Google 網路論壇不再支援新的 Usenet 貼文或訂閱項目,但過往內容仍可供查看。

Creating Retro-charter for regional newsgroup?

瀏覽次數:3 次
跳到第一則未讀訊息

cru3l_3...@salmahayeksknockers.edu

未讀,
2003年1月17日 凌晨3:51:442003/1/17
收件者:
A regional newsgroup is charterless, causing much debate over what is, and
what is not allowed, particularly in regards to selling.

Is it possible to retroactively create a charter for the newsgroup? What is
the process for doing this?

I've checked google, and google groups, but the references to
retro-chartering are few and far between.

--
............................................................................

"Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate -
healthy, virile hate - for what the German personifies and for what
persists in the German."
- Nobel Peace Prize recipient Elie Wiesel
............................................................................
http://www.memeticcandiru.com dan...@swan.com

Don Aitken

未讀,
2003年1月17日 下午5:00:222003/1/17
收件者:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:51:44 GMT,
cru3l_3...@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:

>A regional newsgroup is charterless, causing much debate over what is, and
>what is not allowed, particularly in regards to selling.
>
>Is it possible to retroactively create a charter for the newsgroup? What is
>the process for doing this?
>
>I've checked google, and google groups, but the references to
>retro-chartering are few and far between.

It depends on the hierarchy. It is allowed in some hierarchies (uk.*,
for instance). However, an attempt to adopt a charter which would stop
any significant number of the actual users of the group doing what
they are currently doing would be pretty unpopular anywhere - too much
like censorship. A charter adopted in those circumstances should stick
with formalising current practice. If there is no agreement as to what
that is, you're screwed, basically. As a rule of thumb, if there is an
active debate as to whether something is allowed (as opposed to just a
couple of bozos disagreeing with everybody else), and nobody can find
an applicable rule that says it *isn't* allowed, then it's allowed.
One possible exception - if the posts complained of are marginal to
the topic of the group, and there is another group in the *same*
hierarchy where they would be undoubtedly on-topic, most people would
say that they should move.

--
Don Aitken

0 則新訊息