Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

Abusive binary posts.

2 views
Skip to first unread message

ISP_Ratings

unread,
Jan 7, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/7/98
to

Ricardo G. <ric...@primus.paranoia.com> wrote...
:
:Dave Ratcliffe <da...@frackit.com> wrote:
:
::|:>There was no problem until you guys started sending forged cancels for
::|:>on-topic posts. Don't you have anything better to do with your time
::|:>then disrupt newsgroups?
::|: Actually, there was no problem until people started crossposting
::|: inappropriately.
::|
::|I'm not really talking about crossposts. I'm also not talking about
::|inappropriately posted porn binaries or advertisements. I'm talking
::|about on-topic binaries posts, such as pictures or sound clips posted
::|in a fan group.
:
::I'm sorry.... when did alt.binaries.fan.* start up?
:
:It didn't need to. Many of the fan groups naturally evolved to include
:some acceptible number of on-topic binaries posts.
:
::| Let's say these are relevant to the topic of the
::|newsgroup and on-topic.
:
::Let say they're not on-topic in non-binary hierarchy discussion groups. Oh.
::Wait. That's already the case.
:
:"Binary" is not a topic.

Well Dave is not very bright.

:A fan group might contain both messages about a popular individual and
:pictures, sound clips, or videos of that person. As long as posts are
:on topic they are acceptable.

That's the problem--some (cabal in general) need things to be
very tightly compartmentalized in order to understand things.
You can't mix things like this because it will confuse their
sense of order.

::| Since the readers enjoy these binaries, why is
::|a rogue net-cop like Dick Depew disrupting newsgroups with his
::|crusade of purity?

He gets confused and angry because the group is no
longer s simple place for him.


::He's not. He's cleaning space eating binaries out of non-binary
::hierarchies so that news admins who wish to can avoid carrying
::the binary hierarchies and the overhead that goes with it.
:
:He can do that on his own system. We don't need his forged cancels
:and censorship littering other systems and causing a cascade of
:problems where they are unwanted.

Look at what they did with TIAC!!!

:Dick Depew has not announced his pseudo-site and therefore is
:considered to be a rogue canceler.

Anyone who forges anothers email address to cancel their
post is a rogue canceler with the ethics foundation of
a snail.

Steve
news.admin.censorship

:
:-Ric G.
:Official FAQ Maintainer - news.admin hierarchy
:"Of all the sins with which a man defiles himself in this world, this is the
:sin with which he is most defiled." - M Shabbat 2:6
:

0 new messages