%3Dp3286.c0.m282%26_mPrRngCbx%3D1%26_udlo%3D179.91%26_udhi%3D267.99%26_qi%3DRTM547901

HELLO ALL AND WELCOME TO OUR BUY IT NOW FOR A BRAND NEW, 100% AUTHENTIC AND
SEALED APPLE IPOD TOUCH! ,
8GB MODEL!! This is the latest and greatest from Apple and the 2ND
Generation of this wonderful iPod!

As well, this is eligible for live.com's cashback. You can get this iPod for
about $186!
Please email us if you need assistance on getting the cashback rebate.

Click to go

http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?type=4&campid=5336229480&toolid=10001&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Felectronics.shop.ebay.com%2Fitems%2FiPod-MP3-Players_%3FBrand%3DApple%252520iPod%26Product%252520Line%3DiPod%252520Touch%26Condition%3DNew%26_dmpt%3DOther_MP3_Players%26_fln%3D1%26_sacat%3D73839%26_ssov%3D1%26_trksid%3Dp3286.c0.m282%26_mPrRngCbx%3D1%26_udlo%3D179.91%26_udhi%3D267.99%26_qi%3DRTM547901

<art_deco_...@yahoo.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:804b6d86-2819-496e...@z5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 16, 8:53 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> In article <4027887.OkPlAI5...@127.0.0.1>, r...@127.0.0.1 says...
>
> > and you're positive that those people weren't just retaliating for
> > attacks
> > from AUKtards?
>
> John C. was already in auk when I first read their posts. He's been
> humping my every post for three years, although I largely ignore
> him. All for being friends with Art Deco and some mild flaming in a
> couple of threads three years ago. He can dish it out, but he can't
> take it.

You're not my friend, you filthy skank!
FOAD

> > when i retaliated, i had copies of the bogus complaints that 2 of the
> > tards
> > had made to my employer in hand and yet i was told that i was a kook for
> > making RL contact and the rest of the AUKtards were (probably still...)
> > in
> > denial about initiating RL.
>
> > john c has gone RL? just because he somehow knows that osterwald likes
> > to
> > gobble knobs? LOL
>
> You must be ignoring him, as most people do, most of the time.
> don't you think?
>
The Honest One seems to have a Luxury Suit in you head now!

> > the fact remains that cujo is a kooky little edmo faanboi.
>
> I see your point.
>
He's almost as Bad as I am!

> > yeah, plausible denialbility doesn't really prove anything. i have
> > little
> > doubt that cujo would use his tech skills to get even with someone
> > online
> > and be savvy enough to not get caught or leave any evidence except red
> > herrings. he isn't stupid. just what he does is stupid and why he does
> > it
> > is pathetic.
>
> You are correct, sir.

Of course he's right about that ass hole!
--
Art Deco (TINAD)

[stermen]

NEW & SEALED APPLE IPOD TOUCH 8GB 2ND GEN MB528LL/A

FREE USPS PRIORITY MAIL! BONUS SOFTWARE! CASHBACK!

Click to go

http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?type=4&campid=5336229480&toolid=10001&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Felectronics.shop.ebay.com%2Fitems%2FiPod-MP3-Players_%3FBrand%3DApple%252520iPod%26Product%252520Line%3DiPod%252520Touch%26Condition%3DNew%26_dmpt%3DOther_MP3_Players%26_fln%3D1%26_sacat%3D73839%26_ssov%3D1%26_trksid%3Dp3286.c0.m282%26_mPrRngCbx%3D1%26_udlo%3D179.91%26_udhi%3D267.99%26_qi%3DRTM547901

HELLO ALL AND WELCOME TO OUR BUY IT NOW FOR A BRAND NEW, 100% AUTHENTIC AND
SEALED APPLE IPOD TOUCH! ,
8GB MODEL!! This is the latest and greatest from Apple and the 2ND
Generation of this wonderful iPod!

As well, this is eligible for live.com's cashback. You can get this iPod for
about $186!
Please email us if you need assistance on getting the cashback rebate.

Click to go

http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?type=4&campid=5336229480&toolid=10001&customid=&mpre=http%3A%2F%2Felectronics.shop.ebay.com%2Fitems%2FiPod-MP3-Players_%3FBrand%3DApple%252520iPod%26Product%252520Line%3DiPod%252520Touch%26Condition%3DNew%26_dmpt%3DOther_MP3_Players%26_fln%3D1%26_sacat%3D73839%26_ssov%3D1%26_trksid%3Dp3286.c0.m282%26_mPrRngCbx%3D1%26_udlo%3D179.91%26_udhi%3D267.99%26_qi%3DRTM547901

"King John I of AUK" <hones...@centurytel.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:utmdnaRTvpNgr3LU...@centurytel.net...

["The Honest One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:43ae059r16i0ivct1...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 18:03:35 +1000, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> Bob Larter <bobby...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>
> >pandora wrote:
> >> On Sat, 09 May 2009 17:00:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 9 May 2009 14:21:35 -0500, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> got double
secret
> >>> probation for writing:
> >>>
> >>>> Aratzio wrote in news:clhb051d0i1ulq6ph...@4ax.com:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, 9 May 2009 17:00:39 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
> >>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, c...@green.rahul.net (Charlotte L. Blackmer)

got
> >>>>> double secret probation for writing:
> >>>>>

> >>>>>> I have a contrarian opinion on this. It would have been a
brilliant
> >>>>>> move by The Powers That Be under the current circumstances.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you want more of my reasoning, this email address works.
> >>>>> First, there are no powers that be, only ZU'UL. Second, it would
be
> >>>>> obvious.
> >>>>> Third, miggy still froths at the drop of a pronoun.
> >>>> The other side of that is you now have as your FNVW the guy who
> >>>> real-lifed him.
> >>>>
> >>>> I realize that's an inconvenient fact, but it is a fact.
> >>> How about your real lifing activities?
> >>
> >> Only others are wrong, never RHonda.
> >
> >Don't get me started. Some of us are capable of getting along with
> >people, instead of sniping at them.
>
> Cunt.

Ko0k-Fight !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:51bf05d9m432lna1q...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 21:25:25 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>
> >On Sun, 10 May 2009 21:09:15 -0700, Aratzio
<a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 10 May 2009 19:02:42 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for writing:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, 10 May 2009 16:59:35 -0700, Aratzio
<a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:03:11 -0700, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>>miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Sun, 10 May 2009 12:01:17 -0700, Aratzio
<a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Sat, 09 May 2009 20:10:00 -0700, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>>>>miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>On Sat, 09 May 2009 18:44:29 -0700, Aratzio
<a6ah...@sneakemail.com>
> >>>>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 09 May 2009 17:25:49 -0700, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>>>>>>pandora <pan...@peak.org> got double secret probation for
writing:
> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>Her friends are always exempt from any set of rules too.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Now watch what happens when they whine about that statement.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I'm laughing at how stupid you and Pandora are. If you want to
call
> >>>>>>>that whining, be my guest.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>"Yer Stupid, cuz I don't agree"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Try "you are a stupid idiot because you missed the point
completely."
> >>>>
> >>>>Really, you mean the pointing out Rhondumb's hypocrisy in whining
> >>>>about real lifing or that Pandora knew exactly about what I wrote?
> >>
> >>No surprise, no response.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>Since I didn't miss Rhindumb whining for the umpteenth time about
how
> >>>>her poor defenseless miggy was so sorely abused that would be what
is
> >>>>left, miggy.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>HTH stupid idiot.
> >>>>
> >>>>Here is where I provide you the opportunity to demonstrate the
> >>>>validity of your beliefs:
> >>>>
> >>>>(Not that you could)
> >>
> >>No surprise, he didn't
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Quite the debate technique, miggy. Not that you would grasp your
> >>>>>>hilarious hypocrisy coming after your audacious 7th grader
flame.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Froth some more, please.
> >>>>
> >>>>And miggy pulls out the his bestest PeeWee in hopes of deflecting
from
> >>>>his own hilarious hupocrisy.
> >>>>
> >>>More stupid from Aratzio.
> >>
> >>Translation: Can't come up with anything sensible.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>I'm not surprised.
> >>
> >>The ability to understand is what would be required for surprise,
> >>miggy.
> >
> >Only a fool would care about your opinion.
> >
> >HTH, dumbass.
>
> Rhondumb is gonna be pissed at you for caller her a fool.

Why do WE never see you and Whinel Lionel posting at the same
time........only you or Lionel is filling-up AUK with mindless K'rap at
the orders of Peter "Eater" Ross ??

Oh, I get it, you have on Lionel's dirty socks......The Real Lionel is
dead !!

I nominate you for the Fred Hall "son of satan" Award for EVILNESS in
Usenets........

Seconds ??
--
HJ

[Ignis Fatuus]

Seconded

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4a07bff9$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> Aratzio wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:20:25 +1000, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> > Bob Larter <bobby...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for
> > writing:
> >
> >> Aratzio wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 11 May 2009 05:28:48 +1000, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>> Bob Larter <bobby...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for
> >>> writing:
> >>>
> >>>> miguel wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 10 May 2009 17:23:33 +1000, Bob Larter
<bobby...@gmail.com>

> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote:

> >>>>>>> Aratzio wrote in
news:clhb051d0i1ulq6ph...@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 May 2009 17:00:39 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
> >>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, c...@green.rahul.net (Charlotte L. Blackmer)
got
> >>>>>>>> double secret probation for writing:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have a contrarian opinion on this. It would have been a
brilliant
> >>>>>>>>> move by The Powers That Be under the current circumstances.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If you want more of my reasoning, this email address works.
> >>>>>>>> First, there are no powers that be, only ZU'UL.
> >>>>>>>> Second, it would be obvious.
> >>>>>>>> Third, miggy still froths at the drop of a pronoun.
> >>>>>>> The other side of that is you now have as your FNVW the guy
who
> >>>>>>> real-lifed him.

> >>>>>> That data had already been made public in AUK at the time.

> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I realize that's an inconvenient fact, but it is a fact.

> >>>>>> And yet Miggy & I are managing to get along just fine. It
wouldn't do
> >>>>>> any harm for you to learn the same skill.
> >>>>> You might wish to redirect that to Aratzio, although IMO he's so
far
> >>>>> beyond hope that it would most likely be futile.
> >>>> Well, I'll do what I can.
> >>> It is a well known fact I am the most beloved poster in
alt.aratzio.
> >> That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. I expect you're also the
most
> >> prolific poster to that group.
> >
> > Really, we need to be much nicer to the kooks and not tell the truth
> > about them. It is just so rude.
>
> We really need to get in touch with our inner kooks, you
> know the ones that we let slide their tube-steaks up our
> rear-ends!
> --
> Whinel Lionel

That would be a good Summer project for you and Roz Ratzio to work on
together.

Just you two and the boyz !! Lovely......
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

["The Honest One"]

"Ignis Fatuus" <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> wrote in message
news:1gef0591hel6qd0go...@4ax.com...

So mote it be !!
--

[Aratzio]

On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:39:42 +0100, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
Ignis Fatuus <Ig...@fatuusisland.com> got double secret probation for
writing:

I whole heartedly third this fine nomination and I also move that the
FNVW add such to the monthly awards.

Fred deserved as much for his contributions to the debunking of
religious cults and would appreciate his *name* as one of the merit
awards.

[ah]

I secnond this fine coda.

>
> Fred deserved as much for his contributions to the debunking of
> religious cults and would appreciate his *name* as one of the merit
> awards.

Hear. Hear.
--
ah

http://www.gianturl.com?SwcbUqTpYYhY6llZ0K4,4QqY6B4NSqk7VP0d,P4K1V,bW55c2k8,cz8,VJF8s,MYb,Kd0y2n6L,kR1Wr05,,Ryf9Yy,0gwq,Rq8,Y3jP,qC1KS8p9,HV,c,7b7dD2QK,3l,HrWfm4Zn,6v,,mxKH,,,dXzz4S0,jXN5Np2qZMw1my2mjYzvpNhk2s0KN3NMyb2cd5B1,W8YzhgX3BBS,,,r0xD2tqcY7,sqr,p,d,G2T9Br,,M2zq9s2r,5sXWVdv5bV1hrc2wQyPmnk6g,0T7Q0fY1Rn9,nj9t,N,,js2dZFxlxYbyLW,mBn6m4p7SZ,F0M,05jRXcb1TbR7p,mZHn5,,1xKfwK3KN1,5XN,YnQ8c1z,0YMv4zS,xBmr6Byg4zsMtd,C,qLs,fz5L6vyD,2Xv1qLNn2,,0,pHdytQvf0t9FG7FRty5,,4Q3,L7RhyxM6NZSc,,w6s,6bb,N7bgcffxy,LT7L3Xq,,S7,l5w7bd4q,BMww7,,7gvn9hDdBxhh0l,5S1M3yB5,,1,,v3yn,RCtf4zPKlkgG,dJNZmBw7s7l9RHcK7Mw47kGBcl6JkK0tpmZKy9mS7,,cgZ9DV2,9LKPHvT9p6bQ8KMv6,,SlYzz5Tvp8gj,zlBHhp,h,lf3V3xb,,2Gt6tC,s7ns4qp,djt,lz6b4YN6SX,f7yq0L1GX9MtjdP7DX,btS,0xK1s,xQ6cyfyzQwjPxm

[spooge]

Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
news:prah051me8ljpm06a...@4ax.com:

I am compelled to fourth this, and add a hearty 'Hear! Hear!'

> Fred deserved as much for his contributions to the debunking of
> religious cults and would appreciate his *name* as one of the merit
> awards.

Usenet is all the poorer for the lack of Mr. Hall's presence.

--
Let me say
Pepsi Generation
A few lines
Of misinformation
Watch your money
Flow away oh so quick
To kill yourself properly,
Coke is it

["The Honest One"]

"Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:C62F2F97.13540%restavek...@yahoo.com...
>
>
>
> On 5/12/09 1:24 PM, in article
gucb9o$hts$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,
> "Kimberly Barnard" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote:
>
> > In article <C62EBCA6.1328D%restavek...@yahoo.com>,
> > restavek...@yahoo.com says...
> >>
> >> On 5/12/09 5:26 AM, in article 4a0940ab$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob
Larter"
> >> <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Indeed. The thing that really irritates me is her habit of blaming
> >>> people for things done by other people. She seems to think that
AUK has
> >>> some sort of all-powerful Cabal that controls everything that is
posted
> >>> in AUK. Why on earth should Pandora feel obligated to justify /my/
> >>> actions? In the unlikely event that I feel the need to justify
myself,
> >>> it'll be my responsibility, not Pandora's.
> >>
> >> So how DO you justify posting Michael Cranston's name, address,
phone number
> >> and bar number, along with a link to the state bar association
website and a
> >> suggestion that people complain about him to the bar?
> >
> > LMAO
> >
> > How does Mikey justify doing it to other people?
>
> Ah, so it's OK to go "outerfilth" on other people if they've done it
first.
> Like you did to Lynne Lyons.
>
> I note that AUK people never "out" their opponents, except when they
did it
> to Brad Jesness, Lynne Lyons, Michael Wolfe, Ed Wollman, Michael
Cranston
> and a few others. But of course those were just (multiple) exceptions
to
> the rule. You don't take things to real life, unless of course your
targets
> are "kooks," in which case you'll do whatever we like and bully anyone
who
> calls you about it.
>
> > (Rhetorical)
> >
> > Why does this Jeebus forsaken bullshit topic never end?
> >
> > (Not rhetorical) Rhonda keeps on whining and whining about it. For
> > three years. But she's no different than anyone else.
>
> I suppose you'd like it to end. Most sociopaths don't like it when
they get
> called on their behavior and their double standards. Unfortunately,
you're
> not in a position to silence your critics. So you'll have to keep on
> ignoring them or trying to deflect attention from your misdeeds by
calling
> them "whiners" and "kooks."
>
> From your diagnosed disease (Dissociative Identity Disorder), I'm
guessing
> your childhood was something out of a Stephen King novel. Does it
make you
> feel good identifying with the abusers instead of the abused?

Most excellent post !!

<printer sounds>
--
John C.

["The Honest One"]

"Meat Plow" <me...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:2q8kho....@news.alt.net...
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 20:55:41 -0400, "atlas bugged"
> <atlasbug...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote in
message
> >news:2q3bn0....@news.alt.net...
> >> I addressed and referred to Novins by his real name, which he
himself had
> >> used on usenet. Aratzio did the same. In Aratzio's mind, that makes
me a
> >> real-lifing hypocrite, but it's all good for him.
> >
> >You addressed "Novins" by real name and made it clear you wanted to
> >Google-stack thereby. Your goal was to inflict real-life damage to
his
> >business.
>
> God damn you're crazy aren't you...

Awkward sentence structure, Roz....

Everyone reading this knows that you are the crazy one spewing
disinformation at the whim of Peter John Ross !!

Rhonda is merely trying to "tell the truth" to set the record straight
about you, "Haters" !!
--
HJ

p.s. Nice nails, gurl.....where did you get them done ??

[Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries]

"The Honest One" wrote in
news:8oqdnZsiavjyU5TX...@centurytel.net:

Actually, he was talking about Novins, who apparently post-humped my
reply to Aratzio.

In this instance, as much as it pains me, I have to agree with Meat
Plow.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will
scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will
refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something
which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he
will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is
explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell

["The Honest One"]

"Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:C62F55E9.13567%restavek...@yahoo.com...
>
>
>
> On 5/12/09 3:34 PM, in article
guciul$hts$8...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,

> "Kimberly Barnard" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote:
>
> >>> How does Mikey justify doing it to other people?
> >>
> >> Ah, so it's OK to go "outerfilth" on other people if they've done
it first.
> >> Like you did to Lynne Lyons.
> >

> > Nope. It's never ok.
> >
> > What Mikey did was definitely not ok.
> >
> > What Rhonda did was definitely not ok.
> >
> > It's never ok.
> >
> > Which is why all the whining is just rehashed bullshit.
>
> But yet a lot of "kooks" wind up getting their personal information
spewed
> all over the net after they run afoul of AUK... and you're shocked,
shocked,
> SHOCKED to discover this.
>
> > And Lynne? For years she posted with her full name, a link to her
> > web site with her home address and phone number on it, and used her
> > license number in her signature. My ONE TIME posting of her address
> > was a mistake, and I apologized for it and never did it again.
> > That's hardly outer filthing, but I still don't think it should be
> > done.
>
> So you never outerfilth people, except the one time when you did it
and it
> was OK, because the person in question had posted her personal info
before.
> You weren't doing it to harass her or anything like that, mind
you...and
> it's OK because you apologized for it.
>
> > Do note that the offensive, actionable, RL shit she pulled on me and
> > a few other people isn't brought forth as an excuse, unlike the
> > "level the playing field" bullshit offered up ad nauseum by two
> > kooks.
>
> Ah, but you keep forgetting that the "kooks" didn't agree to the rules
your
> little gang of cyberbullies created. You can hardly be surprised that
> people you start taunting decide to get revenge by taking your antics
to
> real life. Well, I guess you can be surprised -- but it's not like
you're
> going to do anything about it. Other than spend thousands of dollars
on
> lawyers, if you're the AUK Defendants, that is.

>
> >> I note that AUK people never "out" their opponents, except when
they did it
> >> to Brad Jesness,
> >

> > That wasn't AUK.
> >
> >> Lynne Lyons,
> >
> > Lynne outed herself on numerous occasions. Also, see above.
> >
> >> Michael Wolfe,
> >
> > That wasn't AUK.
> >
> >> Ed Wollman,
> >
> > All provided by him - no secret.
> >
> >> Michael Cranston
> >
> > Steve Chaney of soc.singles.
> >
> >> and a few others.
> >
> > Really? Name names. Maybe someone will care as much as I have;
> > enough to respond. Maybe not.
>
> ISTR Richard Bullis's personal information getting posted on a few
> occasions. But I suppose that's all right because he was a pedophile.
By
> that standard, I suppose it should be OK to post the information of
people
> who have been convicted of sexual offenses against minors, like, say,
Gary
> Burnore.

>
> >> But of course those were just (multiple) exceptions to
> >> the rule. You don't take things to real life, unless of course your
targets
> >> are "kooks," in which case you'll do whatever we like and bully
anyone who
> >> calls you about it.
> >

> > You are authoritatively ignorant.
>
> Amazing how all these people managed to get their personal info posted
on
> alt.usenet.kooks while the AUK regulars had nothing whatsoever to do
with
> it. I suppose it's just one big coincidence. Either that, or I'm not
the
> one being willfully ignorant here.

>
> >>> (Rhetorical)
> >>>
> >>> Why does this Jeebus forsaken bullshit topic never end?
> >>>
> >>> (Not rhetorical) Rhonda keeps on whining and whining about it. For
> >>> three years. But she's no different than anyone else.
> >>
> >> I suppose you'd like it to end. Most sociopaths don't like it when
they get
> >> called on their behavior and their double standards. Unfortunately,
you're
> >> not in a position to silence your critics. So you'll have to keep
on
> >> ignoring them or trying to deflect attention from your misdeeds by
calling
> >> them "whiners" and "kooks."
> >

> > You're utterly full of shit.
>
> And so, I suppose, is everyone else who has offered a counterexample
to your
> "AUK regulars don't go real-life."

>
> >> From your diagnosed disease (Dissociative Identity Disorder), I'm
guessing
> >> your childhood was something out of a Stephen King novel. Does it
make you
> >> feel good identifying with the abusers instead of the abused?
> >

> > I don't have, and never did have, DID. What other kinds of kook
> > blather do you buy into? Apparently all of it.
> >
> > So in this post you refer to my full name and offer up the bogus
> > diagnosis either as a means to "silence your critic" or because you
> > are no different than the average Google-stacking asshole. Neither
> > is Mikey and neither is Rhonda. Hypocrites, all of you.
>
> Hey, I never bought into your "never take Usenet to real life"
blather. Of
> course, neither did any of the kook-taunters spewing it, except when
it
> served their purposes. I'm all for holding bullies accountable for
their
> behavior by whatever means are required. If someone brings your words
to
> the attention of your boss, your neighbors, your local Child
Protective
> Services, your family, etc. -- well, then, I guess you'd best make
sure
> that your words are something that won't get you into trouble.
>
> > I'm done discussing the topic, frankly. It's gone past the point of
> > ridiculous.
>
> Don't let the doorknob hit you on the ass on your way out. And do say
hello
> to the former FNVW: perhaps if you feel generous you can even donate a
few
> dollars toward his legal bills *snicker*
>
> I love the smell of spanked sociopath in the morning. It's the smell
of
> victory.

Another Great Post !!

["The Honest One"]

"Bob Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:gucr6n$pmc$3...@tor.eternal-september.org...

> Kali wrote:
> >
> > I'm done discussing the topic, frankly. It's gone past the point of
> > ridiculous.
>

> Looks like somebody got spanked !!
> --
> Lionel

No shit !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Russell Tavek" <restavek...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:C62F99AE.13594%restavek...@yahoo.com...
>
>
>
> On 5/12/09 6:52 PM, in article 2q9kll....@news.alt.net, "Rhonda
Lea
> Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
> > What Kali did was definitely not okay...
> >
> >> It's never ok.
> >
> > ...except in her own mind when she does it or Lionel does it or any
one
> >
> > of a number of others does it.
>
> Kim(*) has a lot vested in the idea that "kook taunting" is just
harmless
> fun and games and none of the kook taunters would ever actually go
"real
> life" on anyone. And any time you present one of the numerous examples
of
> "kookologists" taking it to RL, she has a quick and convenient excuse.
I
> suppose she's decided identifying with the abusers is less painful
than
> identifying with the abused, which is sad but not all that surprising.
>
> Of course, the point isn't to convince Kim that her friends are a
bunch of
> sociopaths and cyberbullies. The point is to show her logical
contortions
> and inconsistencies. So far that's working remarkably well.
>
> (*) Since Kim's personal information has been posted to Usenet on
numerous
> occasions, I presume it's all right to repost it here and elsewhere.
After
> all, Lionel was just reposting something Steve Chaney had posted
earlier,
> and so that made it all right.

>
> >> That's hardly outer filthing, but I still don't think it should be
> >> done.
> >

> > Of course not. If you do it, it can't be outerfilthing.

> >
> >> Do note that the offensive, actionable, RL shit she pulled on me
and
> >> a few other people isn't brought forth as an excuse,
> >

> > Of course not, although it was the excuse for the FAQ, right?

> >
> >> unlike the
> >> "level the playing field" bullshit offered up ad nauseum by two
> >> kooks.
> >

> > Then why a FAQ?
> >
> > What is that if not revenge?
>
> The point that Kim and her fellow "kookologists" seem to miss
repeatedly is
> this: even if they were honoring their "no going r/l" rule (which they
> aren't, and haven't been for some time), they have no reason to expect
their
> targets to do the same. If you decide you're going to pull someone
into a
> nonconsensual BDSM scene, you can't get offended when they don't honor
your
> boundaries or your safeword.

>
> >>> I note that AUK people never "out" their opponents, except when
they
> >>> did it to Brad Jesness,
> >>
> >> That wasn't AUK.
> >>
> >>> Lynne Lyons,
> >>
> >> Lynne outed herself on numerous occasions. Also, see above.
> >

> > Well, so did Novins.
>
> Kim's Facebook page lists her employer and has a link to her daughter.
By
> her own logic, it would be perfectly all right to repost that info far
and
> wide where all her fans could find it. Hey, she posted it voluntarily,
> right: therefore, she can't complain when it's used to harass her.

>
> >>> Michael Wolfe,
> >>
> >> That wasn't AUK.
> >

> > Who is Michael Wolfe?
>
> I meant "Robert Wolfe," who posted proof of AUK regulars contacting
his
> employer. But of course Kim can't admit that her beloved kookologists
would
> ever do such a thing, so she's going to pretend that it didn't happen
and
> that anyone who points it out must be a kook and a whiner whose
opinion
> doesn't matter.

>
> >>> Ed Wollman,
> >>
> >> All provided by him - no secret.
> >

> > Same as Novins and Lynnn, then?

> >
> >>> Michael Cranston
> >>
> >> Steve Chaney of soc.singles.
> >

> > Lionel, the FNVW.
> >
> > Now you're trying to make the argument that if it's been outed
before,
> > it's okay to out it again.
> >
> > I guess Mike's off the hook now too.
>
> Honest John posted info on Kim's family. Therefore, it's perfectly
all
> right to repost it by Kim's standards. Assuming, of course, that Kim's
> standards weren't "do as I say, not as my friends and I do."

>
> >>> I suppose you'd like it to end. Most sociopaths don't like it when
> >>> they get called on their behavior and their double standards.
> >>> Unfortunately, you're not in a position to silence your critics.
So
> >>> you'll have to keep on ignoring them or trying to deflect
attention
> >>> from your misdeeds by calling them "whiners" and "kooks."
> >>
> >> You're utterly full of shit.
> >

> > He's absolutely spot-on.

> >
> >>> From your diagnosed disease (Dissociative Identity Disorder), I'm
> >>> guessing your childhood was something out of a Stephen King novel.
> >>> Does it make you feel good identifying with the abusers instead of
> >>> the abused?
> >>
> >> I don't have, and never did have, DID. What other kinds of kook
> >> blather do you buy into? Apparently all of it.
> >>
> >> So in this post you refer to my full name and offer up the bogus
> >> diagnosis either as a means to "silence your critic" or because you
> >> are no different than the average Google-stacking asshole. Neither
> >> is Mikey and neither is Rhonda. Hypocrites, all of you.
> >>

> >> I'm done discussing the topic, frankly. It's gone past the point of
> >> ridiculous.
> >

> > So how's the momma's boy doin', anyway, now that he's out of a job
as
> > head bully?
> >
> > (Now that you're back and seemingly full of piss and vinegar, I'll
be
> > sure to dig out that last reply I never posted. You'll like it.)
>
> She'll certainly have some reason to avoid addressing the real issues.
> Which is fine: the more she
>
> BTW, I was amused to see Lionel's recent efforts to obfuscate Robert
"Henri"
> Clark's real identity, even though Robert has admitted to it numerous
times.
> I'm sure Mr. Novins will be happy to see it as well. After all, he's
> claiming that the AUKtards regularly engage in behavior designed to
protect
> their fellow trolls and sociopaths...and take their organized libel
machine
> offshore when they're hit with cease and desist letters from American
> lawyers. Lionel is certainly doing his best to prove Novins right: one
might
> think he was on Ol' Charlie's payroll.

This post is the Greatest single post in AUK history !!

I am speechless !!

<more printer sounds>

["The Honest One"]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:2q9kll....@news.alt.net...
> Kali wrote in news:guciul$hts$8...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
> > In article <C62F2F97.13540%restavek...@yahoo.com>,

> > restavek...@yahoo.com says...
> >>
> >> On 5/12/09 1:24 PM, in article
> >> gucb9o$hts$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com, "Kimberly Barnard"
> >> <ka...@happy.joy> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <C62EBCA6.1328D%restavek...@yahoo.com>,
> >>> restavek...@yahoo.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/12/09 5:26 AM, in article 4a0940ab$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob
> >>>> Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Indeed. The thing that really irritates me is her habit of
blaming
> >>>>> people for things done by other people. She seems to think that
> >>>>> AUK has some sort of all-powerful Cabal that controls everything
> >>>>> that is posted in AUK. Why on earth should Pandora feel
obligated
> >>>>> to justify /my/ actions? In the unlikely event that I feel the
> >>>>> need to justify myself, it'll be my responsibility, not
Pandora's.
> >>>>
> >>>> So how DO you justify posting Michael Cranston's name, address,
> >>>> phone number and bar number, along with a link to the state bar
> >>>> association website and a suggestion that people complain about
> >>>> him to the bar?
> >>>
> >>> LMAO
> >>>

> >>> How does Mikey justify doing it to other people?
> >>
> >> Ah, so it's OK to go "outerfilth" on other people if they've done
it
> >> first. Like you did to Lynne Lyons.
> >
> > Nope. It's never ok.
> >
> > What Mikey did was definitely not ok.
> >
> > What Rhonda did was definitely not ok.
>

> What Kali did was definitely not okay...
>
> > It's never ok.
>
> ...except in her own mind when she does it or Lionel does it or any
one
> of a number of others does it.
>

> > Which is why all the whining is just rehashed bullshit.
> >

> > And Lynne? For years she posted with her full name, a link to her
> > web site with her home address and phone number on it, and used her
> > license number in her signature. My ONE TIME posting of her address
> > was a mistake, and I apologized for it and never did it again.
>

> You said "oops," and you made no effort to have it removed from
Google.

>
> > That's hardly outer filthing, but I still don't think it should be
> > done.
>
> Of course not. If you do it, it can't be outerfilthing.
>
> > Do note that the offensive, actionable, RL shit she pulled on me and
> > a few other people isn't brought forth as an excuse,
>
> Of course not, although it was the excuse for the FAQ, right?
>
> > unlike the
> > "level the playing field" bullshit offered up ad nauseum by two
> > kooks.
>
> Then why a FAQ?
>
> What is that if not revenge?
>

> >> I note that AUK people never "out" their opponents, except when
they
> >> did it to Brad Jesness,
> >
> > That wasn't AUK.
> >
> >> Lynne Lyons,
> >
> > Lynne outed herself on numerous occasions. Also, see above.
>
> Well, so did Novins.
>

> >> Michael Wolfe,
> >
> > That wasn't AUK.
>
> Who is Michael Wolfe?
>

> >> Ed Wollman,
> >
> > All provided by him - no secret.
>
> Same as Novins and Lynnn, then?
>
> >> Michael Cranston
> >
> > Steve Chaney of soc.singles.
>
> Lionel, the FNVW.
>
> Now you're trying to make the argument that if it's been outed before,
> it's okay to out it again.
>
> I guess Mike's off the hook now too.
>

> >> and a few others.
> >
> > Really? Name names. Maybe someone will care as much as I have;
> > enough to respond. Maybe not.
>

> Names have been named. You have an excuse for all of them.
>
> <snicker>

>
> >> But of course those were just (multiple) exceptions to
> >> the rule. You don't take things to real life, unless of course your
> >> targets are "kooks," in which case you'll do whatever we like and
> >> bully anyone who calls you about it.
> >
> > You are authoritatively ignorant.
>

> lol
>
> He hit the nail on the head.

>
> >>> (Rhetorical)
> >>>
> >>> Why does this Jeebus forsaken bullshit topic never end?
> >>>
> >>> (Not rhetorical) Rhonda keeps on whining and whining about it. For
> >>> three years. But she's no different than anyone else.
> >>

> >> I suppose you'd like it to end. Most sociopaths don't like it when
> >> they get called on their behavior and their double standards.
> >> Unfortunately, you're not in a position to silence your critics. So
> >> you'll have to keep on ignoring them or trying to deflect attention
> >> from your misdeeds by calling them "whiners" and "kooks."
> >
> > You're utterly full of shit.
>
> He's absolutely spot-on.
>
> >> From your diagnosed disease (Dissociative Identity Disorder), I'm
> >> guessing your childhood was something out of a Stephen King novel.
> >> Does it make you feel good identifying with the abusers instead of
> >> the abused?
> >
> > I don't have, and never did have, DID. What other kinds of kook
> > blather do you buy into? Apparently all of it.
> >
> > So in this post you refer to my full name and offer up the bogus
> > diagnosis either as a means to "silence your critic" or because you
> > are no different than the average Google-stacking asshole. Neither
> > is Mikey and neither is Rhonda. Hypocrites, all of you.
> >
> > I'm done discussing the topic, frankly. It's gone past the point of
> > ridiculous.
>
> So how's the momma's boy doin', anyway, now that he's out of a job as
> head bully?
>
> (Now that you're back and seemingly full of piss and vinegar, I'll be
> sure to dig out that last reply I never posted. You'll like it.)

> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

IAWTP !!
--
John C.

p.s. Hi "pookie"...

["The Honest One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

> On Tue, 12 May 2009 08:42:19 -0700, in the land of alt.aratzio, miguel

> <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>

> >He's a wanker.
>
> WOOT, miggy rejoinds with a devastating follow-up. Will our Gay hero
> be able to recover from the giant smackdowns applied by the hypocrisy
> corps. Will there be usenet after such a well place blow.
>
> <fade to black>
>
> <insert pecker into PJR all summer>

Good move, Roz !!
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

> On Mon, 11 May 2009 17:45:24 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,

> miguel <mun...@mungge.com> got double secret probation for writing:
>

> >It's my fault you're frothing. You can't help yourself. But I can't
be
> >blamed for your mediocrity.
>
> I resemble that remark!

We know Roz...
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message

news:2q9q79....@news.alt.net...
> Kali wrote in news:gucb9o$hts$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

>
> > In article <C62EBCA6.1328D%restavek...@yahoo.com>,
> > restavek...@yahoo.com says...
> >>
> >> On 5/12/09 5:26 AM, in article 4a0940ab$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au, "Bob
> >> Larter" <bobby...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Indeed. The thing that really irritates me is her habit of blaming
> >>> people for things done by other people. She seems to think that
AUK
> >>> has some sort of all-powerful Cabal that controls everything that
> >>> is posted in AUK. Why on earth should Pandora feel obligated to
> >>> justify /my/ actions? In the unlikely event that I feel the need
to
> >>> justify myself, it'll be my responsibility, not Pandora's.
> >>
> >> So how DO you justify posting Michael Cranston's name, address,
> >> phone number and bar number, along with a link to the state bar
> >> association website and a suggestion that people complain about him
> >> to the bar?
> >
> > LMAO
> >
> > How does Mikey justify doing it to other people?
>

> Let's get something straight: he apologized to Tammy Chaney, publicly
> and privately. She accepted his apology and he did everything he could
> to mitigate the damage. And no, I don't know this because *he* told me
> so.
>
> As for you, you wanted to call him a dogfucker, so your previously
> posted information (which, according to you, apparently gets an
> exemption from the "no real-lifing" rule) got a little exercise for a
> few posts. I never saw you apologize to him, apparently because you
were
> the only person wronged in that exchange. Well, in your head, anyway.
>
> And all because you couldn't handle the question: why isn't it
> netcopping when you do it, Kym?

>
> > (Rhetorical)
> >
> > Why does this Jeebus forsaken bullshit topic never end?
> >
> > (Not rhetorical) Rhonda keeps on whining and whining about it.
>

> Yes, of course, I'm whining. It's always whining when it's someone you
> don't like doing it.

>
> > For
> > three years. But she's no different than anyone else.
>

> <shakes head> God, you're dumb.

>
> --
> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

You GO girl and stand-up for TRVTH, JVSTICE, & THE AMERICAN WAY !!
--
John C.

["The Honest One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:9n0k05htskq1b4q1s...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 01:00:56 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> got double secret
> probation for writing:
>
> >Aratzio wrote in news:2l9h05d2v8jq89vem...@4ax.com:
> >
> >> On Mon, 11 May 2009 00:16:42 -0500, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> got double secret
> >> probation for writing:
> >>
> >>> Aratzio wrote in news:h18f05t7b2jmbujcg...@4ax.com:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sun, 10 May 2009 21:01:52 -0500, in the land of
alt.usenet.kooks,
> >>>> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> got double secret
> >>>> probation for writing:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Aratzio wrote in
news:ko9e05hsm1dl0eosg...@4ax.com:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, 10 May 2009 00:31:26 -0500, in the land of
> >>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> >>>>>> <rhonda...@earthling.net> got double secret probation for
> >>>>>> writing:

> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> pandora wrote in news:pan.2009.05.10....@peak.org:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 09 May 2009 17:00:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 May 2009 14:21:35 -0500, in the land of
> >>>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries"
> >>>>>>>>> <rhonda...@earthling.net> got double secret probation
for
> >>>>>>>>> writing:
> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>> Aratzio wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>> news:clhb051d0i1ulq6ph...@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 May 2009 17:00:39 +0000 (UTC), in the land of
> >>>>>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks, c...@green.rahul.net (Charlotte L.
Blackmer)

> >>>>>>>>>>> got double secret probation for writing:
> >>>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a contrarian opinion on this. It would have been
a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> brilliant move by The Powers That Be under the current
> >>>>>>>>>>>> circumstances.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you want more of my reasoning, this email address
works.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> First, there are no powers that be, only ZU'UL. Second, it
> >>>>>>>>>>> would be obvious.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Third, miggy still froths at the drop of a pronoun.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The other side of that is you now have as your FNVW the guy
> >>>>>>>>>> who real-lifed him.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I realize that's an inconvenient fact, but it is a fact.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How about your real lifing activities?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Only others are wrong, never RHonda.
> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>> Here's a clue for you, Marg.

> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I addressed and referred to Novins by his real name, which he
> >>>>>>> himself had used on usenet. Aratzio did the same. In Aratzio's
> >>>>>>> mind, that makes me a real-lifing hypocrite, but it's all good
> >>>>>>> for him.
> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> You are still lying Rhonda.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Not at all. I didn't realize that these little nuances are so
> >>>>> important in determining the filthiness of the outer-filthing,
or I
> >>>>> would've been happy to throw them in. The posts don't lie,
Aratzio,
> >>>>> and unlike you, I'm not a scared little bunny who xnas my posts.
> >>>>
> >>>> Who do you imagine xnas posts and why I would care? You called
him
> >>>> out by name, location and his occupation. That "nuance" as you
try
> >>>> to minimize your own actions is outer filthing and no matter how
> >>>> you try to lie.
> >>
> >> Hrmm? Avoiding the main point, what a surprise.
> >
> >No, Mr. Argument-By-Misdirection, the main point is that your FNVW
> >outerfilthed Miguel.
>
> And you are a whining hypocrite who does the same thing and then tries
> to lie about your own actions.
>
> >
> >I'm a kook, remember? That means you should expect me to do kooky
> >things. Your FNVW on the other hand, is held to a higher standard.
>
> So, RHonDumb, what would you like the denizens of AUK to do about it?
> What would be your best possible scenario? You never know, someone
> might actually take the word of a lying hypocrite at face value and
> care what you are whining about.
>
> Then again, there is the ever so slight possibility that nothing will
> happen and you will whine endlessly about the evil denizens and how
> they just don't care what you whine about. Well, other than to pull
> your little chatty cathy cord and have you mouth breathe the wexact
> same whines about the exact same people with the exact same result.
>
> You must be so proud of your complete impotence.
>
>
> >
> >>>>>> Remember you used his location and his
> >>>>>> occupation. There is only one reason for posting that
information.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are you aware there's an attorney in the state of Washington who
is
> >>>>> also named "Charles Novins"?
> >>>>
> >>>> Which is why you made sure to refer to his location and
occupation,
> >>>> correct? The only people I remember doing that are you, Wills and
> >>>> Roger.
> >>>>
> >>>> There may have been others but you three are the only ones I saw
or
> >>>> read.
> >>>
> >>> There were others, whether you saw them or not.
> >>>
> >>>>> Didn't think so.
> >>>>
> >>>> The little voices clained it was so! Really, they are always
right
> >>>> and Rhondumb swears by their mind reading ability.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Further, the guy in Toms River has "outed" his profession and
> >>>>> location many times, so your self-exception fails again.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, he did not.
> >>>
> >>> Oh, he most certainly did. I have those posts too.
> >>>
> >>>> That was Wills, Roger and then you. Keep spinning
> >>>> those lies, I am sure miggy will be along shortly to assure you
that
> >>>> all is well.
> >>>
> >>> Fact is not spin, and you're doing a bad job of obfuscating fact.
> >>
> >> So why did you need to reference there is another lawyer by the
same
> >> name?
> >>
> >> Your spin is "I addressed and referred to Novins by his real name,

> >> which he himself had used on usenet."
> >>

> >> You ALWAYS leave out that you were also calling out his location
and
> >> his occupation. There is only one reason to do that.
> >
> >According to you.
>
> :I think some effort must be made to avoid muddying the waters,
however.
> :He is not the only Charles Novins who practices law in the United
> :States, so in fairness to the other one, he needs to be distinguished
by
> :locale, i.e., Toms River, New Jersey.
>
> Since that is just one of the times, let us be clear hear, you wanted
> to insure that only one of the novins business' was targeted?
>
> >
> >> Damaging someone's business when they have employees is taking your
> >> petty grievances out on the employees too.
> >
> >If his business was damaged because of his very own words, then he
has
> >the obligation to moderate his very own words.
>
> Regardless of the resultant damage to the employees that your actions
> have. People who have nothing to do with your attempts to extract
> revenge from novins.
>
> It is their fault for working for a dick, right. You would be doing
> them a favor by making them find new jobs in this economy, well, as
> long as you get that petty revenge.
>
>
> >
> >> But that did not matter to you, you needed your pound of flaesh and
> >> you found every rationalization to do such.
> >
> ><shakes head>
>
> It won't clear any of that fog you have, ot is permanent.
>
> >
> >> Principals are not hobbies. You whine constantly about what
happened
> >> to your poor defenseless miggy and how abhorent that was, yet you
turn
> >> around and use the same tactics you supposedly find so abhorrent
and
> >> use them on someone else.
> >
> >I didn't call Novins a dogfucker and put up a webpage in his honor.
>
> "I wasn't as bad as they were, so what I did was okay"
>
> Any old rationalization for RhonDumb. As long as she can come up with
> even one thing that she feels is worse than what she did, then what
> she did is fully justifiable.
>
> Except for the full on hypocrisy of her actions.
>
> >
> >I pointed out his very own words and actions. Period.
>
> Liar, his job and his location.
> >
> >If you can't see the difference, it's not my problem.
>
> :I think some effort must be made to avoid muddying the waters,
however.
> :He is not the only Charles Novins who practices law in the United
> :States, so in fairness to the other one, he needs to be distinguished
by
> :locale, i.e., Toms River, New Jersey.
>
> >
> >> That is hypocrisy and you are a liar if you say you didn't do it to
> >> damage his business.
> >
> >So why did you use his real name, Aratzio?
>
> He challenged me to use it. We've been though this several times and
> the answer does not change. Unlike you I have no need to lie about my
> actions or motivations.
>
> >
> >Was it your intent to damage his business?
>
> No and that is quite obvious. However you will continue to lie and
> minimize your own actions in hopes of equating two very dissimilar
> actions as your excuse for your hypocrisy.
>
>
> >
> >>>>>> You keep lying about your actions, I will keep telling the
truth,
> >>>>>> hypocrite.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As I said, all my posts still exist, so there's no motivation
for
> >>>>> me to lie.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, they do and that is why I know you lied. You posted his
> >>>> residency and his occupation simply to get back at him for
posting
> >>>> incorrect info for Cujo.
> >>>
> >>> That's false.
> >>>
> >>> He did two things. Posting addresses was one,
> >>
> >> A bad one at that, contrary to your hysteria at the time.
> >
> >That wasn't the point.
>
> You were so proud when you thought I didn't know that fact. Your
> feigned outrage and hysteria were quite childish. However your
> subsequent actions were even more childish.
>
> >
> >>> calling Gary a pedophile
> >>> and posting all those links repeatedly was another.
> >>
> >> Gary is a big boy and has shown repeatedly he is more than capable
of
> >> defending himself. Claiming cover there is a rationalization to
defend
> >> your hypocrisy.
> >
> >My motivations and reasons are what you say they are. Got it.
>
> No, you claim the cover of his defamation of Gary. WHat does that have
> to do with your actions with respect to posting his business
> information? You are claiming his actions with respect to Gary are
> your justification. I call that rationalizing your actions with utter
> bullshit.
>
> Did you think Gary was like miggy and unable to take care of himself?
>
>
> >
> >>> And then I found the post he made about his staff, which gave lie
to
> >>> every representation he ever made to me about himself.
> >>
> >> That has fuck all to do with you and is just another
rationalization
> >> to defend your hypocrisy.
> >
> >So why did you use his real name?
>
> Same answer as every other time. Still does not excuse why you tried
> to damage his business.
>
> >
> >>> And there's more, but the "more" is something I won't discuss
here.
> >>
> >> That still leaves your need for revenge and how your claims of
being
> >> so upset by what Lionel did to miggy were just situational ethics
of
> >> the most pathetic kind.
> >
> >I dealt with this above, Ratz.
>
> You are still a lying hypocrite, no matter how many times you try to
> hide behind the actions of others.
>
>
> >
> >>>> Just "leveliing the playing field" and in the process
> >>>> showing just what a hypocrite you are. All that moral posing you
did
> >>>> and yet at the first opportunity you sacrificed it all just to
"get
> >>>> even".
> >>>
> >>> This does not change the fact that you were also identifying him
by
> >>> name, which is what he objected to.
> >>
> >> Nice attempt to make it "You are just as bad as me" when you know
for
> >> a fact his name was never the issue.
> >
> >It certainly was.
>
> So, you are calling miggy a liar? It was never his name. If you had
> damaged his business and someone has lost their job, other than
> novins, would your need for revenge be satisfied?
>
> >
> >He objected to it most strenuously.
>
> Then he should not challenge people to use the name. One or the other
> not both.
>
> >
> >> It is your actions with respect
> >> to the business and your complete lack of concern for the employees
of
> >> the business, hypocrite.
> >
> >What employees would those be? The ones he libeled? I think not. So
who?
>
> Yep, there it is again, complete lack of concern for people she does
> not know, has no idea as to their social or financial situations and
> is willing to sacrifice them for her petty revenge.
>
> Novins made a post about them that you did not like and therefore
> whatever you do is therefore justified.
>
> Quite the concern for those employees that you have just demonstrated.
>
> If you had cared even a little for them you would not have gone after
> his business, hypocrite
>
> >
> >>>>> You, on the other hand, lie like a cheap ho.
> >>>>
> >>>> I do so enjoy when you start projecting, it is always so
incredibly
> >>>> obvious when someone hits too close to home with you.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here, I'll give you an opportunity to show where I lied, just
post
> >>>> the mid and your evidence to support your claim:
> >>>
> >>> What particular mids would you like? Be specific.
> >>
> >> Funny how you claim to have all those achives right at your
fingertips
> >> and when asked for one mid, you run.
> >
> >Certainly, you've been lying in this thread. And you do the same in
> >other threads--twist and turn reality on its side to get where you
want
> >to be.
>
> And yet you cannot point to one lie that is supported by anything
> other than your delusions.
>
> Not much of a surprise.
>
> >
> >Nonetheless, your FNVW is outerfilth. That was where this started.
It's
> >not about me. It's about your FNVW being outfilth.
>
> And you are a hypocrite outerfilth.
>
> See how that works, Rhondumb? You outerfilth and you don't get to
> whine and complain about anyone else that might have done anything
> even similar.
>
> Now, whine "You used his name<STOMP>!"
>
> >
> >>>>>>> The FNVW, on the other hand, posted Mike's name, address,
phone
> >>>>>>> number, and bar number, along with a link to the state bar
> >>>>>>> association website and suggested that complaints should be
made
> >>>>>>> about him to the bar.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Reconcile all that, why don't you.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, that is all Pandora's fault and her responsibility to
defend.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Y'know, if she doesn't want to be involved, she doesn't have to
> >>>>> involve herself.
> >>>>
> >>>> You should learn that no one really gives a shit about your
> >>>> obsession with lionel. Most people didn't read that tedious
blather
> >>>> when it happened and yet you can barely make it a week without
> >>>> whining about it and blaming everyone that was not involved for
the
> >>>> actions of others.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Christ, I would hate to live inside your head. What a mess you
are.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, that whole facing reality would truly suck for you.
> >>>
> >>> If you represent reality, all of us may as well head over to
> >>> alt.suicide.holiday.
> >>
> >> And RhonDumb closes with her ad hominem.
> >>
> >> So do explain how your actions differed from what you whine Lionel
did
> >> to miggy.
> >
> >It doesn't matter, Ratz. I'm not the FNVW.
>
> But you are the Chief Hypocrite.

Roz, that was the best Ko0kDance this year by a Ko0k !!

Congratulations go to Roz Ratzio (Gay caballer) and cry-baby !!
--
King John I of AUK (Writing-up Special Citation for Roz)

["The Honest One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

> On Tue, 12 May 2009 01:01:48 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,

> "Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> got double secret
> probation for writing:
>

> >Well, my opinion matters not to you, so why don't you explain the
same,
> >and then I'll plagarize your rationale.
>
> You know, there is a reason I call you RhonDumb.
> --
> Roz Ratzio

You know, there is a reason I call you Roz.
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:l94k05djk2u4mdges...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:23:54 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> "Clave" <ClaviusNo...@cablespeed.com> got double secret
> probation for writing:
>
> >"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message
> >news:2q7q0k....@news.alt.net...
> >
> ><...>
> >
> >> What a bunch of shitheels you lot are.
> >
> >Yet you keep coming back.
> >
> >Jim
>
> But she doesn't care about our opinions, really, I read it on usenet.

Roz, you are the devil and totally EVIL, really, I read it on Usenet.
--
HJ

["The Honest One"]

"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <ni...@databasix.com> wrote in message

news:2q9t8b....@news.alt.net...
> Aratzio wrote in news:hi4k05l49jcuji8u5...@4ax.com:
>
> > therefore what are people
> > going to do about you being FNVW.
>
> Well, I do recall that spooge said that Lionel isn't a kookologist or
> something akin to that.
>
> I have message IDs for that. Would you like to see them?

It really doesn't matter as the Ko0k you refer to as Lionel is Peter J.
Ross' hand-picked stooge and is OK because the "Big Daddy" of the Gay
caballers declares it to be OK, and you have no say being deemed a Ko0k
for just trying to defend yourself from a creep that molested you in an
elevator in a Dallas Hotel.
--
John C.

["The Honest One"]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message

news:hs4k05p4970vr57vf...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 09:53:25 -0400, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> Meat Plow <me...@petitmorte.net> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>

> >On Sun, 10 May 2009 20:55:41 -0400, "atlas bugged"
> ><atlasbug...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >>"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote in
message
> >>news:2q3bn0....@news.alt.net...

> >>> I addressed and referred to Novins by his real name, which he
himself had
> >>> used on usenet. Aratzio did the same. In Aratzio's mind, that
makes me a
> >>> real-lifing hypocrite, but it's all good for him.
> >>

> >>You addressed "Novins" by real name and made it clear you wanted to
> >>Google-stack thereby. Your goal was to inflict real-life damage to
his
> >>business.
> >
> >God damn you're crazy aren't you...
>

> Just to make sure, which one?

AUK's dumb....and dumber !!
[Roz] [Twinkie-Boi]

Hee....Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
--
HJ

[Bob Larter]

Probably because we're in time-zones that're something like 12 hours
apart. ;^)

>....only you or Lionel is filling-up AUK with mindless K'rap at
>> the orders of Peter "Eater" Ross ??
>>
>> Oh, I get it, you have on Lionel's dirty socks......The Real Lionel is
>> dead !!
>>
>> I nominate you for the Fred Hall "son of satan" Award for EVILNESS in
>> Usenets........
>>
>> Seconds ??
>
> Seconded

Rejected.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------